UNITED STATES

 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

 Washington, D.C. 20549

 FORM 10-K

 Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.

 or

 Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 for the transition period from
to.

 Commission File Number: 001-41910

 ARK
21Shares Bitcoin ETF

 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 Delaware

 87-6497023

 (State or other jurisdiction of

 (I.R.S. Employer

 incorporation or organization)

 Identification No.)

 477 Madison Avenue, 6th Floor

 New York, New York, 10022

 (646) 370-6016

 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of registrant's primary executive offices)

 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 Title of each class:

 Trading Symbol(s)

 Name of each exchange on which registered:

 Shares of Beneficial Interests of ARK

21Shares Bitcoin ETF

 ARKB

 Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.

 Securities registered or to be registered pursuant
to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.

 Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a
well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No

 Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not
required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No

(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No

has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405
of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
 Yes No

is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.
See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer", "smaller reporting company"
and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 Large Accelerated Filer

 Accelerated Filer

 Non-Accelerated Filer

 Smaller Reporting Company

 Emerging Growth Company

 If an emerging growth company, indicate by check
mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided in Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial
reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or
issued its audit report.

 If securities are registered pursuant to Section
12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction
of an error to previously issued financial statements.

 Indicate by check mark whether any of those error
corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant's
executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).

is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.). Yes No

 The registrant
was not a public company as of June 30, 2023, the last business day of its most recently completed second fiscal quarter, and
therefore, cannot calculate the aggregate market value of its voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of such date.
The registrant's shares began trading on the Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. on January 11, 2024.

 The registrant had 39,790,000 outstanding shares
as of March 18, 2024.

 DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

 None.

 STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 This annual report on Form
10-K includes "forward-looking statements" that generally relate to future events or future performance. In some cases, you
can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "expect,"
"intend," "plan," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "predict,"
"potential" or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. All statements (other than statements of historical
fact) included in this report that address activities, events or developments that will or may occur in the future, including such matters
as movements in the digital asset markets and indexes that track such movements, the Trust's operations, the Sponsor's plans
and references to the Trust's future success and other similar matters, are forward-looking statements. These statements are only
predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially. These statements are based upon certain assumptions and analyses the Sponsor
and the Sub-Adviser have made based on its perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well
as other factors appropriate in the circumstances.

 Whether or not actual results
and developments will conform to the Sponsor and the Sub-Adviser's expectations and predictions, however, is subject to a number
of risks and uncertainties, including the special considerations discussed in this report, general economic, market and business conditions,
changes in laws or regulations, including those concerning taxes, made by governmental authorities or regulatory bodies, and other world
economic and political developments. Consequently, all the forward-looking statements made in this report are qualified by these
cautionary statements, and there can be no assurance that actual results or developments the Sponsor and the Sub-Adviser anticipate to
occur will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will result in the expected consequences to, or have the expected
effects on, the Trust's operations or the value of its Shares.

 Should one or more of these
risks discussed in "Risk Factors" or other uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual
outcomes may vary materially from those described in forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are made based on the Sponsor's
and the Sub-Adviser's beliefs, estimates and opinions on the date the statements are made, and neither the Trust, the Sponsor nor
the Sub-Adviser is under a duty or undertakes an obligation to update forward-looking statements if these beliefs, estimates and opinions
or other circumstances should change, other than as required by applicable laws. Moreover, neither the Trust, the Sponsor, the Sub-Adviser,
nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of any of these forward-looking statements. Investors are
therefore cautioned against placing undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

 Emerging
Growth Company

 The Trust is an "emerging
growth company" as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the "JOBS Act"). For as long as the Trust
is an emerging growth company, unlike other public companies, it will not be required to, among other things: (i) provide an auditor's
attestation report on management's assessment of the effectiveness of our system of internal control over financial reporting pursuant
to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; or (ii) comply with any new audit rules adopted by the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board ("PCAOB") after April 5, 2012, unless the SEC determines otherwise.

 The Trust will cease to be
an "emerging growth company" upon the earliest of: (i) it having $1.235 billion or more in annual revenues, (ii) at
least $700 million in market value of Common Shares being held by non-affiliates, (iii) it issuing more than $1.0 billion
of non-convertible debt over a three-year period; or (iv) the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary
of its initial public offering.

 In addition, Section 107
of the JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B)
of the 1933 Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption
of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. The Trust intends to take advantage
of the benefits of the extended transition period.

 ark 21shares
Bitcoin ETF

 Table of
Contents

 Page

 Item 1. Business

 Item 1A. Risk Factors

 Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

 Item 1C. Cybersecurity

 Item 2. Properties

 Item 3. Legal Proceedings

 Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

 Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 Item 6. [Reserved]

 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

 Item 9B. Other Information

 Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

 Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 Item 11. Executive Compensation

 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

 Glossary

 Signatures

 i

 Item 1. Business

 DESCRIPTION OF THE TRUST

 The ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
(the "Trust") is an exchange-traded fund that issues common shares of beneficial interest (the "Shares") that
trade on the Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the "Exchange") under the symbol "ARKB." The Trust's investment objective
is to seek to track the performance of bitcoin, as measured by the performance of the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant
(the "Index"), adjusted for the Trust's expenses and other liabilities. In seeking to achieve its investment objective,
the Trust holds bitcoin and values its Shares daily based on the Index. 21Shares US LLC (the "Sponsor") is the sponsor of
the Trust and Delaware Trust Company (the "Trustee") is the trustee of the Trust. The Bank of New York Mellon ("BNYM")
serves as the Trust's Administrator, Transfer Agent, and the Cash Custodian. Coinbase Custody Trust Company, LLC ("Coinbase
Custody") (the "Bitcoin Custodian") is the bitcoin custodian for the Trust and holds all the Trust's bitcoin on
the Trust's behalf. ARK Investment Management LLC (the "Sub-Adviser") is the sub-adviser of the Trust and aids in the
marketing of the Shares.

 The Trust is an exchange-traded
fund. The Trust does not purchase or sell bitcoin other than in connection with the creation and redemption of Shares or to pay certain
expenses, which are facilitated by the Prime Broker, or any other prime brokers with whom the Trust contracts.

 The Trust is not managed like
a corporation or an active investment vehicle. It does not have any officers, directors, or employees. The Trust is not registered as
an investment company under the 1940 Act and is not required to register under such act. The Trust does not and will not hold or trade
in commodity futures contracts regulated under the Commodity Exchange Act ("CEA"). The Trust is not a commodity pool for purposes
of the CEA and none of the Sponsor, Trustee or the Marketing Agent is subject to regulation by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
as a commodity pool operator or a commodity trading advisor under the CEA in connection with the shares. The Sponsor is not registered
with the SEC as an investment adviser and is not subject to regulation by the SEC as such in connection with its activities with respect
to the Trust.

 organization

 The Trust is a Delaware statutory
trust, formed on June 22, 2021, pursuant to the Delaware Statutory Trust Act ("DSTA"). The Trust continuously issues Shares
that may be purchased and sold on the Exchange. The Trust operates pursuant to the Trust Agreement. Delaware Trust Company, a Delaware
trust company, is the Delaware trustee of the Trust. The Trust is managed and controlled by the Sponsor. The Sponsor is a limited liability
company formed in the state of Delaware on June 16, 2021.

 The number of outstanding
Shares is expected to increase and decrease from time to time because of the creation and redemption of Baskets. The creation and redemption
of Baskets requires the delivery to the Trust or the distribution by the Trust of the amount of cash equivalent to the amount of bitcoin
represented by the NAV of the Baskets being created or redeemed. The total amount of bitcoin required for the creation of Baskets is based
on the combined net assets represented by the number of Baskets being created or redeemed.

 The Trust and the Sponsor
face competition with respect to the creation of competing products, such as exchange-traded products offering exposure to the spot bitcoin
market or other digital assets. There can be no assurance that the Trust will grow to or maintain an economically viable size. There is
no guarantee that the Sponsor will maintain a commercial advantage relative to competitors offering similar products. Whether or not the
Trust is successful in achieving its intended scale may be impacted by a range of factors, such as the Trust's timing in entering
the market and its fee structure relative to those of competitive products.

 The Trust has no fixed termination
date.

 DESCRIPTION OF THE SHARES

 Each Share represents a fractional
undivided beneficial interest in the net assets of the Trust. Upon redemption of the Shares, the applicable Authorized Participant is
paid solely out of the funds and property of the Trust. The assets of the Trust consist primarily of bitcoin held by the Bitcoin Custodian
on behalf of the Trust and cash. Creation Units are redeemed by the Trust in exchange for an amount of bitcoin or cash equal to the amount
of bitcoin represented by the aggregate number of Shares redeemed.

 The Trust is a passive investment
vehicle and is not a leveraged product. The Sponsor does not actively manage the bitcoin held by the Trust. The bitcoin held by the Trust
will only be sold (1) on an as-needed basis to pay the Trust's expenses and to meet redemption requests, (2) in the event the Trust
terminates and liquidates its assets, or (3) as otherwise required by law or regulation. The sale of bitcoin by the Trust is a taxable
event to shareholders (the "Shareholders").

 Under the Declaration of Trust,
Shareholders have no voting rights except as the Sponsor may consider desirable and so authorize in its sole discretion.

 The Sponsor may terminate
the Trust in its sole discretion. The Sponsor will give written notice of the termination of the Trust, specifying the date of termination,
to Shareholders of the Trust, at least 30 days prior to the termination of the Trust. The Sponsor will, within a reasonable time after
such termination, sell all the Trust's bitcoin not already distributed to Authorized Participants redeeming Creation Units, if any,
in such a manner to effectuate orderly sales. The Sponsor shall not be liable for or responsible in any way for depreciation or loss incurred
by reason of any sale or sales made in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Trust. The Sponsor may suspend its sales of
the Trust's bitcoin upon the occurrence of unusual or unforeseen circumstances.

 Investment
Objective

 The Trust's investment
objective is to seek to track the performance of bitcoin, as measured by the Index, adjusted for the Trust's expenses and other
liabilities. In seeking to achieve its investment objective, the Trust holds bitcoin and values its Shares daily as of 4:00 p.m. ET based
on the Index.

 Principal
Market and Fair Value Determination of bitcoin

 The NAV of the Trust is used
by the Trust in its day-to-day operations to measure the net value of the Trust's assets. The NAV is calculated on each business
day and is equal to the aggregate value of the Trust's assets less its liabilities based on the Index price. In determining the
NAV of the Trust on any business day, the Administrator will calculate the price of the bitcoin held by the Trust as of 4:00 p.m. ET on
such day. The Administrator will also calculate the "NAV per Share" of the Trust, which equals the NAV of the Trust divided
by the number of outstanding Shares. For purposes of making these calculations, a business day means any day other than a day when the
Exchange is closed for regular trading.

 In addition to calculating
NAV and NAV per Share, for purposes of the Trust's financial statements, the Trust determines the Principal Market NAV and Principal
Market NAV per Share on each valuation date for such financial statements. The determination of the Principal Market NAV and Principal
Market NAV per Share is identical to the calculation of NAV and NAV per Share, respectively, except that the value of bitcoin is determined
using the fair value of bitcoin based on the price in the bitcoin market that the Trust considers its "principal market" as
of 4:00 p.m. ET on the valuation date, rather than using the Index.

 NAV and NAV per Share are
not measures calculated in accordance with GAAP and are not intended as substitute for Principal Market and Principal Market NAV per Share,
respectively.

 The Trust follows the provisions
of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements ("ASC 820"). ASC 820 provides guidance for determining fair value and requires increased
disclosure regarding the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. ASC 820 determines fair value to be the price that
would be received for bitcoin in a current sale, which assumes an exit price resulting from an orderly transaction between market participants
on the measurement date. ASC 820-10 requires the assumption that bitcoin is sold in its principal market to market participants (or in
the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market).

 The cost basis of the investment
in bitcoin recorded by the Trust for financial reporting purposes is the fair value of bitcoin at the time of transfer. The cost basis
recorded by the Trust may differ from proceeds collected by the Authorized Participant from the sale of the corresponding Shares to investors.

 Fees,
Expenses and Realized Gain (Loss)

 The Trust pays the unitary
Sponsor Fee of 0.21% of the Trust's bitcoin holdings. The Sponsor Fee is paid by the Trust to the Sponsor as compensation for services
performed under the Trust Agreement. The Sponsor is waiving the entire Sponsor Fee for (i) a six-month period which commenced on January
11, 2024 (the day the Trust's Shares were initially listed on the Exchange), or (ii) the first $1 billion of Trust assets, whichever
comes first.

 Except for during periods
during which the Sponsor Fee is being waived, the Sponsor Fee accrues daily and is payable in bitcoin weekly in arrears. The Administrator
calculates the Sponsor Fee on a daily basis by applying a 0.21% annualized rate to the Trust's total bitcoin holdings, and the amount
of bitcoin payable in respect of each daily accrual is determined by reference to the Index. The Sponsor has agreed to pay all operating
expenses (except for litigation expenses and other extraordinary expenses) out of the Sponsor Fee.

 As partial consideration for
receipt of the Sponsor Fee, the Sponsor assumes and pays all fees and other expenses incurred by the Trust in the ordinary course of its
affairs, excluding taxes, but including (i) fees to the Sub-Adviser; (ii) the Marketing Fee, (iii) fees to the Administrator, if any,
(iv) fees to the Bitcoin Custodian, (v) fees to the Transfer Agent, (vi) fees to the Trustee, (vii) the fees and expenses related to any
future listing, trading or quotation of the Shares on any listing exchange or quotation system (including legal, marketing and audit fees
and expenses), (viii) ordinary course legal fees and expenses but not litigation-related expenses, (ix) audit fees, (x) regulatory fees,
including if applicable any fees relating to the registration of the Shares under the Securities Act or Exchange Act, (xi) printing and
mailing costs; (xii) costs of maintaining the Trust's website and (xiii) applicable license fees (each, a "Sponsor-paid Expense"
and together, the "Sponsor-paid Expenses"), provided that any expense that qualifies as an Additional Trust Expense will be
deemed to be an Additional Trust Expense and not a Sponsor-paid Expense.

 The Sponsor does not, however,
assume certain extraordinary, non-recurring expenses that are not Sponsor-paid Expenses, including, but not limited to, taxes and governmental
charges, expenses and costs of any extraordinary services performed by the Sponsor (or any other service provider) on behalf of the Trust
to protect the Trust or the interests of Shareholders, any indemnification of the Bitcoin Custodian, Administrator or other agents, service
providers or counterparties of the Trust, the fees and expenses related to the listing, and extraordinary legal fees and expenses, including
any legal fees and expenses incurred in connection with litigation, regulatory enforcement or investigation matters (collectively, "Additional
Trust Expenses"). Of the Sponsor-paid Expenses, ordinary course legal fees and expenses are subject to a cap of not more than $100,000
per annum. In the Sponsor's sole discretion, all or any portion of a Sponsor-paid Expense may be redesignated as an Additional Trust
Expense.

 After the payment of the Sponsor
Fee to the Sponsor, the Sponsor may elect to convert some or all of the Sponsor Fee into cash by selling this bitcoin at market prices,
in the Sponsor's sole discretion. Due to the variance in market prices for bitcoin, the rate at which the Sponsor converts bitcoin
to cash may differ from the rate at which the Sponsor Fee was initially paid in bitcoin.

 The Bitcoin Custodian assumes
the transfer fees associated with the transfer of bitcoin to the Sponsor with respect to the Sponsor Fee, and any further expenses associated
with such transfer are assumed by the Sponsor. The Trust is not responsible for any fees and expenses incurred by the Sponsor to convert
bitcoin received in payment of the Sponsor Fee into cash.

 Pursuant to the Trust Agreement,
the Sponsor or its delegates directs the Bitcoin Custodian to transfer bitcoin from the Trust's Cold Vault Balance as needed to
pay the Sponsor's Fee and Additional Trust Expenses, if any. The Sponsor or its delegates endeavors to transfer the smallest amount
of bitcoin needed to pay applicable expenses. The Sponsor, in arranging for payment of Additional Trust Expenses, may in its discretion
direct that the Trust's bitcoin be exchanged for U.S. Dollars. Under such circumstances, the Trust will not utilize the Bitcoin
Custodian to arrange for the sale of the Trust's bitcoin to pay the Trust's expenses and liabilities. Rather, the Sponsor
will arrange for the Prime Broker, an affiliate of the Bitcoin Custodian, or another third-party digital asset trading platform to exchange
the Trust's bitcoin for U.S. dollars in such a situation.

