reasoning: The paragraph's central focus is the company's internal cybersecurity program and processes for assessing and managing cybersecurity risks, with board oversight and management roles as supporting details rather than core topics, so it falls under Risk Management Process. Third-party risk is only mentioned as a component of the broader internal risk program, not the central subject.


content_category: Risk Management Process

category_confidence: high

specificity_confidence: high

reasoning: This paragraph details Apollo's internal, company-wide cybersecurity program components that integrate with its enterprise risk management framework, with third-party oversight as only one component of the broader internal process, so it is classified as Risk Management Process.

provider: bytedance-seed

stage: benchmark


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal cybersecurity risk management processes, including monitoring, access controls, vulnerability testing, and third-party risk tracking as a component of its broader internal security practices, so it is classified as Risk Management Process.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal cybersecurity processes including framework adoption, risk assessment, monitoring, and incident response planning, which aligns with the Risk Management Process category.


content_category: Board Governance

reasoning: The paragraph's core content details the Board of Directors and Audit Committee's oversight responsibilities for cybersecurity risks, with these board entities as the primary grammatical subjects, aligning with the Board Governance category. No unique firm-specific or verifiable quantitative facts are included, so it qualifies as generic boilerplate.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal technical, organizational, and process-based cybersecurity risk mitigation and management practices, which aligns with the Risk Management Process category.


reasoning: This paragraph details Riot Platforms' internal cybersecurity monitoring tools, response protocols, and future cyber defense strategy, which falls under Risk Management Process as it centers on the company's own internal cyber risk management activities, with third-party services only referenced as a minor component of these processes.


content_category: Management Role

reasoning: This paragraph focuses entirely on the identities, qualifications, and cybersecurity oversight responsibilities of company management leaders, so it is classified as Management Role.


reasoning: The paragraph primarily details Schwab's internal cybersecurity risk management processes, including system monitoring, access controls, and third-party risk assessments, which fits the Risk Management Process category.


content_category: Strategy Integration

reasoning: This paragraph includes a standalone materiality conclusion about general past cybersecurity incidents and forward-looking risk statements, which aligns with the Strategy Integration category for materiality assessments with no specific incident narrative.


reasoning: This paragraph includes a standalone materiality assessment of cybersecurity incidents for the company's 2024 fiscal year, alongside discussion of potential future financial and operational impacts of cyber threats, which falls under the Strategy Integration category.


reasoning: This paragraph primarily describes Jamf's internal cybersecurity risk management program, including its policies and processes to assess and mitigate cyber threats, which fits the Risk Management Process category. No unique firm-specific facts or named security frameworks are present, resulting in a Generic Boilerplate specificity rating.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal processes for identifying, assessing, and managing cybersecurity risks, which falls directly into the Risk Management Process category. It contains no firm-unique facts or named standards, so it qualifies as generic boilerplate.


reasoning: This paragraph centers on management roles (CISO, CCO, Bain Capital's Information Security Team) as its primary grammatical subjects, detailing their cybersecurity-related responsibilities, qualifications, and reporting lines, so it is assigned to the Management Role category.


reasoning: This paragraph centers on Northern Trust's internal cybersecurity and technology risk management program, governance structure, and internal policies, with third-party vendor review only a minor component of its broader internal risk practices, so it is classified as Risk Management Process.


reasoning: This paragraph centers on BioAge Labs' internal cybersecurity risk assessment, monitoring, incident response, and enterprise risk integration processes, with third-party risk management only addressed as a supporting component of internal workflows, so it qualifies for the Risk Management Process category.


reasoning: This paragraph details USCF's internal cybersecurity risk management processes for the Trust, including its information security program and annual risk assessments, with third-party due diligence as a supporting component of these internal processes, aligning with the Risk Management Process category.


reasoning: This paragraph's primary focus is identifying core management roles responsible for cybersecurity and detailing their professional qualifications, aligning with the Management Role category; board reporting is only a secondary, minor component of the disclosure.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses on the company's internal, company-wide cybersecurity risk management program, including general oversight by the board and management, which aligns with the Risk Management Process category. No specific incident, central third-party vendor focus, or standalone board governance is the primary subject of the text.


