reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal processes for managing cybersecurity incidents, including their Disaster Recovery Plan, Crisis Management Team, and various assessment and training activities.


content_category: Board Governance

category_confidence: high

specificity_confidence: high

reasoning: The paragraph focuses on Board/Audit Committee oversight of cybersecurity risk, with no company-specific details or verifiable facts.

provider: z-ai

stage: benchmark


reasoning: The paragraph focuses primarily on the Audit Committee's oversight responsibilities and processes, with management roles described in relation to board reporting.


content_category: Risk Management Process

reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal incident response plan and testing process, which clearly falls under Risk Management Process. It contains multiple specific facts about the company's internal programs, processes, and team compositions that make it Firm-Specific.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal cybersecurity risk management processes without providing any specific details unique to Grindr Inc.


content_category: Third-Party Risk

reasoning: The paragraph focuses entirely on vendor management processes and contractual security standards for third-party providers, with no company-specific details or verifiable facts.


content_category: Strategy Integration

reasoning: The paragraph focuses on forward-looking statements about financial impact and recovery from an incident without describing the incident itself, which aligns with Strategy Integration. It contains only generic boilerplate language with no company-specific details.


specificity_confidence: medium

reasoning: The paragraph focuses on materiality assessments and financial impact of cybersecurity risks, with a specific reference to the year 2023.


content_category: Incident Disclosure

reasoning: This paragraph describes a real cybersecurity incident including the date, nature of the attack (website defacement), company response, and ongoing actions, which clearly falls under Incident Disclosure.


reasoning: The paragraph primarily describes Alternus's internal cybersecurity processes, including threat assessment, protection activities, and third-party risk management as part of the overall framework, rather than focusing on vendor oversight as the central topic.


reasoning: This paragraph describes a real cybersecurity incident with specific details about what happened, how the information was obtained, and the company's response actions, which clearly falls under Incident Disclosure. The inclusion of a specific date (May 11, 2025) makes it Firm-Specific rather than generic boilerplate.


reasoning: The paragraph provides a detailed narrative of a cybersecurity incident including perpetrator identification, scope of access, affected accounts, and response actions, clearly falling under Incident Disclosure. It contains multiple hard verifiable facts including specific dates, account numbers, and monetary amounts that could be independently verified.


reasoning: The paragraph describes a real cybersecurity incident with specific details about unauthorized access, data exfiltration, business impact, and response actions, which clearly falls under Incident Disclosure. It contains a specific date (July 25, 2024) making it Firm-Specific rather than Generic Boilerplate.


reasoning: This paragraph discusses materiality assessments of cybersecurity threats without describing any specific incident, placing it in the Strategy Integration category. It contains no specific facts unique to Vivani Medical, making it Generic Boilerplate.


reasoning: The paragraph discusses the general business/financial impact of cybersecurity threats, which falls under Strategy Integration. It contains only generic risk language with no company-specific details.


reasoning: The paragraph describes a specific cybersecurity incident that occurred on May 1, 2024, including unauthorized access, encryption deployment, business impact, and response actions, which clearly falls under Incident Disclosure.


content_category: Management Role

reasoning: The paragraph describes management's responsibility for creating risk metrics, with management as the grammatical subject, fitting the Management Role category. It contains no specific facts that identify anything unique to this company.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's current lack of cybersecurity policies and dedicated personnel, which falls under Risk Management Process. It contains no specific facts, named standards, or verifiable details that would make it anything other than Generic Boilerplate.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal cybersecurity processes and controls without any company-specific details, named entities, or verifiable facts.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal audit and risk assessment processes, including specific roles and committees involved in reviewing results and implementing remediation plans.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal procedures for evaluating and managing cybersecurity risks, including integration with enterprise risk management and handling of third-party relationships as part of their overall framework.


reasoning: The paragraph primarily focuses on the CISO's role, reporting relationships, and collaboration with other executives, with board oversight mentioned as a secondary component.


reasoning: The paragraph primarily describes the company's internal risk management processes, including third-party risk assessments, incident response planning, and team composition, rather than focusing exclusively on vendor oversight as the central topic.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal cybersecurity program and risk management framework as part of their enterprise risk management approach, focusing on their own processes for assessing and managing cyber risks. It contains only generic descriptions of security practices with no company-specific details, named entities, or verifiable facts.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses entirely on the types of third-party service providers used for cybersecurity risk management, making Third-Party Risk the appropriate category. It contains no specific facts unique to Sweetgreen, resulting in a Generic Boilerplate specificity rating.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal process for investigating cybersecurity threats and responding to incidents, which falls under Risk Management Process. It contains no specific dates, dollar amounts, named third parties, or other verifiable facts, making it Generic Boilerplate.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal training process for cybersecurity risk management, but contains no specific details that would make it unique to this company.