 Creation
and Redemption of Shares

 The Trust creates and redeems
Shares from time to time, but only in one or more Baskets (other than in the case of the Seed Creation Baskets) consisting of 5,000 Shares
or multiples thereof. Baskets are only made in exchange for delivery to the Trust or the distribution by the Trust of the amount of cash
equivalent to the amount of bitcoin represented by the Baskets being created or redeemed, the amount of which is based on the quantity
of bitcoin attributable to each Share of the Trust (net of accrued but unpaid Sponsor Fees and any accrued but unpaid extraordinary expenses
or liabilities) being created or redeemed determined as of 4:00 p.m. ET on the day the order to create or redeem Baskets is properly received.

 Authorized Participants are
the only persons that may place orders to create and redeem Baskets. Authorized Participants must be (1) registered broker-dealers or
other securities market participants, such as banks and other financial institutions, which are not required to register as broker-dealers
to engage in securities transactions described below, and (2) DTC Participants. To become an Authorized Participant, a person must enter
into an Authorized Participant Agreement with the Sponsor. The Authorized Participant Agreement provides the procedures for the creation
and redemption of Baskets and for the delivery of the bitcoin required for such creation and redemptions. The Authorized Participant Agreement
and the related procedures attached thereto may be amended by the Trust, without the consent of any Shareholder or Authorized Participant.
Authorized Participants pay the Transfer Agent a fee for each order they place to create or redeem one or more Baskets. The transaction
fee may be reduced, increased, or otherwise changed by the Sponsor.

 Authorized Participants will
deliver only cash to create shares and will receive only cash when redeeming Shares. Further, Authorized Participants will not directly
or indirectly purchase, hold, deliver, or receive bitcoin as part of the creation or redemption process or otherwise direct the Trust
or a Bitcoin Counterparty with respect to purchasing, holding, delivering, or receiving bitcoin as part of the creation or redemption
process.

 The Trust creates Shares by
receiving bitcoin from a Bitcoin Counterparty that is not the Authorized Participant, and the Trust—not the Authorized Participant—is
responsible for selecting the Bitcoin Counterparty to deliver the bitcoin. Further, the Bitcoin Counterparty does not act as an agent
of the Authorized Participant with respect to the delivery of the bitcoin to the Trust or act at the direction of the Authorized Participant
with respect to the delivery of the bitcoin to the Trust.

 The Trust redeems Shares by
delivering bitcoin to a Bitcoin Counterparty that is not the Authorized Participant and the Trust—not the Authorized Participant
—is responsible for selecting the Bitcoin Counterparty to receive the bitcoin. Further, the Bitcoin Counterparty does not act as
an agent of the Authorized Participant with respect to the receipt of the bitcoin from the Trust or act at the direction of the Authorized
Participant with respect to the receipt of the bitcoin from the Trust.

 Bitcoin Counterparties deliver
bitcoin related to the Authorized Participant's purchase order to the Trust's Cold Balance Vault Account. Authorized Participants
and Bitcoin Counterparties are not required to maintain an account with the Bitcoin Custodian.

 Creations and redemptions
of Shares may result in certain slippage being incurred as a result of, for example, trading fees, spreads, or commissions. Any slippage
so incurred will be the responsibility of the Authorized Participant, as a cash liability, and not of the Trust or Sponsor.

 Each Authorized Participant
is required to be registered as a broker-dealer under the Exchange Act and a member in good standing with FINRA or exempt from being or
otherwise not required to be licensed as a broker-dealer or a member of FINRA and be qualified to act as a broker or dealer in the states
or other jurisdictions where the nature of its business so requires. Certain Authorized Participants may also be regulated under federal
and state banking laws and regulations. Each Authorized Participant has its own set of rules and procedures, internal controls, and information
barriers as it determines is appropriate considering its own regulatory regime.

 Service
Providers of the Trust

 The
sponsor

 The Sponsor arranged for the
creation of the Trust and is responsible for the ongoing registration of the Shares for their public offering in the United States and
the listing of Shares on the Exchange. The Sponsor does not exercise day-to-day oversight over the Trustee, the Bitcoin Custodian, or
the Index Provider. The Sponsor develops a marketing plan for the Trust, prepares marketing materials regarding the Shares of the Trust,
and exercises the marketing plan of the Trust on an ongoing basis. The Sponsor engaged the Sub-Adviser pursuant to the Support Services
Agreement to serve as the Trust's sub-adviser and provide marketing support to the Sponsor with respect to the Trust. The Sponsor
is responsible for supervising the Sub-Adviser. The Sponsor agreed to pay all operating expenses (except for litigation expenses and other
extraordinary expenses) out of the Sponsor's unified fee.

 The Sponsor is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Amun Holdings Ltd. At present, the primary business activities of Amun Holdings Ltd. are providing exchange traded products
and tokenization services in the crypto space through its subsidiaries.

 21Shares AG, an affiliate
of the Sponsor, has considerable experience issuing and operating exchange-traded products that provide exposure to digital assets, operating
such exchange-traded products since 2018. As of December 31, 2023, 21Shares AG oversees approximately $2.4 billion in assets under management
and nearly 40 digital asset-related exchange-traded products across various jurisdictions. Although the Sponsor is a relatively new entity
within the broader structure of 21Shares AG and its affiliates (collectively, the "21Shares Group"), the Sponsor utilizes
a similar management team that the 21Shares Group has used in issuing and operating these exchange-traded products. Additionally, as of
December 31, 2023, the Sponsor serves as sub-adviser to five investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940
Act, as amended.

 The Sponsor is not under any
liability to the Trust, the Trustee or any Shareholder for any action taken or for refraining from the taking of any action in good faith
pursuant to the Trust Agreement, or for errors in judgment or for depreciation or loss incurred by reason of the sale of any bitcoin or
other assets held in trust hereunder; provided, however, that this provision will not protect the Sponsor against any liability to which
it would otherwise be subject by reason of its own gross negligence, bad faith, or wilful misconduct. The Sponsor may rely in good faith
on any paper, order, notice, list, affidavit, receipt, evaluation, opinion, endorsement, assignment, draft, or any other document of any
kind prima facie properly executed and submitted to it by the Trustee, the Trustee's counsel or by any other Person for any matters
arising hereunder. The Sponsor will in no event be deemed to have assumed or incurred any liability, duty, or obligation to any Shareholder
or to the Trustee other than as expressly provided for herein. The Trust will not incur the cost of that portion of any insurance which
insures any party against any liability, the indemnification of which is herein prohibited.

 The Sponsor and its shareholders,
members, directors, officers, employees, affiliates and subsidiaries (each a "Sponsor Indemnified Party") are indemnified
by the Trust against any losses, judgments, liabilities, expenses and amounts paid in settlement of any claims arising out of or in connection
with the performance of its obligations under the Trust Agreement or any actions taken in accordance with the provisions of the Trust
Agreement, provided that (i) the Sponsor was acting on behalf of, or performing services for, the Trust and has determined, in good faith,
that such course of conduct was in the best interests of the Trust and such liability or loss was not the result of fraud, gross negligence,
bad faith, wilful misconduct, or a material breach of this Trust Agreement on the part of the Sponsor and (ii) any such indemnification
will be recoverable only from the Trust Estate. Any amounts payable to a Sponsor Indemnified Party under the Trust Agreement may be payable
in advance or will be secured by a lien on the Trust. The Sponsor will not be under any obligation to appear in, prosecute or defend any
legal action that in its opinion may involve it in any expense or liability; provided, however, that the Sponsor may, in its discretion,
undertake any action that it may deem necessary or desirable in respect of the Trust Agreement and the rights and duties of the parties
hereto and the interests of the Shareholders and, in such event, the legal expenses and costs of any such action will be expenses and
costs of the Trust and the Sponsor will be entitled to be reimbursed therefor by the Trust. The obligations of the Trust to indemnify
the Sponsor Indemnified Parties will survive the termination of the Trust Agreement.

 The
sub-adviser

 The Sub-Adviser, ARK Investment
Management LLC, serves as the Trust's sub-adviser. The Sub-Adviser provides data, research, and, as needed, operational support
to the Trust. As of December 31, 2023, the Sub-Adviser had approximately $29.36 billion in assets under management. The Trust is passively
managed and does not pursue active management investment strategies, and the Sponsor and the Sub-Adviser do not actively manage the bitcoin
held by the Trust. This means that the Sponsor and the Sub-Adviser do not sell bitcoin at times when its price is high or acquire bitcoin
at low prices in the expectation of future price increases. It also means that the Sponsor and the Sub-Adviser do not make use of any
of the hedging techniques available to professional bitcoin investors to attempt to reduce the risks of losses resulting from price decreases.
The Sponsor entered into the Support Services Agreement with the Sub-Adviser and pays the Sub-Adviser out of the unitary fee it receives
from the Trust.

 The Trust does not directly
pay the Sub-Adviser.

 the
trustee

 Delaware Trust Company, a
Delaware trust company, acts as the trustee of the Trust for the purpose of creating a Delaware statutory trust in accordance with the
DSTA. The Trustee is appointed to serve as the trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware for the sole purpose of satisfying the requirement
of Section 3807(a) of the DSTA that the Trust have at least one trustee with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware.

 As further discussed in the
Trust Agreement, the Trustee is not liable for the acts or omissions of the Sponsor, nor is the Trustee liable for supervising or monitoring
the performance and the duties and obligations of the Sponsor or the Trust under the Trust Agreement. The Trustee is not personally liable
under any circumstances, except for its own wilful misconduct, bad faith, or gross negligence.

 The Trustee or any officer,
affiliate, director, employee, or agent of the Trustee (each, an "Indemnified Person") is entitled to indemnification from
the Sponsor or the Trust, to the fullest extent permitted by law, from and against any and all losses, claims, taxes, damages, reasonable
expenses, and liabilities (including liabilities under State or federal securities laws) of any kind and nature whatsoever (collectively,
"Expenses"), to the extent that such Expenses arise out of or are imposed upon or asserted against such Indemnified Persons
with respect to the creation, operation or termination of the Trust, the execution, delivery or performance of the Trust Agreement or
the transactions contemplated in the Trust Agreement; provided, however, that the Sponsor and the Trust are not required to indemnify
any Indemnified Person for any Expenses that are a result of the wilful misconduct, bad faith or gross negligence of such Indemnified
Person.

 the
administrator

 The Sponsor entered into a
Fund Administration and Accounting Agreement with BNY Mellon Asset Servicing, a division of The Bank of New York Mellon, to provide administration
and accounting services to the Trust. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and under the supervision and direction of the Sponsor and
the Trust, BNY Mellon Asset Servicing keeps the operational records of the Trust and prepares and files certain regulatory filings on
behalf of the Trust. BNY Mellon Asset Servicing may also perform other services for the Trust pursuant to the Agreement as mutually agreed
upon by the Sponsor, the Trust and BNY Mellon Asset Servicing from time to time. The Administrator's fees are paid on behalf of
the Trust by the Sponsor.

 THE
Transfer AGENT

 The
Bank of New York Mellon serves as the Transfer Agent of the Trust pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Transfer Agency and Service
Agreement (the "Transfer Agency and Service Agreement "). The
Transfer Agent: (1) facilitates the issuance and redemption of Shares of the Trust; (2) responds to correspondence by Trust shareholders
and others relating to its duties; (3) maintains shareholder accounts; and (4) makes periodic reports to the Trust.

 the
bitcoin custodian

 Coinbase Custody Trust Company,
LLC is the bitcoin custodian for the Trust and holds all the Trust's bitcoin on the Trust's behalf.

 The Bitcoin Custodian keeps
custody of all the Trust's bitcoin, other than which is maintained in the Trading Balance with the Prime Broker, in the Vault Balance.
The Bitcoin Custodian keeps a substantial portion of the private keys associated with the Trust's bitcoin in "cold storage"
or similarly secure technology. Cold storage is a safeguarding method with multiple layers of protections and protocols, by which the
private key(s) corresponding to the Trust's bitcoin is (are) generated and stored in an offline manner. Private keys are generated
in offline computers that are not connected to the internet so that they are resistant to being hacked. By contrast, in hot storage, the
private keys are held online, where they are more accessible, leading to more efficient transfers, though they are potentially more vulnerable
to being hacked. While the Bitcoin Custodian will generally keep a substantial portion of the Trust's bitcoin in cold storage on
an ongoing basis, it is possible that, from time to time, portions of the Trust's bitcoin will be held outside of cold storage temporarily
in the Trading Balance maintained by the Prime Broker as part of trade facilitation in connection with creations and redemptions of Baskets,
to sell bitcoin including to pay Trust expenses, or to pay the Sponsor Fee, as necessary. The Trust's bitcoin held in the Cold Vault
Balance by the Bitcoin Custodian are held in segregated wallets and therefore are not commingled with the Bitcoin Custodian's or
other customer assets.

 Cold storage of private keys
may involve keeping such keys on a non-networked computer or electronic device or storing the public key and private keys on a storage
device or printed medium and deleting the keys from all computers. The Bitcoin Custodian may receive deposits of bitcoin but may not send
bitcoin without use of the corresponding private keys. To send bitcoin when the private keys are kept in cold storage, unsigned transactions
must be physically transferred to the offline cold storage facility and signed using a software/hardware utility with the corresponding
offline keys. At that point, the Bitcoin Custodian can upload the fully signed transaction to an online network and transfer the bitcoin.
Such private keys are stored in cold storage facilities within the United States and Europe, exact locations of which are not disclosed
for security reasons. A limited number of employees at the Bitcoin Custodian are involved in private key management operations, and the
Bitcoin Custodian has represented that no single individual has access to full private keys.

 The Bitcoin Custodian's
internal audit team performs periodic internal audits over custody operations, and the Bitcoin Custodian has represented that Systems
and Organizational Control ("SOC") attestations covering private key management controls are also performed on the Bitcoin
Custodian by an external provider.

 The Bitcoin Custodian maintains
a commercial crime insurance policy, which is intended to cover the loss of client assets held in cold storage, including from employee
collusion or fraud, physical loss including theft, damage of key material, security breach or hack, and fraudulent transfer. The insurance
maintained by the Bitcoin Custodian is shared among all the Bitcoin Custodian's customers, is not specific to the Trust or to customers
holding bitcoin with the Bitcoin Custodian and may not be available or sufficient to protect the Trust from all possible losses or sources
of losses.

 Bitcoin held in the Trust's
account with the Bitcoin Custodian is the property of the Trust. The Trust, the Sponsor and the service providers will not loan or pledge
the Trust's assets nor will the Trust's assets serve as collateral for any loan or similar arrangement. The Trust will not
utilize leverage, derivatives, or any similar arrangements in seeking to meet its investment objective.

 In the event of a fork, the
Custodial Services Agreement provides that the Bitcoin Custodian may temporarily suspend services, and may, in their sole discretion,
determine whether or not to support (or cease supporting) either branch of the forked protocol entirely, provided that the Bitcoin Custodian
shall use commercially reasonable efforts to avoid ceasing to support both branches of such forked protocol and will support, at a minimum,
the original digital asset. The Custodial Services Agreement provides that, other than as set forth therein, and provided that the Bitcoin
Custodian shall make commercially reasonable efforts to assist the Trust to retrieve and/or obtain any assets related to a fork, airdrop
or similar event the Bitcoin Custodian shall have no liability, obligation or responsibility whatsoever arising out of or relating to
the operation of the underlying software protocols relating to the Bitcoin network or an unsupported branch of a forked protocol and,
accordingly, Client acknowledges and assumes the risk of the same. The Custodian Agreement further provides that, unless specifically
communicated by the Bitcoin Custodian and its affiliates through a written public statement on the Coinbase website, the Bitcoin Custodian
does not support airdrops, metacoins, colored coins, side chains, or other derivative, enhanced or forked protocols, tokens or coins,
which supplement or interact with bitcoin.

 Under the Trust Agreement,
the Sponsor has the right, in its sole discretion, to determine what action to take in connection with the Trust's entitlement to
or ownership of Incidental Rights or any IR Virtual Currency, and Trust may take any lawful action necessary or desirable in connection
with the Trust's ownership of Incidental Rights, including the acquisition of IR Virtual Currency, as determined by the Sponsor
in the Sponsor's sole discretion, unless such action would adversely affect the status of the Trust as a grantor trust for U.S.
federal income tax purposes or otherwise be prohibited by this Trust Agreement.

 With respect to any fork,
airdrop or similar event, the Sponsor will cause the Trust to irrevocably abandon the Incidental Rights or IR Virtual Currency. In the
event the Trust seeks to change this position, an application would need to be filed with the SEC by the Exchange seeking approval to
amend its listing rules.