reasoning: This paragraph primarily details Embecta's internal cybersecurity risk management processes, including continuous monitoring, multi-layered defenses, framework adoption, and policy reviews. Third-party vendor oversight is only a component of the company's broader internal risk management program, not its central focus.


reasoning: This paragraph details Montrose's internal cybersecurity risk management workflows, including its incident response plan, risk assessment activities, and mitigation procedures, which falls under the Risk Management Process category. No single alternative category is the central focus of the text, as third-party engagement is only a component of its broader internal processes.


reasoning: The paragraph's primary focus is describing the company's internal cybersecurity risk assessment and management programs, which aligns with the Risk Management Process category, with a secondary materiality conclusion included. No unique firm-specific details or named standards are present in the text.


reasoning: This paragraph centers on the roles, responsibilities, and qualifications of the company's executive management team members who lead cybersecurity oversight, so it is classified as Management Role.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal cybersecurity risk management processes, including governance policies, internal controls, and third-party risk assessment as part of its broader internal risk framework. Third-party risk is only a component of the company's overall internal processes, so it is classified as Risk Management Process rather than Third-Party Risk.


reasoning: The paragraph's core topic is the board of directors and its Audit Committee's oversight of cybersecurity risk management, with management responsibilities referenced as a secondary component, which aligns with the Board Governance category.


reasoning: This paragraph exclusively describes Southwest's internal cybersecurity program, risk assessment workflows, monitoring capabilities, and mitigation practices, which aligns perfectly with the Risk Management Process content category.


reasoning: This paragraph centers on the qualifications, responsibilities, and supporting management structure for the Company's Chief Technology Officer, a senior IT leadership role, which aligns perfectly with the Management Role content category. The text does not reference board oversight, third-party risks, active incidents, or standalone risk processes, so no other category applies.


reasoning: This paragraph details WTW's internal cybersecurity risk management processes including incident response, technical safeguards, employee training, and threat intelligence, with third-party risk only included as one component of internal processes, so it is classified as Risk Management Process.


content_category: Third-Party Risk

reasoning: This paragraph's central focus is cybersecurity oversight of third-party service providers, including the company's vendor management program and contractual security obligations for vendors, which matches the Third-Party Risk category definition.


content_category: None/Other

reasoning: This paragraph contains only a standard forward-looking statement disclaimer with no substantive cybersecurity disclosure, so it is categorized as None/Other.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal cybersecurity risk mitigation processes, with vendor risk management included only as a minor component of broader internal risk management, aligning with the Risk Management Process category.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal cybersecurity risk management operations, including its incident response plan, annual testing protocols, and cross-functional exercise structure, which aligns with the Risk Management Process category.


reasoning: This paragraph details Old Republic's internal cybersecurity risk management processes, including subsidiary security program requirements, enterprise-level oversight teams, and incident escalation workflows, which aligns with the Risk Management Process category.


reasoning: This paragraph's core focus is the Audit Committee of Kroger's Board of Directors and its oversight of cybersecurity risks, including briefing cadences and cybersecurity-related reporting to the full board, which aligns perfectly with the Board Governance category.


reasoning: This paragraph details Ardent Health's internal cybersecurity processes, including third-party vendor vetting, threat detection, and incident response planning, with vendor oversight as one component of broader internal risk management rather than the sole central topic, so it is classified as Risk Management Process.


reasoning: This paragraph contains only a standalone materiality assessment of cybersecurity risks with no incident narrative, qualifying it for the Strategy Integration category. The text only uses generic boilerplate language with no firm-unique or verifiable specific facts.


reasoning: This paragraph details First Capital Inc's internal cybersecurity processes, including its documented disaster recovery plan, cross-functional incident coordination structure, security tooling, and independent audit activities, which aligns with the Risk Management Process category.


