gold_category: Board Governance

reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Board Governance, plurality=Board Governance (6/9)

human_majority: Management Role

model_majority: Board Governance


gold_category: Management Role

reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Management Role (6/9)

model_majority: Risk Management Process


gold_category: Incident Disclosure

reason: 9/9 signals agree

human_majority: Incident Disclosure

model_majority: Incident Disclosure


gold_category: Risk Management Process

human_majority: Risk Management Process


model_majority: Management Role


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 2/3 (Management Role)


gold_category: Third-Party Risk

reason: Human + model majority agree

human_majority: Third-Party Risk

model_majority: Third-Party Risk


reason: 8/9 signals agree


human_majority: Board Governance


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 3/3 (Management Role)


gold_category: None/Other

reason: SI/NO override: Speculation: 'could potentially result in' -- no materiality assessment

human_majority: Strategy Integration

model_majority: None/Other


gold_category: Strategy Integration

model_majority: Strategy Integration


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=Management Role, plurality=Management Role (6/9)


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Board Governance, plurality=Management Role (3/4)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Incident Disclosure) vs human 2/3 (Strategy Integration)


reason: T5 codebook override: ID/SI: opens with 'no material incidents', Feb 2025 incident is brief context + 'has not had material impact' conclusion. Materiality assessment frame dominates


human_majority: None/Other


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 1/3 (Board Governance)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (None/Other) vs human 3/3 (Management Role)


reason: T5 codebook override: SI/ID tiebreaker: 'have not encountered any risks' -- materiality assessment, no specific incident described


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 2/3 (Third-Party Risk)


reason: SI/NO override: Resource lament: 'do not have manpower' -- no materiality assessment


reason: Mixed: human=Strategy Integration, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Strategy Integration (4/9)


reason: SI/NO override: SPAC with assessment at end -- SPAC rule dominates per Case 8


reason: 9/9 signals agree


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=Board Governance, plurality=Risk Management Process (4/6)


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Board Governance, plurality=Management Role (3/6)


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=Management Role, plurality=Management Role (5/9)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Board Governance) vs human 1/3 (None/Other)


reason: Human + model majority agree


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=Board Governance, plurality=Risk Management Process (3/4)


reason: 8/9 signals agree


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (6/9)


reason: SI/NO override: Speculation: 'could have material adverse effect' boilerplate


reason: T5 codebook override: SPAC: 'once the Company commences operations' -- pre-revenue company. Case 8: SPAC -> N/O regardless of management role language


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (5/9)


reason: SI/NO override: Risk list: 'A breach could lead to...' -- enumeration, not assessment


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Management Role (6/9)


reason: T5 codebook override: Board-removal: 'Board is also responsible' (1 sentence) + 'notifying the Board' (final clause). Remove -> CISO + IS Program + incident response plan. Process dominates


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Board Governance) vs human 2/3 (Risk Management Process)


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Board Governance, plurality=Board Governance (5/9)


reason: 9/9 signals agree


reason: Mixed: human=Board Governance, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (3/5)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 2/3 (Management Role)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Strategy Integration) vs human 1/3 (Board Governance)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 3/3 (Third-Party Risk)


reason: Mixed: human=Third-Party Risk, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (4/9)


reason: Human + model majority agree


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Board Governance) vs human 3/3 (Management Role)


reason: 8/9 signals agree


reason: SI/NO override: Cross-ref: 'We describe whether and how... under the headings [risk factors]'


reason: SI/NO override: Speculation: 'could materially adversely affect'


reason: SI/NO override: Negative assertion: 'not aware of having experienced any prior material data breaches'


reason: SI/NO override: Brief incident mention + 'See Item 1A' cross-reference


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (5/7)


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Board Governance, plurality=Risk Management Process (2/4)


reason: SI/NO override: Past disruption but no materiality language. Primarily speculation