 Under the Custodial Services
Agreement, the Bitcoin Custodian's liability is limited as follows, among others: (i) other than with respect to claims and losses
arising from spot trading of bitcoin, or fraud or wilful misconduct, among others, the Bitcoin Custodian's aggregate liability under
the Custodial Services Agreement shall not exceed the greater of (A) the greater of (x) $5 million and (y) the aggregate fees paid by
the Trust to the Bitcoin Custodian in the 12 months prior to the event giving rise to the Bitcoin Custodian's liability, and (B)
the value of the affected bitcoin or cash giving rise to the Bitcoin Custodian's liability; (ii) the Bitcoin Custodian's aggregate
liability in respect of each cold storage address shall not exceed $100 million; (iii) in respect of the Bitcoin Custodian's obligations
to indemnify the Trust and its affiliates against third party claims and losses to the extent arising out of or relating to, among others,
the Bitcoin Custodian's violation of any law, rule or regulation with respect to the provision of its services, the Bitcoin Custodian's
liability shall not exceed the greater of (A) $5 million and (B) the aggregate fees paid by the Trust to the Bitcoin Custodian in the
12 months prior to the event giving rise to the Bitcoin Custodian's liability; and (iv) in respect of any incidental, indirect,
special, punitive, consequential or similar losses, the Bitcoin Custodian is not liable, even if the Bitcoin Custodian has been advised
of or knew or should have known of the possibility thereof. The Bitcoin Custodian is not liable for delays, suspension of operations,
failure in performance, or interruption of service to the extent it is directly due to a cause or condition beyond the reasonable control
of the Bitcoin Custodian. Under the Custodial Services Agreement, except in the case of its negligence, fraud, material violation of applicable
law or wilful misconduct, the Bitcoin Custodian shall not have any liability, obligation, or responsibility for any damage or interruptions
caused by any computer viruses, spyware, scareware, Trojan horses, worms or other malware that may affect the Trust's computer or
other equipment, or any phishing, spoofing or other attack, unless the Bitcoin Custodian fails to have commercially reasonable policies,
procedures and technical controls in place to prevent such damages or interruptions.

 The Bitcoin Custodian may
terminate the Custodial Services Agreement for any reason upon providing the applicable notice to the Trust, or immediately for Cause
(as defined in the Custodial Services Agreement), including, among others, if the Trust materially breaches the Prime Broker Agreement
and such breach remains uncured, or undergoes a bankruptcy event.

 The Sponsor may, in its sole
discretion, add or terminate custodians at any time. The Sponsor may, in its sole discretion, change the custodian for the Trust's
bitcoin holdings, but it will have no obligation whatsoever to do so or to seek any terms for the Trust from other such custodians.

 the
prime broker

 Pursuant to the Prime Broker
Agreement, a portion of the Trust's bitcoin holdings and cash holdings from time to time may be held with the Prime Broker, an affiliate
of the Bitcoin Custodian, in the Trading Balance, in connection with the creation and redemption of Shares via cash transactions or to
pay for Trust Expenses not assumed by the Sponsor in consideration for the Sponsor Fee. The amount of bitcoin that may be held in the
Trading Balance will be limited to the amount necessary to process a given creation or redemption transaction, as applicable, or to pay
for Trust Expenses not assumed by the Sponsor in consideration for the Sponsor Fee.

 The Sponsor may, in its sole
discretion, add or terminate prime brokers at any time. The Sponsor may, in its sole discretion, change the prime broker for the Trust,
but it will have no obligation whatsoever to do so or to seek any terms for the Trust from other such prime brokers.

 These periodic holdings held
in the Trading Balance with the Prime Broker represent an omnibus claim on the Prime Broker's bitcoin held on behalf of clients;
these holdings exist across a combination of omnibus hot wallets, omnibus cold wallets or in accounts in the Prime Broker's name
on a trading venue (including third-party venues and the Prime Broker's own execution venue) where the Prime Broker executes orders
to buy and sell bitcoin on behalf of clients (each such venue, a "Connected Trading Venue"). The Prime Broker is not required
to hold any of the bitcoin in the Trust's Trading Balance in cold storage or to hold any such bitcoin in segregation, and neither
the Trust nor the Sponsor can control the method by which the Prime Broker holds the bitcoin credited to the Trust's Trading Balance.
Within the Trust's Trading Balance, the Prime Broker Agreement provides that the Trust does not have an identifiable claim to any
particular bitcoin (and cash). Instead, the Trust's Trading Balance represents an entitlement to a pro rata share of the bitcoin
(and cash) the Prime Broker holds on to behalf of customers who hold similar entitlements against the Prime Broker. In this way, the Trust's
Trading Balance represents an omnibus claim on the Prime Broker's bitcoin (and cash) held on behalf of the Prime Broker's
customers.

 Within such omnibus hot and
cold wallets and accounts, the Prime Broker has represented to the Sponsor that it keeps the majority of assets in cold wallets, to promote
security, while the balance of assets is kept in hot wallets to facilitate rapid withdrawals. However, the Sponsor has no control over,
and for security reasons the Prime Broker does not disclose to the Sponsor, the percentage of bitcoin that the Prime Broker holds for
customers holding similar entitlements as the Trust which are kept in omnibus cold wallets, as compared to omnibus hot wallets or omnibus
accounts in the Prime Broker's name on a trading venue. The Prime Broker has represented to the Sponsor that the percentage of assets
maintained in cold versus hot storage is determined by ongoing risk analysis and market dynamics, in which the Prime Broker attempts to
balance anticipated liquidity needs for its customers as a class against the anticipated greater security of cold storage.

 The Prime Broker is not required
by the Prime Broker Agreement to hold any of the bitcoin in the Trust's Trading Balance in cold storage or to hold any such bitcoin
in segregation, and neither the Trust nor the Sponsor can control the method by which the Prime Broker holds the bitcoin credited to the
Trust's Trading Balance.

 To the extent the Trust sells
bitcoin through the Prime Broker, the Trust's orders will be executed at Connected Trading Venues that have been approved in accordance
with the Prime Broker's due diligence and risk assessment process. The Prime Broker has represented that its due diligence on Connected
Trading Venues include reviews conducted by the legal, compliance, security, privacy and finance and credit-risk teams. The Connected
Trading Venues, which are subject to change from time to time, currently include Bitstamp, LMAX, Kraken, the exchange operated by the
Prime Broker, as well as four additional non-bank market makers ("NBMMs"). The Prime Broker has represented to the Trust that
it is unable to name the NBMMs due to confidentiality restriction.

 Pursuant to the Prime Broker Agreement, the Trust may engage in purchases
or sales of bitcoin by placing orders with the Prime Broker. The Prime Broker will route orders placed by the Sponsor through the Prime
Broker's execution platform (the "Trading Platform") to a Connected Trading Venue where the order will be executed.
Each order placed by the Sponsor will be sent, processed, and settled at each Connected Trading Venue to which it is routed. The Prime
Broker Agreement provides that the Prime Broker is subject to certain conflicts of interest, including: (i) the Trust's orders may
be routed to the Prime Broker's own execution venue where the Trust's orders may be executed against other customers of the
Prime Broker or with the Coinbase acting as principal, (ii) the beneficial identity of the counterparty purchaser or seller with respect
to the Trust's orders may be unknown and therefore may inadvertently be another client of the Prime Broker, (iii) the Prime Broker
does not engage in front-running, but is aware of the Trust's orders or imminent orders and may execute a trade for its own inventory
(or the account of an affiliate) while in possession of that knowledge and (iv) the Prime Broker may act in a principal capacity with
respect to certain orders. As a result of these and other conflicts, when acting as principal, the Prime Broker may have an incentive
to favor its own interests and the interests of its affiliates over the Trust's interests.

 Subject to the foregoing,
and to certain policies and procedures that the Prime Broker Agreement requires the Prime Broker to have in place to mitigate conflicts
of interest when executing the Trust's orders, the Prime Broker Agreement provides that the Prime Broker shall have no liability,
obligation, or responsibility whatsoever for the selection or performance of any Connected Trading Venue, and that other Connected Trading
Venues and/or trading venues not used by Coinbase may offer better prices and/or lower costs than the Connected Trading Venue used to
execute the Trust's orders.

 Once the Sponsor, on behalf
of the Trust, places an order to purchase or sell bitcoin on the Trading Platform in connection with the creation or redemption of Shares
via a cash transaction, the associated bitcoin or cash used to fund or fill the order, if any, will be placed on hold and will generally
not be eligible for other use or withdrawal from the Trust's Trading Balance. The Trust's Vault Balance may be used directly
to fund orders. With each Connected Trading Venue, the Prime Broker shall establish an account in the Prime Broker's name, or in
its name for the benefit of clients, to trade on behalf of its clients, including the Trust, and the Trust will not, by virtue of the
Trading Balance the Trust maintains with the Prime Broker, have a direct legal relationship, or account with, any Connected Trading Venue.

 The Prime Broker may terminate
the Prime Broker Agreement in its entirety for any reason and without Cause (as defined below) by providing at least ninety (90) days'
prior written notice to the Trust. The Trust may terminate the Prime Broker Agreement in its entirety for any reason and without Cause
by providing at least 30 (thirty) days' prior written notice to the Prime Broker; provided, however, the Trust's termination
of the Prime Broker Agreement shall not be effective until the Trust has fully satisfied its obligations the Prime Broker Agreement.

 The Prime Broker and the Bitcoin
Custodian may, in their sole discretion, suspend, restrict or terminate the Trust's prime broker services, including by suspending,
restricting or closing any account of the Trust covered under the Prime Broker Agreement for Cause, at any time and with prior notice
to the Trust.

 the
cash custodian

 The
Cash Custodian is The Bank of New York Mellon. The Cash Custodian's services are governed under the Custody Agreement between The
Bank of New York Mellon and the Trust. In performing its duties under the Custody Agreement, BNY Mellon is required to exercise the standard
of care and diligence that a professional custodian for exchange-traded funds would observe in these affairs considering the prevailing
rules, practices, procedures, and circumstances in the relevant market and to perform its duties without negligence, fraud, bad faith,
wilful misconduct, or reckless disregard of its duties under the Custody Agreement. Under the Custody Agreement, BNY Mellon is not liable
for any all losses, damages, costs, charges, expenses, or liabilities (including reasonable counsel fees and expenses) (collectively,
"Losses") except to the extent caused by BNY Mellon's own bad faith, negligence, wilful misconduct, or reckless disregard
of its duties under the Custody Agreement. The Trust will indemnify and hold harmless BNY Mellon from and against all Losses, incurred
by BNY Mellon arising out of or relating to BNY Mellon's performance under the Custody Agreement, except to the extent resulting
from BNY Mellon's failure to perform its obligations under the Custody Agreement in accordance with the agreement's standard
of care. The Sponsor may, in its sole discretion, add or terminate cash custodians at any time.

 the
marketing agent

 Foreside Global Services,
LLC (the "Marketing Agent") is responsible for reviewing and approving the marketing materials prepared by the Sponsor for
compliance with applicable SEC and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") advertising laws, rules, and regulations.

 authorized
participants

 Creation Units are created
or redeemed only by Authorized Participants. Each Authorized Participant must be a registered broker-dealer, a participant in DTC, and
have entered into an agreement with the Sponsor and Administrator (the "Authorized Participant Agreement"). The Authorized
Participant Agreement provides the procedures for the creation and redemption of Creation Units and for the delivery of cash in connection
with such creations or redemptions. Additional Authorized Participants may be added at any time, subject to the discretion of the Sponsor.

 Taxation
of the trust

 The Sponsor intends to take the position that the Trust is properly
treated as a grantor trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Assuming that the Trust is a grantor trust, the Trust will not be subject
to U.S. federal income tax. Rather, if the Trust is a grantor trust, each beneficial owner of Shares is treated as directly owning its
 pro rata share of the Trust's assets and a pro rata portion of the Trust's income, gain, losses and deductions
will "flow through" to each beneficial owner of Shares. If the Trust sells bitcoin (for example, to pay fees or expenses),
such a sale is a taxable event to Shareholders. Upon a Shareholder's sale of its Shares, the Shareholder will be treated as having
sold the pro rata share of the bitcoin held in the Trust at the time of the sale and may recognize gain or loss on such sale.

 Item 1A. Risk Factors

 Summary of Risk Factors

 Below is a summary
of the principal factors that make an investment in the Shares speculative or risky. This summary does not address all the risks that
we face. Additional discussion of the risks summarized in this risk factor summary, and other risks that we face, can be found below,
and should be read in conjunction with the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the Trust's
financial statements and related notes thereto, and our other filings with the SEC, before making an investment decision regarding the
Shares. See "Glossary of Defined Terms" for the definition of certain capitalized terms used in this Annual Report. All other
capitalized terms used, but not defined, herein have the meanings given to them in the Trust Agreement.

 Risks Associated with Bitcoin and the Bitcoin Network

 Digital assets such as bitcoin were only introduced within the past decade, and the medium-to-long term value of the Shares is subject to a number of factors relating to the capabilities and development of blockchain technologies and to the fundamental investment characteristics of digital assets that are uncertain and difficult to evaluate.

 The value of the Shares relates directly to the value of bitcoin, the value of which may be highly volatile and subject to fluctuations due to a number of factors.

 The value of the Shares depends on the development and acceptance of the Bitcoin network. The slowing or stopping of the development or acceptance of the Bitcoin network may adversely affect an investment in the Trust.

 Due to the nature of private keys, bitcoin transactions are irrevocable, and stolen or incorrectly transferred bitcoin may be irretrievable. As a result, any incorrectly executed bitcoin transactions could adversely affect an investment in the Trust.

 Security threats to the Trust's account with the Bitcoin Custodian could result in the halting of Trust operations and a loss of Trust assets or damage to the reputation of the Trust, each of which could result in a reduction in the price of the Shares.

 Potential amendments to the Bitcoin network's protocols and software could, if accepted and authorized by the Bitcoin network community, adversely affect an investment in the Trust.

 A temporary or permanent "fork" of the Bitcoin blockchain could adversely affect an investment in the Trust.

 Blockchain technologies are based on the theoretical conjectures as to the impossibility of solving certain cryptographical puzzles quickly. These premises may be incorrect or may become incorrect due to technological advances and could negatively impact the future usefulness of bitcoin and adversely affect an investment in the Trust.

 The price of bitcoin on the bitcoin market has exhibited periods of extreme volatility, which could have a negative impact on the performance of the Trust. For example, between November 2021 and November 2022, the price of bitcoin fell from an all-time high of $68,789 to $15,460. As of December 31, 2023, the price of bitcoin was $42,288.58. (source: Coinbase).

 Bitcoin exchanges on which bitcoin trades are relatively new and, in some cases, unregulated, and, therefore, may be more exposed to fraud and security breaches than established, regulated exchanges for other financial assets or instruments, which could have a negative impact on the performance of the Trust.

 New competing digital assets may pose a challenge to bitcoin's current market position, resulting in a reduction in demand for bitcoin, which could have a negative impact on the price of bitcoin and may have a negative impact on the performance of the Trust.

 Risks Associated with Investing in the Trust

 The
value of the Shares may be influenced by a variety of factors unrelated to the value of bitcoin.

 The
NAV or Principal Market NAV may not always correspond to the market price of bitcoin and, as a result, Creation Baskets may be created
or redeemed at a value that is different from the market price of the Shares.

 The
inability of Authorized Participants and market makers to hedge their bitcoin exposure may adversely affect the liquidity of Shares and
the value of an investment in the Shares.

 The
Trust is subject to risks due to its concentration of investments in a single asset.

 Possible
illiquid markets may exacerbate losses or increase the variability between the Trust's NAV or the Principal Market NAV and its
market price.

 The
 amount of bitcoin represented by the Shares will decline over tim e.

 The
Administrator is solely responsible for determining the value of the bitcoin holdings and bitcoin holdings per Share, and any errors,
discontinuance or changes in such valuation calculations may have an adverse effect on the value of the Shares.

 Risks Associated with the Regulatory Environment
of Bitcoin

 Future and current regulations by a United States or foreign government or quasi-governmental agency could have an adverse effect on an investment in the Trust.

 Shareholders do not have the protections associated with ownership of Shares in an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 ("1940 Act") or the protections afforded by the Commodity Exchange Act (the "CEA").

 Future legal or regulatory developments may negatively affect the value of bitcoin or require the Trust or the Sponsor to become registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") or Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC"), which may cause the Trust to incur unforeseen expenses or liquidate.