reasoning: The paragraph describes JetBlue's internal cybersecurity strategy and priorities without any specific details, frameworks, or verifiable facts.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses entirely on the company's program for overseeing third-party service providers, making third-party risk the central topic. It contains no specific facts, dates, names, or standards that would elevate it above generic boilerplate.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses on the CISO and VP of Information Security, which are management roles, and includes specific details about their experience that make it firm-specific rather than generic.


reasoning: The paragraph describes management's roles and responsibilities for cybersecurity, with the management team as the grammatical subject, fitting the 'Management Role' category. It contains no specific facts, dates, or unique identifiers, making it Generic Boilerplate.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses on the board-level Risk Committee's oversight responsibilities for cybersecurity risks, making it Board Governance. It contains a named internal program (Cybersecurity Incident Response Plan) that makes it firm-specific.


reasoning: The paragraph discusses the company's lack of established processes for cybersecurity risk management, which falls under Risk Management Process. It contains no specific facts, dates, named entities, or standards, making it Generic Boilerplate.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses on the Audit Committee's oversight role for cybersecurity risks, which is a standard governance practice applicable to any company.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal incident response process without any specific details that would identify it uniquely from other companies.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal processes for onboarding new products, projects, and vendors with appropriate oversight, which falls under Risk Management Process. It contains no specific facts, dates, or named entities that would elevate it above Generic Boilerplate.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal cybersecurity awareness and training programs, which are standard risk management processes, with no unique details that would identify this as specific to Albany International.


reasoning: The paragraph discusses the company's assessment of its cybersecurity risk profile and the absence of risk management processes, which falls under Risk Management Process category.


reasoning: The paragraph discusses the company's risk-based approach to security controls and their inherent limitations, which falls under Risk Management Process. It contains no specific details that would make it unique to TTEC.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal cybersecurity risk management processes and improvement initiatives, focusing on how they address changing threats and conditions.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses on board oversight of cybersecurity risk, with the board as the grammatical subject, and contains no specific facts unique to Lipocine Inc.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses on the CISO and other specific management roles overseeing cybersecurity risk management, making 'Management Role' the appropriate category. The named management positions provide firm-specific details.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal risk mitigation processes including defense approaches, vulnerability management, and incident response planning, with no specific facts or named standards.


reasoning: The paragraph primarily describes BlackRock's internal cybersecurity risk management framework, controls, and processes, with third-party risk mentioned as one component rather than the central focus.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal cybersecurity risk assessment processes and mitigation strategies, focusing on their own frameworks and tools rather than board governance, management roles, or third-party relationships.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses on the Board of Directors' oversight role for cybersecurity risks, with no company-specific details beyond generic governance language.


reasoning: This is a standalone materiality assessment about cybersecurity threats with no incident reference, which falls under Strategy Integration. It contains only generic materiality language with no company-specific facts.


reasoning: The paragraph discusses the company's internal risk management approach and limitations of security controls, which falls under Risk Management Process. It contains no specific facts that identify this company, making it Generic Boilerplate.


content_category: None/Other

reasoning: This paragraph is a forward-looking disclaimer about potential cybersecurity risks with no substantive disclosure, making it 'None/Other' with Generic Boilerplate specificity.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal incident response and vulnerability management processes, with management roles and audit committee reporting as components of these processes rather than being the central focus.


reasoning: The paragraph consists entirely of forward-looking disclaimers and cross-references to risk factors with no substantive disclosure of actual incidents, governance structures, or specific internal processes.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal processes for vulnerability testing and vendor oversight, which falls under Risk Management Process. It contains no specific facts that would make it unique to Centuri Holdings.


reasoning: The paragraph describes EMCOR's internal cybersecurity governance structure and risk management processes, focusing on their established committees and organizational composition rather than board oversight, management roles, or incident details.


reasoning: The paragraph identifies specific management roles (CIO, CTO, Information Security Officer) as accountable for the Bank's information security program, which fits the Management Role category. The specificity is Firm-Specific due to the cybersecurity-specific title of 'Information Security Officer.'


reasoning: The paragraph focuses on management roles (Head of Cybersecurity, CFO, General Counsel) and their responsibilities for informing leadership about cybersecurity incidents, making 'Management Role' the appropriate category.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal process of evaluating cybersecurity program effectiveness through tabletop exercises, with third-party providers mentioned as a means to this end rather than as the central topic.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses on the Audit Committee's oversight responsibilities for cybersecurity risks, with the committee as the grammatical subject, making it Board Governance. It contains specific facts like the CISO role and named internal program that make it firm-specific rather than generic.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses on vendor due diligence and contractual security requirements for third parties handling sensitive information, making 'Third-Party Risk' the appropriate category. It contains the specific fact 'PSCM' which identifies a unique entity to this company's disclosure.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal cybersecurity monitoring and testing processes, with specific elements like the IS Program and OCC regulatory exams that are unique to this company.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal processes for assessing and managing cybersecurity risks, with third-party risk mentioned as one component rather than being the central focus.