content_category: Incident Disclosure

reasoning: This paragraph details the timeline, operational impacts, and response actions for a confirmed real cybersecurity incident affecting Wytec's website, so it qualifies as Incident Disclosure.


specificity_confidence: medium

reasoning: This paragraph addresses the materiality of cybersecurity risks, discusses limitations of the company's cybersecurity insurance coverage, and references risk factors for potential business and financial impacts, aligning with the Strategy Integration category.


reasoning: The paragraph focuses on the Board and its Audit Committee's oversight of cybersecurity risks, with board-level bodies as the primary grammatical subjects, aligning perfectly with the Board Governance category.


reasoning: This paragraph details a real, active cybersecurity incident, including its scope of unauthorized access, data exfiltration, operational disruptions, and response measures, which aligns with the Incident Disclosure category.


reasoning: This paragraph describes a real, disclosed cybersecurity incident and its updates, including investigation outcomes, scope of compromised accounts, and a customer compensation program, which meets the criteria for Incident Disclosure.


reasoning: This paragraph describes the company's current internal state of cybersecurity policies and processes, along with future plans to develop more robust capabilities, so it falls under the Risk Management Process category.


reasoning: This paragraph details a confirmed, real cybersecurity incident, including its detection date, scope of unauthorized access, operational disruptions, and response actions, which aligns with the Incident Disclosure category.


reasoning: The paragraph centers on senior management's cybersecurity risk management responsibilities as the primary topical subject, which aligns with the Management Role category definition.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal workflows for investigating potential cybersecurity incidents, assessing threat severity, and coordinating response actions, which aligns with the Risk Management Process category. All language is generic and could be used in any company's filing.


reasoning: This paragraph only contains generic, high-level hypothetical statements about potential cybersecurity risks with no substantive, specific disclosures of governance, internal processes, incidents, or management roles, fitting the None/Other category.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal cybersecurity risk management activities, including technical safeguards, vulnerability assessments, and an incident response plan, which falls under the Risk Management Process category.


reasoning: This paragraph focuses on the company's internal cybersecurity risk management program and associated processes, with third-party oversight only referenced as a minor component of its internal framework, so it falls under the Risk Management Process category.


reasoning: The paragraph describes the company's internal mandatory information security training for associates, which is an internal cybersecurity risk management practice, qualifying it for the Risk Management Process category.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal cybersecurity audit, risk assessment, and remediation workflows, which qualify as Risk Management Process, as third-party firms are only a supporting component rather than the central focus of the disclosure.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal processes for evaluating and managing cybersecurity risks as part of its enterprise risk management program, so it is classified as Risk Management Process. Third-party risk is only a minor component of these internal processes rather than the central focus of the paragraph.


reasoning: The paragraph centers entirely on management's operational cybersecurity responsibilities, with management roles as the core subject, justifying the Management Role category assignment.


reasoning: This paragraph details a confirmed real cybersecurity incident, including its timeline, unauthorized access method, and the company's response actions, which meets all criteria for the Incident Disclosure category.


reasoning: The paragraph describes JetBlue's internal cybersecurity strategy and approach to managing cyber risks, which falls under the Risk Management Process category. No unique or verifiable firm-specific facts are present, resulting in a generic boilerplate specificity rating.


reasoning: This paragraph primarily describes Alternus Clean Energy's internal cybersecurity risk management practices, with third-party risk oversight only a component of broader internal processes rather than the central topic, so it falls under the Risk Management Process category.


reasoning: The paragraph's grammatical subject is the board's Audit Committee, whose core activities described are cybersecurity risk oversight, receiving regular security updates from management, and governing incident response processes, which aligns with the Board Governance category.


reasoning: The entire paragraph is centrally focused on cybersecurity oversight of the company's third-party service providers, including assessment protocols and contractual compliance requirements, so it qualifies for Third-Party Risk.


reasoning: The paragraph centers on two internal cybersecurity-focused management roles (CISO, VP of Information Security) and their professional qualifications, which falls under the Management Role category.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal incident response plan, a core internal cybersecurity process, so it falls under the Risk Management Process category. No firm-unique or verifiable specific facts are included, so the content qualifies as generic boilerplate.