 If regulatory changes or interpretations of an Authorized Participant's, the Trust's or the Sponsor's activities require the regulation of an Authorized Participant, the Trust or the Sponsor as a money service business under the regulations promulgated by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network ("FinCEN"), an Authorized Participant, the Trust or the Sponsor may be required to register and comply with such regulations, which could result in extraordinary, recurring and/or nonrecurring expenses.

 Risks Associated with the Tax Treatment of
the Trust and Bitcoin

 Shareholders could incur a tax liability without an associated distribution of the Trust.

 The tax treatment of bitcoin and transactions involving bitcoin for state and local tax purposes is not settled.

 A hard "fork" of the Bitcoin blockchain could result in Shareholders incurring a tax liability.

 Other Risks

 The Exchange on which the Shares are listed may halt trading in the Trust's Shares, which would adversely impact a Shareholder's ability to sell Shares.

 The market infrastructure of the bitcoin spot market could result in the absence of active Authorized Participants able to support the trading activity of the Trust, which would affect the liquidity of the Shares in the secondary market and make it difficult to dispose of Shares.

 Shareholders that are not Authorized Participants may only purchase or sell their Shares in secondary trading markets, and the conditions associated with trading in secondary markets may adversely affect Shareholders' investment in the Shares.

 The Sponsor and Sub-Adviser are leanly staffed and rely heavily on key personnel. The departure of any such key personnel could negatively impact the Trust's operations and adversely impact an investment in the Trust.

 Shareholders do not have the rights enjoyed by investors in certain other vehicles and may be adversely affected by a lack of statutory rights and by limited voting and distribution rights.

 The liability of the Sponsor, Sub-Adviser and the Trustee is limited, and the value of the Shares will be adversely affected if the Trust is required to indemnify the Trustee, the Sponsor or the Sub-Adviser.

 Due to the increased use of technologies, intentional and unintentional cyber-attacks pose operational and information security risks, the occurrence of which can negatively impact an investment in the Trust.

 The following risks,
some of which have occurred and any of which may occur in the future, can have a material adverse effect on our business or financial
performance, which in turn can affect the price of the Shares. These are not the only risks we face. There may be other risks we are not
currently aware of or that we currently deem not to be material but may become material in the future.

 Risks Associated with Bitcoin and the Bitcoin
Network

 Bitcoin is a relatively
new technological innovation with a limited operating history.

 Bitcoin has a relatively limited
history of existence and operations compared to traditional commodities. There is a limited established performance record for the price
of bitcoin and, in turn, a limited basis for evaluating an investment in bitcoin. Although past performance is not necessarily indicative
of future result, if bitcoin had a more established history, such history might (or might not) provide investors with more information
on which to evaluate an investment in the Trust.

 Bitcoin generally.

 The market value of bitcoin
is not related to any specific company, government, or asset. The valuation of bitcoin depends on future expectations for the value of
the Bitcoin network, the number of bitcoin transactions, and the overall usage of bitcoin as an asset. This means that a significant amount
of the value of bitcoin is speculative, which could lead to increased volatility. Investors could experience significant gains, losses
and/or volatility in the Trust's holdings, depending on the valuation of bitcoin.

 Several factors may affect
the price of bitcoin, including, but not limited to, supply and demand, investors' expectations with respect to the rate of inflation,
interest rates, currency exchange rates or future regulatory measures (if any) that restrict the trading of bitcoin or the use of bitcoin
as a form of payment. The issuance of bitcoin is determined by a computer code, not by a central bank, and prices can be extremely volatile.
For instance, during the period from December 17, 2017, to December 14, 2018, bitcoin experienced a decline of roughly 84%,
and experienced a similar decline in value from November 2021 to June 2022. There is no assurance that bitcoin will maintain its long-term
value in terms of purchasing power in the future, or that acceptance of bitcoin payments by mainstream retail merchants and commercial
businesses will continue to grow. The value of the Trust's investments in bitcoin could decline rapidly, including to zero.

 Limits on bitcoin supply.

 Under the source code that
governs the Bitcoin network, the supply of new bitcoin is mathematically controlled so that the number of bitcoin grows at a limited rate
pursuant to a pre-set schedule. The number of bitcoin awarded for solving a new block is automatically halved after every 210,000 blocks
are added to the Bitcoin blockchain, approximately every 4 years. Currently, the fixed reward for solving a new block is 6.25 bitcoin
per block and this is expected to decrease by half to become 3.125 bitcoin in in or around April 2024. This deliberately controlled rate
of bitcoin creation means that the number of bitcoin in existence will increase at a controlled rate until the number of bitcoin in existence
reaches the pre-determined 21 million bitcoin. However, the 21 million supply cap could be changed in a hard fork. It is currently estimated
that the 21 million Bitcoin limitation will be reached in the year 2140.

 The trading prices of
many digital assets, including bitcoin, have experienced extreme volatility in recent periods and may continue to do so. Extreme volatility
in the future, including further declines in the trading prices of bitcoin, could have a material adverse effect on the value of the Shares
and the Shares could lose all or substantially all of their value.

 The trading prices of many
digital assets, including bitcoin, have experienced extreme volatility in recent periods and may continue to do so. For instance, there
were steep increases in the value of certain digital assets, including bitcoin, over the course of 2021, and multiple market observers
asserted that digital assets were experiencing a "bubble." These increases were followed by steep drawdowns throughout 2022
in digital asset trading prices, including for bitcoin. These episodes of rapid price appreciation followed by steep drawdowns have occurred
multiple times throughout bitcoin's history, including in 2011, 2013-2014, and 2017-2018, before repeating again in 2021-2022. Over
the course of 2023 and 2024, bitcoin prices have continued to exhibit extreme volatility.

 Extreme volatility may persist,
and the value of the Shares may significantly decline in the future without recovery. The digital asset markets may still be experiencing
a bubble or may experience a bubble again in the future. For example, in the first half of 2022, each of Celsius Network, Voyager Digital
Ltd., and Three Arrows Capital declared bankruptcy, resulting in a loss of confidence in participants of the digital asset ecosystem and
negative publicity surrounding digital assets more broadly. In November 2022, FTX Trading Ltd. ("FTX"), one of the largest
digital asset exchanges by volume at the time, halted customer withdrawals amid rumours of the company's liquidity issues and likely
insolvency, which were subsequently corroborated by its CEO. Shortly thereafter, FTX's CEO resigned, and FTX and many of its affiliates
filed for bankruptcy in the United States, while other affiliates have entered insolvency, liquidation, or similar proceedings around
the globe, following which the U.S. Department of Justice brought criminal fraud and other charges, and the SEC and CFTC brought civil
securities and commodities fraud charges, against certain of FTX's and its affiliates' senior executives, including its former
CEO, who was found guilty of these criminal charges in November 2023. In addition, several other entities in the digital asset industry
filed for bankruptcy following FTX's bankruptcy filing, such as BlockFi Inc. and Genesis Global Capital, LLC ("Genesis").
In response to these events (collectively, the "2022 Events"), the digital asset markets have experienced extreme price volatility
and other entities in the digital asset industry have been, and may continue to be, negatively affected, further undermining confidence
in the digital asset markets. These events have also negatively impacted the liquidity of the digital asset markets as certain entities
affiliated with FTX engaged in significant trading activity. If the liquidity of the digital asset markets continues to be negatively
impacted by these events, digital asset prices, including bitcoin, may continue to experience significant volatility or price declines,
and confidence in the digital asset markets may be further undermined. In addition, regulatory and enforcement scrutiny has increased,
including from, among others, the U.S. Department of Justice, the SEC, the CFTC, the White House and Congress, as well as state regulators
and authorities. These events are continuing to develop, and the full facts are continuing to emerge. It is not possible to predict at
this time all of the risks that they may pose to the Trust, its service providers or to the digital asset industry as a whole.

 Extreme volatility in the
future, including further declines in the trading prices of bitcoin, could have a material adverse effect on the value of the Shares,
and the Shares could lose all or substantially all of their value. The Trust is not actively managed and will not take any actions to
take advantage, or mitigate the impacts, of volatility in the price of bitcoin.

 Spot markets on which
bitcoin trades are relatively new and largely unregulated.

 Digital asset markets, including
spot markets for bitcoin, are growing rapidly. The spot markets through which bitcoin and other digital assets trade are new and largely
unregulated. These markets are local, national and international and include a broadening range of digital assets and participants. Significant
trading may occur on systems and platforms with minimum predictability. Spot markets may impose daily, weekly, monthly or customer-specific
transaction or withdrawal limits or suspend withdrawals entirely, rendering the exchange of bitcoin for fiat currency difficult or impossible.
Participation in spot markets requires users to take on credit risk by transferring bitcoin from a personal account to a third party's
account.

 Digital asset exchanges do
not appear to be subject to, or may not comply with, regulation in a similar manner as other regulated trading platforms, such as national
securities exchanges or designated contract markets. Many digital asset exchanges are unlicensed, unregulated, operate without extensive
supervision by governmental authorities, and do not provide the public with significant information regarding their ownership structure,
management team, corporate practices, cybersecurity, and regulatory compliance. In particular, those located outside the United States
may be subject to significantly less stringent regulatory and compliance requirements in their local jurisdictions.

 As a result, trading activity
on or reported by these digital asset exchanges is generally significantly less regulated than trading in regulated U.S. securities and
commodities markets and may reflect behaviour that would be prohibited in regulated U.S. trading venues. Furthermore, many spot markets
lack certain safeguards put in place by more traditional exchanges to enhance the stability of trading on the exchange and prevent flash
crashes, such as limit-down circuit breakers. As a result, the prices of digital assets such as bitcoin on digital asset exchanges may
be subject to larger and/or more frequent sudden declines than assets traded on more traditional exchanges. Tools to detect and deter
fraudulent or manipulative trading activities (such as market manipulation, front-running of trades, and wash-trading) may not be available
to or employed by digital asset exchanges or may not exist at all. As a result, the marketplace may lose confidence in, or may experience
problems relating to, these venues.

 No bitcoin exchange is immune
from these risks. While the Trust itself does not buy or sell bitcoin on bitcoin spot markets, the closure or temporary shutdown of bitcoin
exchanges due to fraud, business failure, hackers or malware, or government-mandated regulation may reduce confidence in the Bitcoin network
and can slow down the mass adoption of bitcoin. Further, spot market failures or that of any other major component of the overall bitcoin
ecosystem can have an adverse effect on bitcoin markets and the price of bitcoin and could therefore have a negative impact on the performance
of the Trust.

 Negative perception, a lack
of stability in the bitcoin spot markets, manipulation of bitcoin spot markets by customers and/or the closure or temporary shutdown of
such exchanges due to fraud, business failure, hackers or malware, or government-mandated regulation may reduce confidence in bitcoin
generally and result in greater volatility in the market price of bitcoin and the Shares of the Trust. Furthermore, the closure or temporary
shutdown of a bitcoin spot market may impact the Trust's ability to determine the value of its bitcoin holdings or for the Trust's
Authorized Participants to effectively arbitrage the Trust's Shares.

 The use of cash creations
and redemptions, as opposed to in-kind creations and redemptions, may adversely affect the arbitrage transactions by Authorized Participants
intended to keep the price of the Shares closely linked to the price of bitcoin and, as a result, the price of the Shares may fall or
otherwise diverge from NAV.

 The Trust's inability
to facilitate in-kind creations and redemptions could result in the exchange-traded product arbitrage mechanism failing to function as
efficiently as it otherwise would, leading to the potential for the Shares to trade at premiums or discounts to the NAV per Share, and
such premiums or discounts could be substantial. Furthermore, if cash creations or redemptions are unavailable, either due to the Sponsor's
decision to reject or suspend such orders or otherwise, it will not be possible for Authorized Participants to redeem or create Shares,
in which case the arbitrage mechanism would be unavailable. This could result in impaired liquidity for the Shares, wider bid/ask spreads
in secondary trading of the Shares and greater costs to investors and other market participants. In addition, the Trust's inability
to facilitate in-kind creations and redemptions, and resulting reliance on cash creations and redemptions, could cause the Sponsor to
halt or suspend the creation or redemption of Shares during times of market volatility or turmoil, among other consequences.

 The use of cash creations
and redemptions, as opposed to in-kind creations and redemptions, could cause delays in trade execution due to potential operational issues
arising from implementing a cash creation and redemption model, which involves greater operational steps (and therefore execution risk)
than the originally contemplated in-kind creation and redemption model, or the potential unavailability or exhaustion of the Trade Credits,
which the Trust would not be able to use in connection with in-kind creations and redemptions. Such delays could cause the execution price
associated with such trades to materially deviate from the Index price used to determine the NAV. Even though the Authorized Participant
is responsible for the dollar cost of such difference in prices, Authorized Participants could default on their obligations to the Trust,
or such potential risks and costs could lead to Authorized Participants, who would otherwise be willing to purchase or redeem Baskets
to take advantage of any arbitrage opportunity arising from discrepancies between the price of the Shares and the price of the underlying
bitcoin, to elect to not participate in the Trust's Share creation and redemption processes. This may adversely affect the arbitrage
mechanism intended to keep the price of the Shares closely linked to the price of bitcoin, and as a result, the price of the Shares may
fall or otherwise diverge from NAV. If the arbitrage mechanism is not effective, purchases or sales of Shares on the secondary market
could occur at a premium or discount to NAV, which could harm Shareholders by causing them buy Shares at a price higher than the value
of the underlying bitcoin held by the Trust or sell Shares at a price lower than the value of the underlying bitcoin held by the Trust,
causing Shareholders to suffer losses.

 To the knowledge of the Sponsor,
exchange-traded products for spot-market commodities other than bitcoin, such as gold and silver, generally employ in-kind creations and
redemptions with the underlying asset. The Sponsor believes that it is generally more efficient, and therefore less costly, for spot commodity
exchange-traded products to utilize in-kind orders rather than cash orders, because there are fewer steps in the process and therefore
there is less operational risk involved when an authorized participant can manage the buying and selling of the underlying asset itself,
rather than depend on an unaffiliated party such as the issuer or sponsor of the exchange-traded product. As such, a spot commodity exchange-traded
product that only employs cash creations and redemptions and does not permit in-kind creations and redemptions is a novel product that
has not been tested, and could be impacted by any resulting operational inefficiencies.

 If the process of creation
and redemption of Baskets encounters any unanticipated difficulties, the possibility for arbitrage transactions by Authorized Participants
intended to keep the price of the Shares closely linked to the price of bitcoin may not exist and, as a result, the price of the Shares
may fall or otherwise diverge from NAV.

 If the processes of creation
and redemption of Shares (which depend on timely transfers of bitcoin to and by the Bitcoin Custodian) encounter any unanticipated difficulties
due to, for example, the price volatility of bitcoin, the insolvency, business failure or interruption, default, failure to perform, security
breach, or other problems affecting the Bitcoin Custodian, any operational issues that may arise from creating and redeeming Shares via
cash transactions, the closing of bitcoin trading platforms due to fraud, failures, security breaches or otherwise, or network outages
or congestion, spikes in transaction fees demanded by miners, or other problems or disruptions affecting the Bitcoin network, then potential
market participants, such as the Authorized Participants and their customers, who would otherwise be willing to purchase or redeem Baskets
to take advantage of any arbitrage opportunity arising from discrepancies between the price of the Shares and the price of the underlying
bitcoin may not take the risk that, as a result of those difficulties, they may not be able to realize the profit they expect. In certain
such cases, the Sponsor may suspend the process of creation and redemption of Baskets. During such times, trading spreads, and the resulting
premium or discount, on Shares may widen. Alternatively, in the case of a network outage or other problems affecting the Bitcoin network,
the processing of transactions on the Bitcoin network may be disrupted, which in turn could affect the creation or redemption of Baskets.
If this is the case, the liquidity of the Shares may decline and the price of the Shares may fluctuate independently of the price of bitcoin
and may fall or otherwise diverge from NAV. Furthermore, in the event that the market for bitcoin should become relatively illiquid and
thereby materially restrict opportunities for arbitraging by delivering bitcoin in return for Baskets, the price of Shares may diverge
from the value of bitcoin.

 Authorized Participants
may act in the same or similar capacity for other competing products.

 Authorized participants play
a critical role in supporting the U.S. spot bitcoin exchange-traded product ecosystem. Currently, the number of potential Authorized Participants
willing and capable of serving as Authorized Participants to the Trust or other competing products is limited. Authorized Participants
may act in the same or similar capacity for other competing products, including exchange-traded products offering exposure to the spot
bitcoin market or other digital assets. The Trust is therefore subject to risks associated with these competing products utilizing the
same Authorized Participants to support the trading activity of the Trust and liquidity in the Trust's Shares.