reasoning: The paragraph describes Western Digital's internal ERM process for identifying and managing cybersecurity risks, with the management team and ERM process as the grammatical subjects.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal cybersecurity risk management processes including identification of critical systems, network segmentation, access controls, continuous monitoring, and patch management, without any specific details or named standards.


reasoning: The paragraph describes Teladoc Health's internal cybersecurity program and frameworks for managing risks, which falls under Risk Management Process. It names industry standards (HIPAA, NIST, HITRUST, SOC 2) but contains no company-specific details.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal technical security controls, which falls under Risk Management Process. It contains only generic security measures with no company-specific details.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses on the ISO's qualifications and experience, making 'Management Role' the appropriate category. It contains multiple specific facts about the ISO's role and experience, warranting a 'Firm-Specific' rating.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal cybersecurity assessment processes and collaborations, which falls under Risk Management Process. It contains no specific facts, frameworks, or named entities that would make it unique to AAON.


reasoning: This paragraph discusses materiality assessments of cybersecurity risks without describing any specific incident, which falls under Strategy Integration. It contains no specific facts that would make it unique to this company's disclosure.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses on third-party procurement and contracting procedures, which is central to vendor oversight, making it Third-Party Risk. It contains no specific facts that would make it unique to ESSA Pharma, making it Generic Boilerplate.


reasoning: The paragraph centers on the CISO role, qualifications, reporting lines, and responsibilities, making 'Management Role' the appropriate category. It contains multiple specific facts including a cybersecurity-specific title, specific experience duration, and named committee, meeting the threshold for Quantified-Verifiable.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal processes for cybersecurity incident response, escalation, and management, which falls under Risk Management Process rather than focusing on board governance, management roles, or actual incidents.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses entirely on third-party service provider risks and monitoring, with no specific details, dates, or named entities.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses on the qualifications and responsibilities of management roles (CCO and CISO) in cybersecurity risk management, with specific details about their experience and tenure.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses on the CIO's role, qualifications, and reporting structure, making Management Role the appropriate category. It contains firm-specific details about the CIO's position and reporting lines, though the experience description remains somewhat vague.


reasoning: The paragraph describes board oversight activities, with the Audit Committee receiving cybersecurity briefings and reviewing audit results, fitting the Board Governance category.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal process for assessing and responding to potential cybersecurity incidents, with specific committee composition and reporting lines.


reasoning: The paragraph discusses executive management's responsibility for cybersecurity strategy and risk oversight, making Management Role the appropriate category. It contains no specific facts, dates, or unique identifiers, making it Generic Boilerplate.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the oversight responsibilities of the Technology Committee, a board committee focused on technology strategy and cybersecurity risks, making it Board Governance. The named non-generic committee provides firm-specific detail.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal cybersecurity risk management processes, focusing on policies, programs, and controls implemented by the company to prevent, identify, and mitigate cyber incidents.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses on the Cybersecurity Council's role in ensuring board oversight of cybersecurity risks, with the council as the grammatical subject. It contains multiple firm-specific elements including named cybersecurity roles, detailed council membership composition, and specific internal programs that identify this as unique to PSEG.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses on the CISO's reporting structure and responsibilities, making 'Management Role' the appropriate category. It contains specific facts (CISO role and IOC committee) that identify it as Firm-Specific rather than generic boilerplate.


reasoning: The paragraph is a generic forward-looking disclaimer about potential cybersecurity risks without any substantive disclosure about the company's specific cybersecurity practices, governance, or incidents.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal cybersecurity risk management program, including risk assessments, policies, controls, and third-party oversight as components of the overall program.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the Audit Committee's role in cybersecurity oversight, with the committee as the grammatical subject. It contains no specific facts that would identify this disclosure as unique to Generation Bio Co.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's approach to risk assessment, which falls under Risk Management Process, but contains no specific facts or details unique to this company.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the responsibilities of a management role (VP of IT and Facilities) regarding cybersecurity, which is the grammatical subject and main focus.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal processes for cybersecurity awareness, training, policy updates, and control testing, which falls under Risk Management Process. It contains no specific facts, named entities, or frameworks that would make it anything other than Generic Boilerplate.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal cybersecurity risk management processes without any specific details that would identify this particular company's unique approach.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses on the activities of the company's cybersecurity professionals, making 'Management Role' the appropriate category. It contains only generic descriptions of security activities without any specific facts, standards, or verifiable details.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal incident response process and risk mitigation efforts, focusing on their own policies and procedures rather than board governance, management roles, or third-party risk as a central topic.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal cybersecurity processes and monitoring capabilities without mentioning any specific incidents, board oversight, or management roles.


reasoning: The paragraph describes governance roles (Board, CIO, Director of IT, and ERM group) in cybersecurity risk management, making 'Board Governance' the most appropriate category.