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Board Governance, plurality=Management Role (3/4)


reason: 9/9 signals agree


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 2/3 (Third-Party Risk)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (None/Other) vs human 2/3 (Risk Management Process)


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Board Governance, plurality=Risk Management Process (4/9)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Board Governance) vs human 2/3 (Management Role)


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Management Role (3/6)


reason: Mixed: human=Incident Disclosure, model=Strategy Integration, plurality=Incident Disclosure (6/9)


reason: Human + model majority agree


reason: 8/9 signals agree


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=Board Governance, plurality=Risk Management Process (3/4)


reason: Mixed: human=Strategy Integration, model=Board Governance, plurality=Risk Management Process (2/5)


reason: SI/NO override: IT importance statement -- no assessment. H=1/3 SI


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Board Governance) vs human 2/3 (Risk Management Process)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 2/3 (Management Role)


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (4/9)


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Board Governance, plurality=Management Role (4/6)


reason: Mixed: human=Strategy Integration, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Strategy Integration (5/9)


reason: 9/9 signals agree


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 1/3 (Strategy Integration)


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (6/8)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 2/3 (Third-Party Risk)


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (6/9)


reason: T5 codebook override: SI/ID tiebreaker: 'ransomware attack in October 2021' -- describes specific incident with date


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=Board Governance, plurality=Risk Management Process (4/9)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 1/3 (Third-Party Risk)


reason: 8/9 signals agree


reason: Mixed: human=Strategy Integration, model=Incident Disclosure, plurality=Incident Disclosure (6/9)


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=Board Governance, plurality=Board Governance (6/9)


reason: Human + model majority agree


reason: SI/NO override: Cross-ref: 'We describe whether and how... under the heading [risk factor]'


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=Board Governance, plurality=Risk Management Process (4/6)


reason: SI/NO override: Cross-ref: 'In our Risk Factors, we describe whether and how...'


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=Management Role, plurality=Management Role (6/9)


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (4/9)


reason: 9/9 signals agree


reason: SI/NO override: Speculation: 'could...have a material adverse effect'


reason: SI/NO override: Risk enumeration: 'could lead to... could disrupt... could steal...'


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=None/Other, plurality=None/Other (5/9)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 2/3 (None/Other)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Board Governance) vs human 1/3 (Management Role)


reason: Mixed: human=None/Other, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (5/9)


reason: SI/NO override: Negative assertion: 'did not experience any cybersecurity incident during 2024'


reason: 8/9 signals agree


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (None/Other) vs human 1/3 (Risk Management Process)


reason: Mixed: human=Strategy Integration, model=Incident Disclosure, plurality=Incident Disclosure (5/9)


reason: Mixed: human=Board Governance, model=Management Role, plurality=Board Governance (5/9)


reason: Human + model majority agree


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Board Governance, plurality=Management Role (5/9)


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (5/9)


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=None/Other, plurality=Risk Management Process (4/9)


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=Board Governance, plurality=Board Governance (6/9)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 2/3 (Management Role)


reason: 9/9 signals agree


reason: Mixed: human=Board Governance, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (3/4)


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=None/Other, plurality=None/Other (5/9)


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=Board Governance, plurality=Board Governance (5/9)


reason: Mixed: human=None/Other, model=Board Governance, plurality=None/Other (3/5)


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Board Governance, plurality=Board Governance (4/9)


reason: Mixed: human=Strategy Integration, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Strategy Integration (4/9)


reason: 8/9 signals agree


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Board Governance) vs human 2/3 (Management Role)


reason: Mixed: human=Third-Party Risk, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (6/9)


reason: SI/NO override: Speculation: 'could adversely affect our business'


reason: T5 codebook override: Committee-level: Compliance Committee is management-level (O'Reilly executives). Board is incidental destination (2 clauses). Titled 'Management's Role'


reason: Human + model majority agree


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=Board Governance, plurality=Risk Management Process (4/9)


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (5/9)