 To the extent Authorized Participants
exit the business or otherwise become unable to process creation and/or redemption orders and no other Authorized Participants step forward
to perform these services, Shares may trade at a material discount to NAV and possibly face delisting. To the extent that exchange-traded
products offering exposure to the spot bitcoin market or other digital assets utilize substantially the same Authorized Participants,
this industry concentration may have the effect of magnifying the risks associated with the Authorized Participants, as operational disruptions
or adverse developments impacting the Authorized Participants may be felt on an industry-wide basis, which, in turn, may adversely affect
not only the Trust and the value of an investment in the Shares, but also these competing products utilizing the same Authorized Participants
and, more generally, exchange-traded products offering exposure to the spot bitcoin market or other digital assets. These industry-wide
adverse effects could result in a broader loss of confidence in exchange-traded products offering exposure to the spot bitcoin market
or other digital assets, which could further impact the Trust and the value of an investment in the Shares.

 Spot markets may be
exposed to security breaches.

 The nature of the assets held
at bitcoin spot markets makes them appealing targets for hackers and a number of bitcoin spot markets have been victims of cybercrimes.
Over the past several years, some digital asset exchanges have been closed due to security breaches. In many of these instances, the customers
of such digital asset exchanges were not compensated or made whole for the partial or complete losses of their account balances in such
digital asset exchanges. While, generally speaking, smaller digital asset exchanges are less likely to have the infrastructure and capitalization
that make larger digital asset exchanges more stable, larger digital asset exchanges are more likely to be appealing targets for hackers
and malware.

 For example, the collapse
of Mt. Gox, which filed for bankruptcy protection in Japan in late February 2014, demonstrated that even the largest digital asset exchanges
could be subject to abrupt failure with consequences for both users of digital asset exchanges and the digital asset industry as a whole.
In particular, in the two weeks that followed the February 7, 2014, halt of bitcoin withdrawals from Mt. Gox, the value of one bitcoin
fell on other exchanges from around $795 on February 6, 2014, to $578 on February 20, 2014. Additionally, in January 2015, Bitstamp announced
that approximately 19,000 bitcoin had been stolen from its operational or "hot" wallets. Further, in August 2016, it was reported
that almost 120,000 bitcoin worth around $78 million were stolen from Bitfinex, a large digital asset exchange. The value of bitcoin and
other digital assets immediately decreased over 10% following reports of the theft at Bitfinex. In July 2017, FinCEN assessed a $110 million
fine against BTC-E, a now defunct digital asset exchange, for facilitating crimes such as drug sales and ransomware attacks. In addition,
in December 2017, Yapian, the operator of Seoul-based cryptocurrency exchange Youbit, suspended digital asset trading and filed for bankruptcy
following a hack that resulted in a loss of 17% of Yapian's assets. Following the hack, Youbit users were allowed to withdraw approximately
75% of the digital assets in their exchange accounts, with any potential further distributions to be made following Yapian's pending
bankruptcy proceedings. In addition, in January 2018, the Japanese digital asset exchange, Coincheck, was hacked, resulting in losses
of approximately $535 million, and in February 2018, the Italian digital asset exchange, Bitgrail, was hacked, resulting in approximately
$170 million in losses. In May 2019, one of the world's largest digital asset exchanges, Binance, was hacked, resulting in losses
of approximately $40 million.

 Spot markets may be
exposed to fraud and market manipulation.

 The blockchain infrastructure
could be used by certain market participants to exploit arbitrage opportunities through schemes such as front-running, spoofing, pump-and-dump
and fraud across different systems, platforms or geographic locations. As a result of reduced oversight, these schemes may be more prevalent
in digital asset markets than in the general market for financial products.

 The SEC has identified possible
sources of fraud and manipulation in the bitcoin market generally, including, among others (1) "wash trading"; (2) persons
with a dominant position in bitcoin manipulating bitcoin pricing; (3) hacking of the Bitcoin network and trading platforms; (4) malicious
control of the Bitcoin network; (5) trading based on material, non-public information (for example, plans of market participants to significantly
increase or decrease their holdings in bitcoin, new sources of demand for bitcoin, etc.) or based on the dissemination of false and misleading
information; (6) manipulative activity involving purported "stablecoins," including Tether; and (7) fraud and manipulation
at bitcoin trading platforms.

 Over the past several years,
a number of bitcoin spot markets have been closed or faced issues due to fraud. In many of these instances, the customers of such bitcoin
spot markets were not compensated or made whole for the partial or complete losses of their account balances in such bitcoin exchanges.

 In 2019, there were reports
claiming that 80.95% of bitcoin trading volume on digital asset exchanges was false or noneconomic in nature, with specific focus on unregulated
exchanges located outside of the United States. Such reports alleged that certain overseas exchanges have displayed suspicious trading
activity suggestive of a variety of manipulative or fraudulent practices. Other academics and market observers have put forth evidence
to support claims that manipulative trading activity has occurred on certain bitcoin exchanges. For example, in a 2017 paper titled "Price
Manipulation in the Bitcoin Ecosystem" sponsored by the Interdisciplinary Cyber Research Center at Tel Aviv University, a group
of researchers used publicly available trading data, as well as leaked transaction data from a 2014 Mt. Gox security breach, to identify
and analyse the impact of "suspicious trading activity" on Mt. Gox between February and November 2013, which, according to
the authors, caused the price of bitcoin to increase from around $150 to more than $1,000 over a two-month period. In August 2017, it
was reported that a trader or group of traders nicknamed "Spoofy" was placing large orders on Bitfinex without actually executing
them, presumably in order to influence other investors into buying or selling by creating a false appearance that greater demand existed
in the market. In December 2017, an anonymous blogger (publishing under the pseudonym Bitfinex'd) cited publicly available trading
data to support his or her claim that a trading bot nicknamed "Picasso" was pursuing a paint-the-tape-style manipulation strategy
by buying and selling bitcoin and bitcoin cash between affiliated accounts in order to create the appearance of substantial trading activity
and thereby influence the price of such assets.

 In November 2022, FTX, one
of the largest digital asset exchanges by volume at the time, halted customer withdrawals amid rumours of the company's liquidity
issues and likely insolvency, which were subsequently corroborated by its CEO. Shortly thereafter, FTX's CEO resigned and FTX and
many of its affiliates filed for bankruptcy in the United States, while other affiliates have entered insolvency, liquidation, or similar
proceedings around the globe, following which the U.S. Department of Justice brought criminal fraud and other charges, and the SEC and
CFTC brought civil securities and commodities fraud charges, against certain of FTX's and its affiliates' senior executives,
including its former CEO. Around the same time, there were reports that approximately $300-600 million of digital assets were removed
from FTX, and the full facts remain unknown, including whether such removal was the result of a hack, theft, insider activity, or other
improper behaviour.

 The potential consequences
of a spot market's failure or failure to prevent market manipulation could adversely affect the value of the Shares. Any market
abuse, and a loss of investor confidence in bitcoin, may adversely impact pricing trends in bitcoin markets broadly, as well as an investment
in Shares of the Trust.

 Spot markets may be
exposed to wash trading.

 Spot markets on which bitcoin
trades may be susceptible to wash trading. Wash trading occurs when offsetting trades are entered into for other than bona fide reasons,
such as the desire to inflate reported trading volumes. Wash trading may be motivated by non-economic reasons, such as a desire for increased
visibility on popular websites that monitor markets for digital assets so as to improve their attractiveness to investors who look for
maximum liquidity, or it may be motivated by the ability to attract listing fees from token issuers who seek the most liquid and high-volume
exchanges on which to list their coins. Results of wash trading may include unexpected obstacles to trade and erroneous investment decisions
based on false information.

 Even in the United States,
there have been allegations of wash trading even on regulated venues. Any actual or perceived false trading in the digital asset exchange
market, and any other fraudulent or manipulative acts and practices, could adversely affect the value of bitcoin and/or negatively affect
the market perception of bitcoin.

 To the extent that wash trading
either occurs or appears to occur in spot markets on which bitcoin trades, investors may develop negative perceptions about bitcoin and
the digital assets industry more broadly, which could adversely impact the price bitcoin and, therefore, the price of Shares. Wash trading
also may place more legitimate digital asset exchanges at a relative competitive disadvantage.

 Spot markets may be
exposed to front-running.

 Spot markets on which bitcoin
trades may be susceptible to "front-running," which refers to the process when someone uses technology or market advantage
to get prior knowledge of upcoming transactions. Front-running is a frequent activity on centralized as well as decentralized exchanges.
By using bots functioning on a millisecond-scale timeframe, bad actors are able to take advantage of the forthcoming price movement and
make economic gains at the cost of those who had introduced these transactions. The objective of a front runner is to buy a chunk of tokens
at a low price and later sell them at a higher price while simultaneously exiting the position. Front-running happens via manipulations
of gas prices or timestamps, also known as slow matching. To extent that front-running occurs, it may result in investor frustrations
and concerns as to the price integrity of digital asset exchanges and digital assets more generally.

 Momentum pricing.

 The market value of bitcoin
is not based on any kind of claim, nor backed by any physical asset. Instead, the market value depends on the expectation of being usable
in future transactions and continued interest from investors. This strong correlation between an expectation and market value is the basis
for the current (and probable future) volatility of the market value of bitcoin and may increase the likelihood of momentum pricing.

 Momentum pricing typically
is associated with growth stocks and other assets whose valuation, as determined by the investing public, is impacted by appreciation
in value. Momentum pricing may result in speculation regarding future appreciation in the value of digital assets, which inflates prices
and leads to increased volatility. As a result, bitcoin may be more likely to fluctuate in value due to changing investor confidence in
future appreciation or depreciation in prices, which could adversely affect the price of bitcoin, and, in turn, an investment in the Trust.

 The value of a bitcoin as
represented by the Index may also be subject to momentum pricing due to speculation regarding future appreciation in value, leading to
greater volatility that could adversely affect the value of the Shares. Momentum pricing of bitcoin has previously resulted, and may continue
to result, in speculation regarding future appreciation or depreciation in the value of bitcoin, further contributing to volatility and
potentially inflating prices at any given time. These dynamics may impact the value of an investment in Trust.

 Some market observers have
asserted that in time, the value of bitcoin will fall to a fraction of its current value, or even to zero. Bitcoin has not been in existence
long enough for market participants to assess these predictions with any precision, but if these observers are even partially correct,
an investment in the Shares may turn out to be substantially worthless.

 A decline in the adoption
of bitcoin could negatively impact the Trust.

 The Sponsor will not have
any strategy relating to the development of bitcoin and the Bitcoin network. However, a lack of expansion in usage of bitcoin and the
Bitcoin network could adversely affect an investment in Shares.

 The further development and
acceptance of the Bitcoin network, which is part of a new and rapidly changing industry, is subject to a variety of factors that are difficult
to evaluate. For example, the Bitcoin network faces significant obstacles to increasing the usage of bitcoin without resulting in higher
fees or slower transaction settlement times, and attempts to increase the volume of transactions may not be effective. The slowing, stopping
or reversing of the development or acceptance of the Bitcoin network may adversely affect the price of bitcoin and therefore an investment
in the Shares. The further adoption of bitcoin will require growth in its usage and in the Bitcoin network. Adoption of bitcoin will also
require an accommodating regulatory environment.

 The use of bitcoin to, among
other things, buy and sell goods and services is part of a new and rapidly evolving industry that employs digital assets based upon computer-generated
mathematical and/or cryptographic protocols. Bitcoin is a prominent, but not unique, part of this industry. The growth of this industry
is subject to a high degree of uncertainty, as new assets and technological innovations continue to develop and evolve. Currently, there
is relatively limited use of bitcoin in the retail and commercial marketplace in comparison to relatively extensive use as a store of
value, thus contributing to price volatility that could adversely affect an investment in the Shares. However, bitcoin may not be suited
for a number of commercial uses, including those requiring real time payments, partially due to the amount of time that bitcoin transactions
may potentially require in order to clear. This could result in decreasing usage of the network, to the extent that bitcoin does not otherwise
become a store of value asset or meet the needs of another commercial use.

 Today, there is limited use
of bitcoin in the retail, commercial, or payments spaces, and, on a relative basis, speculators make up a significant portion of users.
Certain merchants and major retail and commercial businesses have only recently begun accepting bitcoin and the Bitcoin network as a means
of payment for goods and services. This pattern may contribute to outsized price volatility, which in turn can make bitcoin less attractive
to merchants and commercial parties as a means of payment. A lack of expansion by bitcoin into retail and commercial markets or a contraction
of such use may result in a reduction in the price of bitcoin, which could adversely affect an investment in the Trust.

 In addition, there is no assurance
that bitcoin will maintain its value over the long-term. The value of bitcoin is subject to risks related to its usage. Even if growth
in bitcoin adoption occurs in the near or medium-term, there is no assurance that bitcoin usage will continue to grow over the long-term.
A contraction in use of bitcoin may result in increased volatility or a reduction in the price of bitcoin, which would adversely impact
the value of Shares.

 Irrevocable nature of
blockchain-recorded transactions.

 Bitcoin transactions recorded
on the Bitcoin network are not, from an administrative perspective, reversible without the consent and active participation of the recipient
of the transaction or, in theory, control or consent of a majority of the Bitcoin network's aggregate hash rate. Once a transaction
has been verified and recorded in a block that is added to the blockchain, an incorrect transfer of a bitcoin or a theft of bitcoin generally
will not be reversible, and the Trust may not be capable of seeking compensation for any such transfer or theft. It is possible that,
through computer or human error, or through theft or criminal action, the Trust's bitcoin could be transferred from custody accounts
in incorrect quantities or to unauthorized third parties. To the extent that the Trust is unable to seek a corrective transaction with
such third party or is incapable of identifying the third party that has received the Trust's bitcoin through error or theft, the
Trust will be unable to revert or otherwise recover incorrectly transferred bitcoin. To the extent that the Trust is unable to seek redress
for such error or theft, such loss could adversely affect the value of the Shares.

 The loss or destruction
of a private key required to access bitcoin may be irreversible.

 Digital assets, including
bitcoin, are controllable only by the possessor of both the unique public key and private key or keys relating to the "digital wallet"
in which the digital asset is held. Private keys must be safeguarded and kept private in order to prevent a third party from accessing
the digital asset held in such wallet. To the extent a private key is lost, destroyed or otherwise compromised and no backup of the private
key is accessible, the Trust will be unable to access, and will effectively lose, the bitcoin held in the related digital wallet. In addition,
if the Trust's private keys are misappropriated and the Trust's bitcoin holdings are stolen, including from or by the Bitcoin
Custodian, the Trust could lose some or all of its bitcoin holdings, which would adversely impact an investment in the Shares of the Trust.
Any loss of private keys relating to digital wallets used to store the Trust's Bitcoin would adversely affect the value of the Shares.

 An investment in the
Trust is not a deposit and is not FDIC-insured. Shareholders' limited rights of legal recourse against the Trust, Trustee, Sponsor,
Administrator, Prime Broker and Bitcoin Custodian expose the Trust and its Shareholders to the risk of loss of the Trust's bitcoin
for which no person or entity is liable.

 The Trust is not a banking
institution or otherwise a member of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") or Securities Investor Protection
Corporation ("SIPC") and, therefore, deposits held with or assets held by the Trust are not subject to the protections enjoyed
by depositors with FDIC or SIPC member institutions. In addition, neither the Trust nor the Sponsor insure the Trust's bitcoin.

 While the Bitcoin Custodian
has advised the Sponsor that it has insurance coverage of up to $320 million that covers losses of the digital assets it custodies on
behalf of its clients, including the Trust's bitcoin, resulting from theft, Shareholders cannot be assured that the Bitcoin Custodian
will maintain adequate insurance, that such coverage will cover losses with respect to the Trust's bitcoin, or that sufficient insurance
proceeds will be available to cover the Trust's losses in full. The Bitcoin Custodian's insurance may not cover the type of
losses experienced by the Trust. Alternatively, the Trust may be forced to share such insurance proceeds with other clients or customers
of the Bitcoin Custodian, which could reduce the amount of such proceeds that are available to the Trust. In addition, the bitcoin insurance
market is limited, and the level of insurance maintained by the Bitcoin Custodian may be substantially lower than the assets of the Trust.
While the Bitcoin Custodian maintains certain capital reserve requirements depending on the assets under custody, and such capital reserves
may provide additional means to cover client asset losses, the Trust cannot be assured that the Bitcoin Custodian will maintain capital
reserves sufficient to cover actual or potential losses with respect to the Trust's digital assets.