reasoning: This paragraph describes the company's internal process for identifying, assessing, and managing cybersecurity risks by using generic third-party service providers to support those efforts, which aligns with the Risk Management Process category. No unique firm-specific or verifiable facts are included in the disclosure.


reasoning: This paragraph centers on the reporting lines, responsibilities, and cross-functional collaboration of the CISO, CIO, and CTO—senior management roles—for the company's cybersecurity program, fitting the Management Role category. Board oversight is only briefly referenced, making management roles the core focus.


reasoning: This paragraph centers on the company's internal cybersecurity risk assessment and management practices (specifically their lack of established processes), which aligns with the Risk Management Process category that covers internal company risk-related procedures.


reasoning: This paragraph contains a standalone materiality assessment concluding the blank check company faces no significant cybersecurity risk, which aligns with the Strategy Integration category for cybersecurity disclosures.


reasoning: The paragraph’s sole grammatical subject and focus is the board-level Risk Committee, which oversees the company’s cybersecurity risk governance and reporting for the full board, fitting the Board Governance category perfectly.


reasoning: The paragraph centers on the Board of Directors as its grammatical subject, detailing its oversight of the company's cybersecurity risks, program controls, and annual cybersecurity updates, which aligns perfectly with the Board Governance category.


reasoning: This paragraph focuses on TTEC's internal risk-based approach to implementing cybersecurity controls, which qualifies as Risk Management Process, as third-party references are only peripheral and not the central topic.


reasoning: This paragraph contains only a standalone materiality assessment of cybersecurity risks with no incident description or other substantive operational disclosures, so it is classified as Strategy Integration.


reasoning: This paragraph centers on management roles, led by the CISO, that oversee and collaborate on the company's cybersecurity risk management, which fits the Management Role category.


reasoning: This paragraph describes the company's internal cross-team security oversight workflows for onboarding new initiatives, qualifying as Risk Management Process because vendor oversight is only one component of the broader internal process, not its central focus.


reasoning: The paragraph centers on the board of directors' oversight of cybersecurity risks, including periodic reviews of the company's cybersecurity risk profile with management, so it is classified as Board Governance. The text contains no unique firm-specific details or named industry standards, qualifying it as Generic Boilerplate.


reasoning: This paragraph describes the company's internal cybersecurity risk mitigation processes including multi-layered infrastructure defense, software updates for vulnerabilities, and incident response planning, which falls under the Risk Management Process category.


reasoning: This paragraph contains a standalone materiality assessment of cybersecurity risks with no described actual incident, which qualifies for the Strategy Integration content category.


reasoning: The paragraph primarily details the company's internal cybersecurity risk management practices, including employee security training and phishing testing, which falls under the Risk Management Process category.


reasoning: This paragraph focuses on the company's internal cybersecurity risk management objectives and periodic internal review workflows, which qualifies it for the Risk Management Process category. The core content centers on the organization's own internal cyber risk oversight practices, with no competing category being more applicable.


reasoning: This paragraph consists solely of forward-looking risk warnings and a cross-reference to Item 1A's risk factors, with no substantive cybersecurity disclosures, qualifying it for the None/Other category.


reasoning: This paragraph describes the company's internal practices for evaluating its cybersecurity program, where third-party service providers are only a minor component of internal processes rather than the central topic, so it falls under Risk Management Process.


reasoning: This paragraph covers the company's internal risk-based approach to prioritizing and implementing cybersecurity controls, which fits the Risk Management Process category as it describes internal cyber risk mitigation processes.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal cybersecurity incident response and vulnerability management escalation workflows, so it is classified as Risk Management Process, as the core topic is the company's internal cyber risk management procedures.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal cybersecurity risk assessment and mitigation processes, which falls under Risk Management Process. The content exclusively covers the company's own internal procedures for managing cyber risks, with no central focus on third parties, governance roles, or a specific cybersecurity incident.