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=Board Governance, plurality=Board Governance (6/9)


reason: Mixed: human=Board Governance, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (6/9)


reason: 9/9 signals agree


reason: SI/NO override: Speculation: 'could potentially have a material impact' -- Case 9 fix


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=Management Role, plurality=Management Role (6/9)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 2/3 (Third-Party Risk)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Board Governance) vs human 1/3 (Management Role)


reason: SI/NO override: Speculation: 'could disrupt our operations'


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 3/3 (Management Role)


reason: SI/NO override: Speculation: 'could materially adversely affect'


reason: 8/9 signals agree


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (6/9)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Board Governance) vs human 2/3 (Management Role)


reason: Mixed: human=Third-Party Risk, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (5/9)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Board Governance) vs human 3/3 (Management Role)


reason: Human + model majority agree


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Board Governance) vs human 2/3 (Risk Management Process)


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (5/9)


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Board Governance, plurality=Board Governance (5/9)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 2/3 (Management Role)


reason: 9/9 signals agree


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Management Role (4/9)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 2/3 (Third-Party Risk)


reason: SI/NO override: Early-stage/SPAC + weak negative assertion. SPAC rule dominates


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Board Governance, plurality=Risk Management Process (3/5)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 3/3 (Management Role)


reason: T5 codebook override: TP/RMP: Fund relies on CCO and adviser's risk management expertise -- third parties supporting internal process


reason: 8/9 signals agree


reason: T5 codebook override: Board-removal: remove notification sentence -> 'management oversees cybersecurity.' Board is incident notification destination only


reason: T5 codebook override: ID/SI: June 2018 incident is example within broader negative materiality assertion ('have not materially affected us'). Assessment frame dominates


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Incident Disclosure) vs human 1/3 (Third-Party Risk)


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Board Governance, plurality=Management Role (4/9)


reason: Mixed: human=Board Governance, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (6/9)


reason: Human + model majority agree


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (5/9)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Board Governance) vs human 2/3 (Management Role)


reason: SI/NO override: Risk enumeration -- no assessment. H=1/3 SI


reason: 9/9 signals agree


reason: Mixed: human=Incident Disclosure, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (5/9)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 2/3 (Board Governance)


reason: SI/NO override: Speculation: 'If compromised, we could be subject to...'


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=Board Governance, plurality=Risk Management Process (4/9)


reason: SI/NO override: Speculation: 'could have material adverse impact'


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 3/3 (Management Role)


reason: 8/9 signals agree


reason: Mixed: human=Incident Disclosure, model=Strategy Integration, plurality=Strategy Integration (6/9)


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=Board Governance, plurality=Risk Management Process (4/4)


reason: SI/NO override: Risk factor heading/cross-reference -- not an assessment


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (6/9)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Board Governance) vs human 1/3 (Management Role)


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=Board Governance, plurality=Risk Management Process (3/4)


reason: Human + model majority agree


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Board Governance) vs human 2/3 (Management Role)


reason: SI/NO override: Threat enumeration under SI-sounding header -- no assessment


reason: 9/9 signals agree


reason: T5 codebook override: ID/RMP: 'Following this cybersecurity event' -- refers to incident without describing it. 100% of content is hardening, training, MFA, EDR -- pure RMP


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=Board Governance, plurality=Risk Management Process (5/9)


reason: SI/NO override: Resource expenditure on cybersecurity -- RMP per person-removal test


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=Board Governance, plurality=Risk Management Process (3/3)


reason: Mixed: human=Strategy Integration, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Strategy Integration (5/9)


reason: Mixed: human=Management Role, model=Risk Management Process, plurality=Risk Management Process (5/9)


reason: 8/9 signals agree


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (Risk Management Process) vs human 1/3 (None/Other)


reason: 6/6 models unanimous (None/Other) vs human 2/3 (Risk Management Process)


reason: Mixed: human=Risk Management Process, model=None/Other, plurality=Risk Management Process (4/9)