 Furthermore, under the Custodial
Services Agreement, the Bitcoin Custodian's liability is limited as follows, among others: (i) other than with respect to claims
and losses arising from spot trading of bitcoin, or fraud or wilful misconduct, the Mutually Capped Liabilities (defined below), the Bitcoin
Custodian's aggregate liability under the Custodial Services Agreement shall not exceed the greater of (A) the greater of (x) $5
million and (y) the aggregate fees paid by the Trust to the Bitcoin Custodian in the 12 months prior to the event giving rise to the Bitcoin
Custodian's liability, and (B) the value of the affected bitcoin or cash giving rise to the Bitcoin Custodian's liability;
(ii) the Bitcoin Custodian's aggregate liability in respect of each cold storage address shall not exceed $100 million; (iii) in
respect of the Bitcoin Custodian's obligations to indemnify the Trust and its affiliates against third-party claims and losses to
the extent arising out of or relating to, among others, the Bitcoin Custodian's gross negligence, violation of its confidentiality,
data protection and/or information security obligations, or violation of any law, rule or regulation with respect to the provision of
its services (the "Mutually Capped Liabilities"), the Bitcoin Custodian's liability shall not exceed the greater of
(A) $5 million and (B) the aggregate fees paid by the Trust to the Bitcoin Custodian in the 12 months prior to the event giving rise to
the Bitcoin Custodian's liability; and (iv) in respect of any incidental, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or similar
losses, the Bitcoin Custodian is not liable, even if the Bitcoin Custodian has been advised of or knew or should have known of the possibility
thereof. In general, the Bitcoin Custodian is not liable under the Custodial Services Agreement unless in the event of its negligence,
fraud, material violation of applicable law or wilful misconduct. The Bitcoin Custodian is not liable for delays, suspension of operations,
failure in performance, or interruption of service to the extent it is directly due to a cause or condition beyond the reasonable control
of the Bitcoin Custodian. In the event of potential losses incurred by the Trust as a result of the Bitcoin Custodian losing control of
the Trust's bitcoin or failing to properly execute instructions on behalf of the Trust, the Bitcoin Custodian's liability
with respect to the Trust will be subject to certain limitations which may allow it to avoid liability for potential losses or may be
insufficient to cover the value of such potential losses, even if the Bitcoin Custodian directly caused such losses. Furthermore, the
insurance maintained by the Bitcoin Custodian may be insufficient to cover its liabilities to the Trust.

 Similarly, under the Prime
Broker Agreement, the Prime Broker's liability is limited as follows, among others: (i) other than with respect to claims and losses
arising from spot trading of bitcoin, or fraud or wilful misconduct, or the PB Mutually Capped Liabilities (defined below), the Prime
Broker's aggregate liability shall not exceed the greater of (A) the greater of (x) $5 million and (y) the aggregate fees paid by
the Trust to the Prime Broker in the 12 months prior to the event giving rise to the Prime Broker's liability, and (B) the value
of the cash or affected bitcoin giving rise to the Prime Broker's liability; (ii) in respect of the Prime Broker's obligations
to indemnify the Trust and its affiliates against third-party claims and losses to the extent arising out of or relating to, among others,
the Prime Broker's gross negligence, violation of its confidentiality, data protection and/or information security obligations,
violation of any law, rule or regulation with respect to the provision of its services, or the full amount of the Trust's assets
lost due to the insolvency of or security event at a Connected Trading Venue (as defined below) (the "PB Mutually Capped Liabilities"),
the Prime Broker's liability shall not exceed the greater of (A) $5 million and (B) the aggregate fees paid by the Trust to the
Prime Broker in the 12 months prior to the event giving rise to the Prime Broker's liability; and (iii) in respect of any incidental,
indirect, special, punitive, consequential or similar losses, the Prime Broker is not liable, even if the Prime Broker has been advised
of or knew or should have known of the possibility thereof. In general, with limited exceptions (such as for failing to execute an order),
the Prime Broker is not liable under the Prime Broker Agreement unless in the event of its gross negligence, fraud, material violation
of applicable law or wilful misconduct. The Prime Broker is not liable for delays, suspension of operations, failure in performance, or
interruption of service to the extent it is directly due to a cause or condition beyond the reasonable control of the Prime Broker. These
and the other limitations on the Prime Broker's liability may allow it to avoid liability for potential losses or may be insufficient
to cover the value of such potential losses, even if the Prime Broker directly caused such losses. Both the Trust and the Prime Broker
and its affiliates (including the Bitcoin Custodian) are required to indemnify each other under certain circumstances.

 Moreover, in the event of
an insolvency or bankruptcy of the Prime Broker (in the case of the Trading Balance) or the Bitcoin Custodian (in the case of the Vault
Balance) in the future, given that the contractual protections and legal rights of customers with respect to digital assets held on their
behalf by third parties are relatively untested in a bankruptcy of an entity such as the Bitcoin Custodian or Prime Broker in the virtual
currency industry, there is a risk that customers' assets – including the Trust's assets – may be considered the
property of the bankruptcy estate of the Prime Broker (in the case of the Trading Balance) or the Bitcoin Custodian (in the case of the
Vault Balance), and customers – including the Trust – may be at risk of being treated as general unsecured creditors of such
entities and subject to the risk of total loss or markdowns on value of such assets.

 The Custodial Services Agreement
contains an agreement by the parties to treat the bitcoin credited to the Trust's Vault Balance as financial assets under Article
8 of the New York Uniform Commercial Code ("Article 8"), in addition to stating that the Bitcoin Custodian will serve as fiduciary
and custodian on the Trust's behalf. The Bitcoin Custodian's parent, Coinbase Global Inc., has stated in its most recent public
securities filings that in light of the inclusion in its custody agreements of provisions relating to Article 8 it believes that a court
would not treat custodied digital assets as part of its general estate in the event the Custodian were to experience insolvency. However,
due to the novelty of digital asset custodial arrangements courts have not yet considered this type of treatment for custodied digital
assets and it is not possible to predict with certainty how they would rule in such a scenario. If the Bitcoin Custodian became subject
to insolvency proceedings and a court were to rule that the custodied bitcoin were part of the Bitcoin Custodian's general estate
and not the property of the Trust, then the Trust would be treated as a general unsecured creditor in the Bitcoin Custodian's insolvency
proceedings and the Trust could be subject to the loss of all or a significant portion of its assets. Moreover, in the event of the bankruptcy
of the Bitcoin Custodian, an automatic stay could go into effect and protracted litigation could be required in order to recover the assets
held with the Bitcoin Custodian, all of which could significantly and negatively impact the Trust's operations and the value of
the Shares.

 With respect to the Prime
Broker Agreement, there is a risk that the Trading Balance, in which the Trust's bitcoin and cash is held in omnibus accounts by
the Prime Broker, could be considered part of the Prime Broker's bankruptcy estate in the event of the Prime Broker's bankruptcy.
The Prime Broker Agreement contains an Article 8 opt-in clause with respect to the Trust's assets held in the Trading Balance.

 The amount of bitcoin that
may be held in the Trading Balance will be limited to the amount necessary to process a given creation or redemption transaction, as applicable,
or to pay for Trust Expenses not assumed by the Sponsor in consideration for the Sponsor Fee.

 The Prime Broker is not required
to hold any of the bitcoin or cash in the Trust's Trading Balance in segregation. Within the Trading Balance, the Prime Broker Agreement
provides that the Trust does not have an identifiable claim to any particular bitcoin (and cash). Instead, the Trust's Trading Balance
represents an entitlement to a pro rata share of the bitcoin (and cash) the Prime Broker has allocated to the omnibus wallets the Prime
Broker holds, as well as the accounts in the Prime Broker's name that the Prime Broker maintains at Connected Trading Venues (the
"Connected Trading Venue") (which are typically held on an omnibus, rather than segregated, basis). If the Prime Broker suffers
an insolvency event, there is a risk that the Trust's assets held in the Trading Balance could be considered part of the Prime Broker's
bankruptcy estate and the Trust could be treated as a general unsecured creditor of the Prime Broker, which could result in losses for
the Trust and Shareholders. Moreover, in the event of the bankruptcy of the Prime Broker, an automatic stay could go into effect and protracted
litigation could be required in order to recover the assets held with the Prime Broker, all of which could significantly and negatively
impact the Trust's operations and the value of the Shares.

 Under the Trust Agreement,
the Trustee and the Sponsor will not be liable for any liability or expense incurred, including, without limitation, as a result of any
loss of bitcoin by the Bitcoin Custodian or Prime Broker, absent wilful misconduct, gross negligence, reckless disregard or bad faith
on the part of the Trustee or the Sponsor or breach by the Sponsor of the Trust Agreement, as the case may be. As a result, the recourse
of the Trust or the Shareholders to the Trustee or the Sponsor, including in the event of a loss of bitcoin by the Bitcoin Custodian or
Prime Broker, is limited.

 The Shareholders' recourse
against the Sponsor, the Trustee, and the Trust's other service providers for the services they provide to the Trust, including,
without limitation, those relating to the holding of bitcoin or the provision of instructions relating to the movement of bitcoin, is
limited. For the avoidance of doubt, neither the Sponsor, the Trustee, nor any of their affiliates, nor any other party has guaranteed
the assets or liabilities, or otherwise assumed the liabilities, of the Trust, or the obligations or liabilities of any service provider
to the Trust, including, without limitation, the Bitcoin Custodian and Prime Broker. The Prime Broker Agreement and Custodial Services
Agreement provide that neither the Sponsor, the Trustee, nor their affiliates shall have any obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever,
by guaranty, enforcement or otherwise, with respect to the performance of any the Trust's obligations, agreements, representations
or warranties under the Prime Broker Agreement or Custodial Services Agreement or any transaction thereunder. Consequently, a loss may
be suffered with respect to the Trust's bitcoin that is not covered by the Bitcoin Custodian's insurance and for which no
person is liable in damages. As a result, the recourse of the Trust or the Shareholders, under applicable law, is limited.

 Loss of a critical banking
relationship for, or the failure of a bank used by, the Prime Broker could adversely impact the Trust's ability to create or redeem
Baskets, or could cause losses to the Trust.

 To the extent that the Trust
or Prime Broker faces difficulty establishing or maintaining banking relationships, the loss of the Trust or Prime Broker's banking
partners, the imposition of operational restrictions by these banking partners and the inability for the Trust or the Prime Broker to
utilize other financial institutions may result in a disruption of creation and redemption activity of the Trust or the Prime Broker,
or cause other operational disruptions or adverse effects for the Trust or the Prime Broker. In the future, it is possible that the Trust
or the Prime Broker could be unable to establish accounts at new banking partners or establish new banking relationships, or that the
banks with which the Trust or the Prime Broker is able to establish relationships may not be as large or well-capitalized or subject to
the same degree of prudential supervision as the existing providers.

 The Trust could also suffer
losses in the event that a bank in which the Trust holds assets fails, becomes insolvent, enters receivership, is taken over by regulators,
enters financial distress, or otherwise suffers adverse effects to its financial condition or operational status. Recently, some banks
have experienced financial distress. For example, on March 8, 2023, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation ("DFPI")
announced that Silvergate Bank had entered voluntary liquidation, and on March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank, ("SVB"), was
closed by the DFPI, which appointed the FDIC, as receiver. Similarly, on March 12, 2023, the New York Department of Financial Services
took possession of Signature Bank and appointed the FDIC as receiver. A joint statement by the Department of the Treasury, the Federal
Reserve and the FDIC on March 12, 2023, stated that depositors in Signature and SVB will have access to all of their funds, including
funds held in deposit accounts, in excess of the insured amount. On May 1, 2023, First Republic Bank was closed by the California Department
of Financial Protection and Innovation, which appointed the FDIC as receiver. Following a bidding process, the FDIC entered into a purchase
and assumption agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, to acquire the substantial majority of the assets and assume
certain liabilities of First Republic Bank from the FDIC.

 The Prime Broker has historically
maintained banking relationships with Silvergate Bank and Signature Bank. While the Sponsor does not believe there is a direct risk to
the Trust's assets from the failures of Silvergate Bank or Signature Bank, in the future, changing circumstances and market conditions,
some of which may be beyond the Trust's or the Sponsor's control, could impair the Trust's ability to access the Trust's
cash held with the Prime Broker. If the Prime Broker were to experience financial distress or its financial condition is otherwise affected
by the failure of its banking partners, the Prime Broker's ability to provide services to the Trust could be affected. Moreover,
the future failure of a bank at which the Prime Broker maintains customer cash could result in losses to the Trust, to the extent the
balances are not subject to deposit insurance, notwithstanding the regulatory requirements to which the Prime Broker is subject or other
potential protections.

 The Bitcoin Custodian
and Prime Broker may act in the same or similar capacity for other competing products.

 Currently, the number of digital
assets intermediaries with the reputation and operational capability to serve as Bitcoin Custodian and/or Prime Broker to the Trust or
other competing products is limited. The Bitcoin Custodian and Prime Broker may act in the same or similar capacity for other competing
products, including exchange-traded products offering exposure to the spot bitcoin market or other digital assets. The Trust is therefore
subject to risks associated with these competing products utilizing the same service providers for bitcoin custodial and prime brokerage
services.

 To the extent that exchange-traded
products offering exposure to the spot bitcoin market or other digital assets utilize substantially the same service providers for bitcoin
custodial and prime brokerage services, this industry concentration may result in the development of fewer other digital assets intermediaries
with the reputation and operational capability to provide bitcoin custodial and prime brokerage services to the Trust or other competing
products. This, in turn, could make it difficult for the Trust to find and appoint a replacement bitcoin custodian or prime broker, to
the extent the Sponsor deems such action necessary.

 This industry concentration
also may have the effect of magnifying the risks associated with the Bitcoin Custodian and Prime Broker, as operational disruptions or
adverse developments impacting the Bitcoin Custodian or the Prime Broker may be felt on an industry-wide basis. A loss of confidence or
breach of the Bitcoin Custodian or Prime Broker may adversely affect not only the Trust and the value of an investment in the Shares,
but also these competing products utilizing the same service providers for bitcoin custodial and prime brokerage services and, more generally,
exchange-traded products offering exposure to the spot bitcoin market or other digital assets. These industry-wide adverse effects could
result in a broader loss of confidence in exchange-traded products offering exposure to the spot bitcoin market or other digital assets,
which could further impact the Trust and the value of an investment in the Shares.

 The Prime Broker routes
orders through Connected Trading Venues in connection with trading services under the Prime Broker Agreement. The loss or failure of any
such Connected Trading Venues may adversely affect the Prime Broker's business and cause losses for the Trust.

 In connection with trading
services under the Prime Broker Agreement, the Prime Broker routinely routes customer orders to Connected Trading Venues, which are third-party
exchanges or other trading venues (including the trading venue operated by the Prime Broker). In connection with these activities, the
Prime Broker may hold bitcoin with such Connected Trading Venues in order to effect customer orders, including the Trust's orders.
However, the Prime Broker has represented to the Sponsor that no customer cash is held at Connected Trading Venues. If the Prime Broker
were to experience a disruption in the Prime Broker's access to these Connected Trading Venues, the Prime Broker's trading
services under the Prime Broker Agreement could be adversely affected to the extent that the Prime Broker is limited in its ability to
execute order flow for its customers, including the Trust. In addition, while the Prime Broker has policies and procedures to help mitigate
the Prime Broker's risks related to routing orders through third-party trading venues, if any of these third-party trading venues
experience any technical, legal, regulatory, or other adverse events, such as shutdowns, delays, system failures, suspension of withdrawals,
illiquidity, insolvency, or loss of customer assets, the Prime Broker might not be able to fully recover the customer's bitcoin
that the Prime Broker has deposited with these third parties. As a result, the Prime Broker's business, operating results and financial
condition could be adversely affected, potentially resulting in its failure to provide services to the Trust or perform its obligations
under the Prime Broker Agreement, and the Trust could suffer resulting losses or disruptions to its operations. The failure of a Connected
Trading Venue at which the Prime Broker maintains customer bitcoin, including bitcoin associated with the Trust, could result in losses
to the Trust, notwithstanding the regulatory requirements to which the Prime Broker is subject or other potential protections.

 A disruption of the
Internet may affect bitcoin operations, which may adversely affect the bitcoin industry and an investment in the Trust.

 The functionality of the Bitcoin
network relies on the Internet. A significant disruption of Internet connectivity (i.e., affecting large numbers of users or geographic
regions) could disrupt the Bitcoin network's functionality and operations until the disruption in the Internet is resolved. A disruption
in the Internet could adversely affect an investment in the Trust or the ability of the Trust to operate. In particular, some variants
of digital assets have experienced a number of denial-of-service attacks, which have led to temporary delays in block creation and digital
asset transfers. While in certain cases in response to an attack, an additional "hard fork" (discussed below) has been introduced
to increase the cost of certain network functions, the relevant network has continued to be the subject of additional attacks. Moreover,
it is possible that as bitcoin increases in value, it may become a bigger target for hackers and subject to more frequent hacking and
denial-of-service attacks.