reasoning: This paragraph details BlackRock's internal cybersecurity risk management processes, including governance structures, operational controls, incident response planning, and third-party risk oversight as components of its broader enterprise risk program, fitting the Risk Management Process category.


reasoning: This paragraph uses cybersecurity-focused management roles as its grammatical subjects, detailing their core oversight responsibilities for the company's information security program, which aligns perfectly with the Management Role content category.


reasoning: This paragraph details EMCOR's internal cybersecurity program and dedicated internal committees that manage cyber risks, protect information systems, and coordinate incident response, which aligns with the Risk Management Process category focused on the company's own internal cyber risk workflows.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal cybersecurity risk management practices, including vulnerability testing and secondary vendor control reviews as part of its core internal processes, so it is classified as Risk Management Process.


reasoning: This paragraph centers on the company's Head of Cybersecurity, a senior cybersecurity management role, detailing its incident oversight and internal reporting responsibilities, which fits the Management Role category.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal cybersecurity program and risk mitigation workflows, falling under the Risk Management Process category as it centers on the company's own internal security processes with no other primary topic.


reasoning: The paragraph details the company's internal cybersecurity risk assessment and mitigation processes, with third-party risk oversight included as a component of its broader internal processes, so it is classified as Risk Management Process.


reasoning: This paragraph outlines the company's internal technical cybersecurity safeguards to protect its information systems, which falls under the Risk Management Process category as it describes the firm's own internal cybersecurity practices.


reasoning: This paragraph's core focus is the Board of Directors' Audit Committee, which is assigned primary responsibility for cybersecurity risk oversight, reporting cadences, and incident-related governance, aligning directly with the Board Governance category.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal enterprise risk management process for identifying, assessing, and mitigating cybersecurity risks, which falls under the Risk Management Process category. The content describes general internal risk governance structures that could be applied to nearly any company, resulting in a Generic Boilerplate specificity rating.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal cybersecurity monitoring, testing, and patching processes, so it qualifies as Risk Management Process; third-party vendors are only a supporting component of internal operations rather than the central topic.


reasoning: This paragraph outlines internal roles and groups responsible for the company's cybersecurity risk management program, which qualifies as a description of internal risk management processes, so it is assigned to the Risk Management Process category.


reasoning: This paragraph details AAON's internal cybersecurity processes for program assessment, incident preparedness, and threat information sharing, which qualifies as Risk Management Process; third-party stakeholders are only a component of internal processes, not the central topic.


reasoning: This paragraph contains a standalone materiality assessment of cybersecurity risks with no narrative of an actual incident, which aligns with the Strategy Integration category. All language in the paragraph is generic and could be applied to any company's filing.


reasoning: This paragraph focuses exclusively on internal management roles responsible for the company's cybersecurity operations, including their relevant professional qualifications and experience, which aligns with the Management Role category.


reasoning: The paragraph's sole central topic is third-party vendor oversight via procurement and contracting due diligence, placing it in the Third-Party Risk category. It contains no unique firm-specific details or named recognized standards, so it qualifies as generic boilerplate.


reasoning: This paragraph centers on the responsibilities, qualifications, and tenures of the Fund's CCO and Fidelity's CISO, both management roles overseeing cybersecurity risk, which directly aligns with the Management Role category.


reasoning: This paragraph's central topic is third-party vendor oversight: the company conducts pre-engagement security due diligence on vendors storing sensitive company data and requires those vendors to meet contractual security standards, placing it in the Third-Party Risk category. The trailing materiality statement is a secondary add-on that does not shift the core focus of the paragraph.


reasoning: The paragraph's sole central focus is cybersecurity risks tied to the company's reliance on third-party service providers and its monitoring of those vendor risks, fitting the Third-Party Risk category perfectly with no competing topics.


reasoning: The paragraph's core focus is the CIO, an executive management role, including their leadership of the information security function, reporting line, and program responsibilities, which fits the Management Role category.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal cybersecurity risk management policies, programs, and controls, so it is classified as Risk Management Process. Third-party risk assessment is only a minor component of these internal processes, not the central topic of the paragraph.


