reasoning: The paragraph is principally about oversight of cybersecurity risk, led by the Board of Directors, with supporting reference to the Risk Committee's role in evaluating cyber risk and incident materiality. The named Risk Committee makes this disclosure firm-specific.


content_category: Board Governance

category_confidence: medium

specificity_confidence: medium

reasoning: The paragraph is primarily framed as the company's cybersecurity governance structure, led by the Board's oversight responsibilities and delegated committee monitoring, even though it also includes management and team details. It contains multiple firm-specific, externally checkable facts, including the named CISO and specific years describing that executive's experience.

provider: openai

stage: benchmark


content_category: Risk Management Process

category_confidence: high

specificity_confidence: high

reasoning: The paragraph primarily describes the company’s internal cybersecurity assessment and improvement processes, including external audits, testing, and adjustment of controls, so it fits Risk Management Process. It is Firm-Specific because it goes beyond merely naming a framework and states that the company received ISO/IEC 27001:2013 certification.


reasoning: The paragraph is most centrally about oversight, with the audit committee and board described as overseeing cybersecurity risk, receiving reports, and handling escalation protocols. Although it also includes substantial management-role detail, the dominant framing is governance by the audit committee and board.


content_category: Incident Disclosure

reasoning: This paragraph centers on a real cybersecurity incident, describing unauthorized activity on IT systems, the resulting operational disruptions, and current operational status. Although it also includes materiality and financial impact language, the paragraph still describes what happened and the effects of the incident, making Incident Disclosure the best fit.


reasoning: The paragraph is primarily about how the company's cybersecurity program is managed and implemented, including monitoring, vulnerability management, system changes, and cross-enterprise execution, which makes Risk Management Process the best fit. Although it includes leader qualifications, those details support the description of the program's operation rather than making the paragraph mainly about the individuals themselves.


content_category: Management Role

reasoning: The paragraph is primarily about identified management personnel, their cybersecurity responsibilities, and especially their qualifications and experience, which makes Management Role the best fit. It includes multiple firm-specific role titles and quantified experience details, pushing specificity above generic or framework-only disclosure.


reasoning: The paragraph is primarily about the company's internal cybersecurity and incident response processes—who participates, how incidents are monitored and escalated, and how reporting flows through the organization. Although management roles like the CISO are named, the focus is on the function and operation of the cybersecurity program rather than the qualifications of an individual executive.


reasoning: The paragraph is primarily about named management personnel and their experience and responsibilities, especially the CIO, rather than the company's cybersecurity processes themselves. It includes firm-specific facts about a cybersecurity-specific role and that role's tenure/experience, but not two qualifying hard verifiable facts needed for Quantified-Verifiable.


reasoning: The paragraph primarily describes the company's internal cybersecurity operations and incident response process—who carries out monitoring, coordination, and reporting—rather than focusing on board oversight or the qualifications of an individual executive. It includes firm-specific organizational details such as the CISO-led team, the Incident Response Team composition, and named internal governance bodies.


reasoning: The paragraph is primarily about who is responsible for cybersecurity at management level and the qualifications of that role, which fits Management Role under the person-versus-function test. Although it also mentions board-level expertise through the Strategy Committee Chair, the main thrust is leadership credentials rather than board oversight mechanics.


reasoning: The paragraph is primarily about who is responsible for the company's information security program and the interim individual's experience, which makes Management Role the best fit. It includes a specific date and a quantified experience detail, pushing it beyond firm-specific disclosure.


reasoning: The paragraph is primarily about management personnel responsible for cybersecurity, emphasizing their roles, reporting structure, and qualifications rather than the company’s cyber processes. It identifies a CISO and details the experience and credentials of the management individuals involved.


reasoning: The paragraph primarily describes the company's internal cybersecurity risk management approach and the function of a management-level steering committee in assessing and mitigating cyber risks. It is not about board oversight or the qualifications of an individual executive, so Risk Management Process is the best fit.


reasoning: The paragraph primarily describes the company's internal governance and escalation process for managing cybersecurity risk, rather than focusing on board oversight or the qualifications of specific executives. It includes firm-specific named management committees and a named internal framework, which makes it Firm-Specific.