 Potential changes to
the Bitcoin network's protocols and software could, if accepted and authorized by the Bitcoin network community, adversely affect
an investment in the Trust.

 The Bitcoin network uses a
cryptographic protocol to govern the interactions within the Bitcoin network. A loose community of core developers has evolved to informally
manage the source code for the protocol. Membership in the community of core developers evolves over time, largely based on self-determined
participation in the resource section dedicated to the Bitcoin network on Github.com. The core developers can propose amendments to the
Bitcoin network's source code that, if accepted by miners and users, could alter the protocols and software of the Bitcoin network
and the properties of bitcoin. These alterations occur through software upgrades and could potentially include changes to the irreversibility
of transactions and limitations on the mining of new bitcoin, which could undermine the appeal and market value of bitcoin. Alternatively,
software upgrades and other changes to the protocols of the Bitcoin network could fail to work as intended or could introduce bugs, security
risks, or otherwise adversely affect, the Bitcoin network. As a result, the Bitcoin network could be subject to new protocols and software
in the future that may adversely affect an investment in the Trust.

 The open-source structure
of the Bitcoin network protocol means that the core developers and other contributors are generally not directly compensated for their
contributions in maintaining and developing the Bitcoin network protocol. A failure to properly monitor and upgrade the Bitcoin network
protocol could damage the Bitcoin network and an investment in the Trust.

 The Bitcoin network operates
based on an open-source protocol maintained by a group of core developers and other contributors, largely on the GitHub resource section
dedicated to development of the Bitcoin network. As the Bitcoin network protocol is not sold or made available subject to licensing or
subscription fees and its use does not generate revenues for its development team, the core developers are generally not compensated for
maintaining and updating the source code for the Bitcoin network protocol. Consequently, there is a lack of financial incentive for developers
to maintain or develop the Bitcoin network and the core developers may lack the resources to adequately address emerging issues with the
Bitcoin network protocol. Although the Bitcoin network is currently supported by the core developers, there can be no guarantee that such
support will continue or be sufficient in the future. Alternatively, entities whose interests are at odds with other participants in the
Bitcoin network may seek to obtain control over the Bitcoin network by influencing core developers. For example, malicious actors could
attempt to bribe a core developer or group of core developers to propose certain changes to the network core developers. In addition,
a bad actor could also attempt to interfere with the operation of the Bitcoin network by attempting to exercise a malign influence over
a core developer. To the extent that material issues arise with the Bitcoin network protocol and the core developers and open-source contributors
are unable to address the issues adequately or in a timely manner, the Bitcoin network and an investment in the Trust may be adversely
affected.

 Decentralized governance
of the Bitcoin network could have a negative impact on the performance of the Trust.

 Governance of decentralized
networks, such as the Bitcoin network, is achieved through voluntary consensus and open competition. In other words, the Bitcoin network
has no central decision-making body or clear manner in which participants can come to an agreement other than through overwhelming consensus.
The lack of clarity on governance may adversely affect bitcoin's utility and ability to grow and face challenges, both of which
may require solutions and directed effort to overcome problems, especially long-term problems. For example, a seemingly simple technical
issue once divided the Bitcoin network community: namely, whether to increase the block size of the blockchain or implement another change
to increase the scalability of bitcoin, known as "segregated witness," and help it continue to grow. See "Risk Factors—The
Bitcoin network faces scaling challenges and efforts to increase the volume of transactions may not be successful."

 To the extent lack of clarity
in corporate governance of the Bitcoin network leads to ineffective decision-making that slows development and growth, the value of the
Shares may be adversely affected.

 Anonymity and illicit
financing risk.

 Although transaction details
of peer-to-peer transactions are recorded on the Bitcoin blockchain, a buyer or seller of digital assets on a peer-to-peer basis directly
on the Bitcoin network may never know to whom the public key belongs or the true identity of the party with whom it is transacting. Public
key addresses are randomized sequences of alphanumeric characters that, standing alone, do not provide sufficient information to identify
users. In addition, certain technologies may obscure the origin or chain of custody of digital assets. The opaque nature of the market
poses asset verification challenges for market participants, regulators and auditors and gives rise to an increased risk of manipulation
and fraud, including the potential for Ponzi schemes, bucket shops and pump and dump schemes. Digital assets have in the past been used
to facilitate illicit activities. If a digital asset was used to facilitate illicit activities, businesses that facilitate transactions
in such digital assets could be at increased risk of potential criminal or civil lawsuits, or of having banking or other services cut
off, and such digital asset could be removed from digital asset exchanges. Any of the aforementioned occurrences could adversely affect
the price of the relevant digital asset, the attractiveness of the respective blockchain network and an investment in the Shares. If the
Trust, the Sponsor or the Trustee were to transact with a sanctioned entity, the Trust, the Sponsor or the Trustee would be at risk of
potential criminal or civil lawsuits or liability.

 The Trust takes measures with
the objective of reducing illicit financing risks in connection with the Trust's activities. However, illicit financing risks are
present in the digital asset markets, including markets for bitcoin. There can be no assurance that the measures employed by the Trust
will prove successful in reducing illicit financing risks, and the Trust is subject to the complex illicit financing risks and vulnerabilities
present in the digital asset markets. If such risks eventuate, the Trust, the Sponsor or the Trustee or their affiliates could face civil
or criminal liability, fines, penalties, or other punishments, be subject to investigation, have their assets frozen, lose access to banking
services or services provided by other service providers, or suffer disruptions to their operations, any of which could negatively affect
the Trust's ability to operate or cause losses in value of the Shares.

 The Sponsor and the Trust
have adopted and implemented policies and procedures that are designed to ensure that they do not violate applicable AML and sanctions
laws and regulations and to comply with any applicable KYC laws and regulations. The Sponsor and the Trust will only interact with known
third party service providers with respect to whom it has engaged in a due diligence process to ensure a thorough KYC process, such as
the Authorized Participants and the Bitcoin Custodian. Authorized Participants, as broker-dealers, and the Bitcoin Custodian, as a limited
purpose trust company subject to New York Banking Law, are subject to the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act (as amended) ("BSA") and U.S.
economic sanctions laws. In addition, the Trust will only accept creations and redemption requests from regulated Authorized Participants
who themselves are subject to applicable sanctions and anti-money laundering laws and have compliance programs that are designed to ensure
compliance with those laws. In addition, Bitcoin Counterparties will be contractually obligated that all bitcoin they deliver to the Trust
will be from lawful sources. The Trust will not hold any bitcoin except those that have been delivered by a Bitcoin Counterparty in connection
with creation requests.

 The Bitcoin Custodian has
adopted and implemented an anti-money laundering and sanctions compliance program, which provides additional protections to ensure that
the Sponsor and the Trust do not transact with a sanctioned party. Notably, the Bitcoin Custodian performs Know-Your-Transaction ("KYT")
screening using blockchain analytics to identify, detect, and mitigate the risk of transacting with a sanctioned or other unlawful actor.
Pursuant to the Bitcoin Custodian's KYT program, any bitcoin that is delivered to the Trust's custody account will undergo
screening to ensure that the origins of that bitcoin are not illicit.

 There is no guarantee that
such procedures will always be effective. If the Authorized Participants or Bitcoin Counterparties have inadequate policies, procedures
and controls for complying with applicable anti-money laundering and applicable sanctions laws or the Trust's diligence is ineffective,
violations of such laws could result, which could result in regulatory liability for the Trust, the Sponsor, the Trustee or their affiliates
under such laws, including governmental fines, penalties, and other punishments, as well as potential liability to or cessation of services
by the Prime Broker and its affiliates, including the Bitcoin Custodian. Any of the foregoing could result in losses to the Shareholders
or negatively affect the Trust's ability to operate.

 The actual or perceived
use of bitcoin and other digital assets in illicit transactions, which may adversely affect the bitcoin industry and an investment in
the Trust.

 Recent years have seen digital
assets used at times as part of criminal activities and to launder criminal proceeds, as means of payment for illicit activities, or as
an investment fraud currency. Although the number of cases involving cryptocurrencies for the financing of terrorism remains limited,
criminals have nonetheless become more sophisticated in their use of digital assets.

 Although Bitcoin transaction
details are logged on the blockchain, a buyer or seller of Bitcoin may never know to whom the public key belongs or the true identity
of the party with whom it is transacting, as public key addresses are randomized sequences of alphanumeric characters that, standing alone,
do not provide sufficient information to identify users. Further, identifying users can be made even more difficult where a user utilizes
a tumbling or mixing services (e.g., Tornado Cash) to further obfuscate transaction details.

 The bitcoin industry and an
investment in the Trust may be adversely affected to the extent that digital assets are increasingly used in connection with illicit transactions
or are perceived as being used in connection with illicit transactions.

 The inability to recognize
the economic benefit of a "fork" or an "airdrop" could adversely impact an investment in the Trust.

 The only digital asset to
be held by the Trust will be bitcoin.

 From time to time, the Trust
may be entitled to or come into possession of rights to acquire, or otherwise establish dominion and control over, any virtual currency
or other asset or right, which rights are incident to the Trust's ownership of bitcoin and arise without any action of the Trust,
or of the Sponsor or Sub-Adviser on behalf of the Trust ("Incidental Rights") and/or virtual currency tokens, or other asset
or right, acquired by the Trust through the exercise (subject to the applicable provisions of the Trust Agreement) of any Incidental Right
("IR Virtual Currency") by virtue of its ownership of bitcoin, generally through a fork in the Bitcoin blockchain, an airdrop
offered to holders of bitcoin or other similar event. Pursuant to the Trust Agreement, the Sponsor has the right, in their discretion,
to determine what action to take in connection with the Trust's entitlement to or ownership of Incidental Rights or any IR Virtual
Currency. Under the terms of the Trust Agreement, the Trust may take any lawful action necessary or desirable in connection with the Trust's
ownership of Incidental Rights, including the acquisition of IR Virtual Currency, as determined by the Sponsor in the Sponsor's
sole discretion, unless such action would adversely affect the status of the Trust as a grantor trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes
or otherwise be prohibited by the Trust Agreement.

 With respect to any fork,
airdrop or similar event, the Sponsor will cause the Trust to irrevocably abandon the Incidental Rights or IR Virtual Currency. In the
event the Trust seeks to change this position, an application would need to be filed with the SEC by the Exchange seeking approval to
amend its listing rules.

 Investors should be aware
that investing in Shares of the Trust is not equivalent to investing directly in bitcoin. An investor does not have a claim to any "forked"
assets. Unless otherwise announced, the Sponsor and the Sub-Adviser, as applicable on behalf of the Trust, will not support the inclusion
of any forked assets.

 Unless an announcement is
made informing investors that a fork will be supported, a newly-forked asset should be considered ineligible for inclusion in the Trust.

 Network Forks.

 Bitcoin, along with many other
digital assets, are open-source projects. The infrastructure and ecosystem that powers the Bitcoin network are developed by different
parties, including affiliated and non-affiliated engineers, developers, miners, platform developers, evangelists, marketers, exchange
operators and other companies based around a service regarding bitcoin, each of whom may have different motivations, drivers, philosophies
and incentives.

 As a result, any individual
can propose refinements or improvements to the Bitcoin network's source code through one or more software upgrades that could alter
the protocols governing the Bitcoin network and the properties of bitcoin. When a modification is proposed and a substantial majority
of users and miners consent to the modification, the change is implemented, and the Bitcoin network remains uninterrupted. However, a
"hard fork" occurs if less than a substantial majority of users and miners consent to the proposed modification, and the modification
is not compatible with the software prior to its modification. In other words, two incompatible networks would then exist: (1) one network
running the pre-modified software and (2) another network running the modified software. The effect of such a fork would be the existence
of two versions of bitcoin running in parallel, and the creation of a new digital asset which lacks interchangeability with its predecessor.
This is in contrast to a "soft fork," or a proposed modification to the software governing the network that results in a post-update
network that is compatible with the network as it existed prior to the update, because it restricts the network operations that can be
performed after the update.

 Forks occur for a variety
of reasons. A fork could occur after a significant security breach. Participants on the network could elect to "fork" the
network to its state before the hack, effectively reversing the hack. A fork could also be introduced by an unintentional, unanticipated
software flaw in the multiple versions of otherwise compatible software users run. Such a fork could adversely affect bitcoin's
viability. It is possible, however, that a substantial number of users and miners could adopt an incompatible version of the digital asset
while resisting community-led efforts to merge the two chains. This would result in a permanent fork. For example, in July 2016, Ethereum
"forked" into Ethereum and a new digital asset, Ethereum Classic, as a result of the Ethereum network community's response
to a significant security breach in which an anonymous hacker exploited a smart contract running on the Ethereum network to syphon approximately
$60 million of ETH held by the DAO, a distributed autonomous organization, into a segregated account. In response to the hack, most participants
in the Ethereum community elected to adopt a "fork" that effectively reversed the hack. However, a minority of users continued
to develop the original blockchain, now referred to as "Ethereum Classic" with the digital asset on that blockchain now referred
to as Ethereum Classic, or ETC. ETC now trades on several digital asset exchanges.

 A fork may occur as a result
of disagreement among network participants as to whether a proposed modification to the network should be accepted. For example, on August
1, 2017, after extended debates among developers as to how to improve the Bitcoin network's transaction capacity, the Bitcoin network
was forked by a group of developers and miners resulting in the creation of a new blockchain, which underlies the new digital asset "Bitcoin
Cash." Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash now operate on separate, independent blockchains. Since then, the Bitcoin network has forked several
times to launch new digital assets, such as Bitcoin Gold, Bitcoin Silver and Bitcoin Diamond. Litecoin was also the result of a fork from
the original Bitcoin blockchain.

 Significant forks are typically
announced several months in advance. The circumstances of each fork are unique, and their relative significance varies. It is possible
that a particular fork may result in a significant disruption to bitcoin and, potentially, may result in broader market disruption should
pricing become difficult following the fork. It is not possible to predict with accuracy the impact that any anticipated fork could have
or for how long any resulting disruption may exist.

 Forks may have a detrimental
effect on the value of bitcoin, including by negatively affecting cryptocurrency allocations or by failing to capture of the full value
of the newly-forked bitcoin if it is excluded from the Index. Forks can also introduce new security risks. For example, forks may result
in "replay attacks," or attacks in which transactions from one network were rebroadcast to nefarious effect on the other network.
After a hard fork, it may become easier for an individual miner or mining pool's hashing power to exceed 50% of the processing power
of the digital asset network, thereby making digital assets that rely on proof of work more susceptible to attack. For example, when the
Ethereum and Ethereum Classic networks, two other digital asset networks, split in July 2016, replay attacks, in which transactions from
one network were rebroadcast to nefarious effect on the other network, plagued Ethereum exchanges through at least October 2016. An Ethereum
exchange announced in July 2016 that it had lost 40,000 Ethereum Classic, worth about $100,000 at that time, as a result of replay attacks.
Similar replay attack concerns occurred in connection with the Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV networks split in November 2018. Another possible
result of a hard fork is an inherent decrease in the level of security due to significant amounts of mining power remaining on one network
or migrating instead to the new forked network. After a hard fork, it may become easier for an individual miner or mining pool's
hashing power to exceed 50% of the processing power of a digital asset network that retained or attracted less mining power, thereby making
digital assets that rely on proof-of-work more susceptible to attack.

 A hard fork may adversely
affect the price of bitcoin at the time of announcement or adoption. For example, the announcement of a hard fork could lead to increased
demand for the pre fork digital asset, in anticipation that ownership of the pre fork digital asset would entitle holders to a new digital
asset following the fork. The increased demand for the pre fork digital asset may cause the price of the digital asset to rise. After
the hard fork, it is possible the aggregate price of the two versions of the digital asset running in parallel would be less than the
price of the digital asset immediately prior to the fork. Furthermore, while the Sponsor will, as permitted by the terms of the Trust
Agreement, determine which network is generally accepted as the Bitcoin network and should therefore be considered the appropriate network
for the Trust's purposes, there is no guarantee that the Sponsor will choose the network and the associated digital asset that is
ultimately the most valuable fork. Either of these events could therefore adversely impact the value of the Shares. When Bitcoin Cash
forked from the Bitcoin network, the value of Bitcoin went from $2,800 to $2,700.