reasoning: This paragraph details Xenon Pharmaceuticals' internal cybersecurity risk management program, including annual risk assessments, control implementation, and program effectiveness reviews, so it falls under Risk Management Process. Third-party risk management is only a component of the broader internal program, not the central focus.


reasoning: This paragraph details Teladoc's internal cybersecurity program, including its internal and external risk assessments, adopted industry frameworks, and active third-party validated compliance certifications, which are the company's own internal processes for managing cyber risk, so it falls under Risk Management Process.


reasoning: The paragraph's grammatical subject is the company's executive management, a management body tasked with cybersecurity risk and strategy oversight, which fits the Management Role category. The incomplete text contains no unique firm-specific details to elevate its specificity.


reasoning: This paragraph describes the company's internal workflow for triaging potential cybersecurity incidents, which aligns with the Risk Management Process category as it details a core internal risk assessment procedure.


reasoning: The paragraph’s grammatical subject is the VP of IT and Facilities, a company management role, with its cybersecurity-specific responsibilities as the core topic, so it is classified under Management Role.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal planned cybersecurity activities including employee awareness training, policy updates, and security control testing, which qualify as internal risk management processes.


reasoning: The paragraph’s primary grammatical and thematic subject is the board’s Technology Committee, which is tasked with cybersecurity risk oversight, aligning perfectly with the Board Governance category. No competing category applies as all content focuses on board-level committee governance.


reasoning: This paragraph centers entirely on the company's CISO, a senior management role, detailing their qualifications, reporting structure, and cybersecurity oversight responsibilities, so it is correctly categorized as Management Role.


reasoning: The paragraph's grammatical subject is the board-level Audit Committee, which is described as providing direct oversight of cybersecurity risk, so it qualifies for the Board Governance category. No unique firm-specific or verifiable hard facts are present in the text.


reasoning: This paragraph details Celestica's internal cyber incident response workflows, including escalation protocols and cross-functional leadership responsibilities for managing potential breaches, which aligns with the Risk Management Process category as it covers the company's proprietary internal risk management processes.


reasoning: This paragraph discusses the company’s lack of formal internal cybersecurity risk assessment processes and hypothetical future risk mitigation steps, which falls under the Risk Management Process content category.


reasoning: This paragraph contains only generic forward-looking risk warnings about potential cybersecurity impacts with no substantive cybersecurity governance, process, or incident disclosures, so it is classified as None/Other.


reasoning: This paragraph centers on a specific organizational management role (the Senior Director of Information Technology) and its required cybersecurity reporting activities, which aligns with the Management Role content category.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal cybersecurity risk management workflows, with third-party service reviews included as a component of those internal processes rather than the central topic, aligning with the Risk Management Process category.


reasoning: The paragraph details the company's internal cybersecurity activities including threat monitoring and risk mitigation, which aligns with the Risk Management Process category, as it centers on the company's own internal cyber risk handling practices.


reasoning: The paragraph centers on the CISO, a senior cybersecurity management role, detailing their reporting cadence to the IOC committee and oversight of their internal team, which aligns with the Management Role category. Board oversight of cybersecurity is only a brief component of the paragraph, with the CISO's responsibilities as the core focus.


reasoning: This paragraph describes the company's internal cybersecurity threat awareness, preparedness testing, and monitoring processes, which fall under Risk Management Process as the central topic is the company's own internal cyber risk management activities.


reasoning: This paragraph details the company's internal standardized incident response and risk mitigation protocols for cybersecurity events, which falls under the Risk Management Process category, as it focuses on the company's own internal processes rather than incidents, board oversight, or vendor-focused requirements.


reasoning: This paragraph details PSEG's internal cybersecurity risk oversight processes, including the structure, activities, and cross-functional membership of its internal Cybersecurity Council, which qualifies as the company's own internal risk management processes for cyber risk.