 In principle, a hard fork
could change the source code for the Bitcoin network, including the source code which limits the supply of bitcoin to 21 million. Although
many observers believe this is unlikely at present, there is no guarantee that the current 21 million supply cap for outstanding bitcoin,
which is estimated to be reached by approximately the year 2140, will not be changed. If a hard fork changing the 21 million supply cap
is widely adopted, the limit on the supply of bitcoin could be lifted, which could have an adverse impact on the value of bitcoin and
the value of the Shares.

 If bitcoin were to fork into
two digital assets, the Trust may hold, in addition to its existing bitcoin balance, a right to claim an equivalent amount of the new
"forked" asset following the hard fork. However, the Index does not track forks involving bitcoin. The Trust has adopted procedures
to address situations involving a fork that results in the issuance of new alternative bitcoin that the Trust may receive. The holder
of bitcoin has no discretion in a hard fork; it merely has the right to claim the new bitcoin on a pro rata basis while it continues to
hold the same number of bitcoin.

 Airdrops.

 Bitcoin may become subject
to an occurrence similar to a fork, which is known as an "airdrop." In an airdrop, the promotors of a new digital asset announce
to holders of another digital asset that they will be entitled to claim a certain amount of the new digital asset for free, based on the
fact that they hold such other digital asset. For example, in March 2017, the promoters of Stellar Lumens announced that anyone that owned
bitcoin as of June 26, 2017, could claim, until August 27, 2017, a certain amount of Stellar Lumens. Airdrops are not included in the
Index under its current methodology.

 The Index currently does not
track airdrops involving bitcoin. Accordingly, the Trust will not participate in airdrops.

 Bitcoin is subject to
cybersecurity risks, which could adversely affect an investment in the Trust or the ability of the Trust to operate.

 Users of bitcoin, and therefore
investors in bitcoin-related investment products such as the Trust, are exposed to an elevated risk of fraud and loss, including, but
not limited to, through cyber-attacks. Bitcoin can be stolen, and bitcoin stored in a digital wallet, accessible via private key, can
be compromised. While digital wallets do not store or contain the actual bitcoin, they store public and private keys, which are used as
an address for receiving bitcoin or for spending the bitcoin, with both forms of transactions recorded on the public immutable ledger,
the blockchain. By using the private key, a person is able to spend bitcoin, effectively sending it away from the account and recording
that transaction on the blockchain. If a private key is compromised, bitcoin associated with that specific public key may be stolen. Unlike
traditional banking transactions, once a transaction has been added to the blockchain, it cannot be reversed. Several exchanges specializing
in sales of bitcoin, for example, have already had their operations impacted by cyber-attacks.

 Thefts and cyber-attacks can
have a negative impact on the reputation, market price, value, or liquidity of bitcoin. Through investment in the Trust, investors would
be indirectly exposed to the risk and potential impact of a cyber-attack. A loss associated with cyberattack, including a total loss,
is possible. While the Sponsor and the Bitcoin Custodian have taken reasonable measures to prevent a theft or hacking of the Trust's
bitcoin holdings, such an event cannot be fully excluded from the Trust's overall market exposure, and the losses associated with
such an event would be borne by investors.

 Digital asset networks, including
the Bitcoin network, are subject to control by entities that capture a significant amount of the network's processing power or a
significant number of developers important for the operation and maintenance of such digital asset network. If a single miner, or a group
of miners acting in concert, control (even temporarily) a majority of the network mining power (known as hash power) of a particular blockchain
network, this control could be used to undertake harmful acts. Such an attack is called a "51%" attack. For example, an individual
or group controlling a majority of the Bitcoin network could prevent transactions from posting accurately, or at all, on the blockchain.
It could be possible for the malicious actor to control, exclude or modify the ordering of transactions, though it could not generate
new bitcoin or transactions. Further, a bad actor could "double-spend" its own bitcoin (i.e., spend the same bitcoin in more
than one transaction) and prevent the confirmation of other users' transactions for so long as it maintained control. To the extent
that such malicious actor or botnet did not yield its control of the processing power on the Bitcoin network or the network community
did not reject the fraudulent blocks as malicious, reversing any changes made to the blockchain may not be possible. Further, a malicious
actor or botnet could create a flood of transactions in order to slow down confirmations of transactions on the Bitcoin network.

 Other digital asset networks
have been subject to malicious activity achieved through control of over 50% of the processing power on the network. Any similar attacks
on the Bitcoin network could negatively impact the value of bitcoin and the value of the Shares.

 In the past, mining pools
have gained control of significant amounts of the processing power or "hash rate" of the Bitcoin network. If a mining pool
obtains control of more than 50% of the hash rate of the Bitcoin network, a malicious actor would be able to gain full control of the
network and the ability to alter the blockchain. During May and June 2014, mining pool gHash. IO's processing power approached and,
during a twenty-four to forty-eight hour period, may have exceeded 50% of the processing power on the Bitcoin network. Although no malicious
activity or abnormal transaction recording was observed at the time, the incident focused attention on the influence of mining pools.
Mining pools have become increasingly concentrated both in terms of the providers and the geographic distribution of providers in recent
years.

 Moreover, certain hardware
providers may create hardware that collectively has majority power, and the manufacturer could potentially exert control itself. For example,
it was discovered that the mining machines produced by Bitmain contained backdoor code that would allow Bitmain to remotely shut down
the mining machines. This vulnerability is colloquially referred to as the "Antbleed backdoor." At worst, the Antbleed backdoor
could have allowed Bitmain to shut off up to an estimated 70% of the global hash rate. Bitmain released an official response to the controversy
claiming that the Antbleed backdoor had no malicious intent, and on April 28, 2017, the day following the discovery of the Antbleed backdoor,
Bitmain released new source code and firmware upgrades for its mining hardware to remove the backdoor. The provision of bitcoin mining
hardware is also becoming increasingly centralized and concentrated among a few key players such as Bitmain.

 A 51% attack is more likely
to happen in the context of digital assets with smaller market capitalizations due to the reduced computing power threshold required to
control a majority of a given network. Nevertheless, it is theoretically possible, albeit computationally expensive, to mount a similar
51% attack on bitcoin or other digital assets with large market capitalization. If the feasibility of a bad actor gaining control of the
processing power on the Bitcoin network increases, there may be a negative effect on an investment in the Trust.

 A malicious actor may also
obtain control over the Bitcoin network through its influence over core developers by gaining direct control over a core developer or
an otherwise influential programmer. To the extent that users and miners accept amendments to the source code proposed by the controlled
core developer, other core developers do not counter such amendments, and such amendments enable the malicious exploitation of the Bitcoin
network, the risk that a malicious actor may be able to obtain control of the Bitcoin network in this manner exists, which may adversely
affect the value of the Shares.

 To the extent that the Bitcoin
ecosystem, including the core developers and the administrators of mining pools, does not act to ensure greater decentralization of mining
processing power, the feasibility of a malicious actor obtaining control of the processing power on the Bitcoin network will increase,
which may adversely affect the value of the Shares.

 If any of these exploitations
or attacks occur, it could result in a loss of public confidence in bitcoin and a decline in the value of bitcoin and, as a result, adversely
impact an investment in the Shares.

 If miners expend less
processing power on the Bitcoin network, it could increase the likelihood of a malicious actor obtaining control.

 Miners ceasing operations
would reduce the collective processing power on the Bitcoin network, which would adversely affect the confirmation process for transactions
(i.e., temporarily decreasing the speed at which blocks are added to the Bitcoin blockchain until the next scheduled adjustment in difficulty
for block solutions). If a reduction in processing power occurs, the Bitcoin network may be more vulnerable to a malicious actor obtaining
control in excess of fifty percent (50%) of the processing power on the Bitcoin network. As a result, it may be possible for a bad actor
to manipulate the Bitcoin network and hinder transactions. Any reduction in confidence in the confirmation process or processing power
of the Bitcoin network may adversely affect an investment in the Trust.

 Cancer nodes.

 Cancer nodes are computers
that appear to be participating in the Bitcoin network but that are not in fact connected to the network, which a malicious actor sets
up to place users onto a separate network or disconnect them from the Bitcoin network. By using cancer nodes, a malicious actor can disconnect
the target user from the bitcoin economy entirely by refusing to relay any blocks or transactions.

 Double-spending risks.

 A malicious actor may attempt
to double spend bitcoin (i.e., allow for the same units of bitcoin to be spent on multiple occasions) by altering the formation of the
blockchain, where the malicious actor has enough network control to confirm and post such transactions to the blockchain. In a double
spending situation, the related record of the transaction, posted on the Bitcoin network, would become falsified. This could have a detrimental
effect on both the sender and the receiver.

 There are several ways a malicious
actor could attempt a double-spend, including, but not limited to, sending two conflicting transactions to the network, and creating one
transaction but sending the bitcoin before releasing that associated block to the blockchain, which would invalidate it. On an exchange
with multiple currency trading pairs, it would be possible for a person or individual controlling the majority of a blockchain network
to double-spend the coins they control and then subsequently trade them for other currency pairs and transfer them off the exchange to
their own private wallet(s).

 All double-spend attacks require
that the miner sequence and execute the steps of its attack with sufficient speed and accuracy. Double-spend attacks require extensive
coordination and are very expensive. Typically, transactions that allow for a zero-confirmation acceptance tend to be prone to these types
of attacks. Accordingly, traders and merchants may execute instantaneous/zero-confirmation transactions only if they are of sufficiently
low-value. Users and merchants can take additional precautions by adjusting their network software programs to connect only to other well-connected
participants in the Bitcoin network and to disable incoming connections. Tactics to avoid double-spend such as requiring multiple confirmations
can slow down transaction speeds on the Bitcoin network and could impact the value of bitcoin.

 Flaws in source code.

 It is possible that flaws
or mistakes in the released and public source code could lead to catastrophic damage to bitcoin, the Bitcoin network, and any underlying
technology. It is possible that contributors to the Bitcoin network would be unable to stop this damage before it spreads further. It
is further possible that a dedicated team or a group of contributors or other technical group may attack the code, directly leading to
catastrophic damage. In any of these situations, the value of Shares of the Trust can be adversely affected.

 In the past, flaws in the
source code for digital asset networks have been exposed and exploited, including flaws that disabled some functionality for users, exposed
users' personal information and/or resulted in the theft of users' digital assets. Several errors and defects have been publicly
found and corrected, including those that disabled some functionality for users and exposed users' personal information. Discovery
of flaws in or exploitations of the source code that allow malicious actors to take or create money in contravention of known network
rules have occurred. The cryptography underlying bitcoin could prove to be flawed or ineffective, or negatively impacted by developments
in mathematics and/or technology, such as advances in digital computing, algebraic geometry and quantum computing. In any of these circumstances,
a malicious actor may be able to steal bitcoin held by others, which could adversely affect the demand for bitcoin and therefore adversely
impact the price of bitcoin and the value of the Shares. Even if another digital asset other than bitcoin were affected by similar circumstances,
any reduction in confidence in the robustness of the source code or cryptography underlying digital assets generally could negatively
affect the demand for all digital assets, including bitcoin, and therefore adversely affect the value of the Shares.

 Mathematical or technological
advances could undermine the Bitcoin network's consensus mechanism.

 The Bitcoin network is premised
on multiple persons competing to solve cryptographic puzzles quickly. It is possible that mathematical or technological advances, such
as the development of quantum computers with significantly more power than computers presently available, could undermine or vitiate the
cryptographic consensus mechanism underpinning the Bitcoin network.

 The Bitcoin network
faces scaling challenges and efforts to increase the volume of transactions may not be successful.

 Many digital asset networks
face significant scaling challenges due to the fact that public blockchains generally face a trade-off between security and scalability.

 As of July 2017, bitcoin could
handle, on average, five to seven transactions per second. For several years, participants in the Bitcoin ecosystem debated potential
approaches to increasing the average number of transactions per second that the Bitcoin network could handle. As of August 2017, the Bitcoin
network was upgraded with a technical feature known as "segregated witness" that, among other things, could potentially approximately
double the transactions per second that can be handled on-chain. More importantly, segregated witness also enables so-called second layer
solutions, such as the Lightning Network or payment channels, which could potentially allow faster transaction settlement.

 An increasing number of wallets
and digital asset intermediaries, such as bitcoin spot markets, have begun supporting segregated witness and the Lightning Network, or
similar technology. The Lightning Network is an open-source decentralized network that enables instant off-Bitcoin blockchain transfers
of the ownership of bitcoin without the need of a trusted third party. The system utilizes bidirectional payment channels that consist
of multi-signature addresses. One on-blockchain transaction is needed to open a channel and another on-blockchain transaction can close
the channel. Once a channel is open, value can be transferred instantly between counterparties, who are engaging in real bitcoin transactions
without broadcasting them to the Bitcoin network. New transactions will replace previous transactions and the counterparties will store
everything locally as long as the channel stays open to increase transaction throughput and reduce computational burden on the Bitcoin
network.

 As the use of digital asset
networks increases without a corresponding increase in transaction processing speed of the networks, average fees and settlement times
can increase significantly. Bitcoin's network has been, at times, at capacity, which has led to increased transaction fees. Since
January 1, 2019, bitcoin transaction fees have increased from $0.18 per-bitcoin transaction, on average, to a high of $60.95 per transaction,
on average, on April 20, 2021. As of December 31, 2023, bitcoin transaction fees were $4.45 per transaction, on average, over a one-year
trailing basis.

 Increased fees and decreased
settlement speeds could preclude certain use cases for bitcoin (e.g., micropayments), and can reduce demand for and the price of bitcoin,
which could adversely impact the value of the Shares. There is no guarantee that any of the mechanisms in place or being explored for
increasing the scale of settlement of transactions in bitcoin will be effective, or how long these mechanisms will take to become effective,
which could adversely impact an investment in the Shares.

 New competing digital
assets may pose a challenge to bitcoin's current market position, resulting in a reduction in demand for bitcoin, which could have
a negative impact on the price of bitcoin and may have a negative impact on the performance of the Trust.

 Bitcoin faces significant
competition from other digital assets, as well as from other technologies or payment forms, such as Swift, ACH, remittance networks, credit
cards and cash. There is no guarantee that bitcoin will become a dominant form of payments, store of value or method of exchange.

 The Bitcoin network and bitcoin,
as an asset, hold a "first-to-market" advantage over other digital assets. This first-to-market advantage has resulted in
the Bitcoin network evolving into the most well-developed network of any digital asset. The Bitcoin network enjoys the largest user base
and has more mining power in use to secure the Bitcoin network than any other digital asset. However, despite the first-mover advantage
of the Bitcoin network over other digital assets, it is possible that real or perceived shortcomings in the Bitcoin network, or technological,
regulatory or other developments, could result in a decline in popularity and acceptance of bitcoin and the Bitcoin network, and other
digital currencies and trading systems could become more widely accepted and used than the Bitcoin network. Bitcoin is one of the few
virtual currencies in which there are strong arguments that bitcoin is not a "security" under the federal securities laws.
See Risk Factors—Future legal or regulatory developments may negatively affect the value of bitcoin or require the Trust or the
Sponsor to become registered with the SEC or CFTC, which may cause the Trust to incur unforeseen expenses or liquidate. Regulatory changes
or guidance that result in other virtual currencies not meeting the definition of "security" will reduce advantages associated
with bitcoin's current regulatory status, which could adversely impact an investment in the Shares. Promoters of other digital assets
claim that those digital assets have solved certain of the purported drawbacks of the Bitcoin network, for example, allowing faster settlement
times, reducing mining fees, or reducing electricity usage in connection with mining. If these digital assets are successful, such success
could reduce demand for bitcoin and adversely affect the value of bitcoin and an investment in the Trust. It is currently unclear which
digital assets, if any, will become and remain dominant, as the sector continues to innovate and evolve. Changes in the viability of any
digital asset ecosystem may adversely impact pricing and liquidity of bitcoin and, therefore, of the Trust.

 Competition from central
bank digital currencies ("CBDCs") could adversely affect the value of bitcoin and other digital assets.

 Central banks have introduced
digital forms of legal tender. China's CBDC project, known as Digital Currency Electronic Payment, has reportedly been tested in
a live pilot program conducted in multiple cities in China. A recent study published by the Bank for International Settlements estimated
that at least 36 central banks have published retail or wholesale CBDC work ranging from research to pilot projects. Whether or not they
incorporate blockchain or similar technology, CBDCs, as legal tender in the issuing jurisdiction, could have an advantage in competing
with, or replacing, bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as a medium of exchange or store of value. Central banks and other governmental
entities have also announced cooperative initiatives and consortia with private sector entities, with the goal of leveraging blockchain
and other technology to reduce friction in cross-border and interbank payments and settlement, and commercial banks and other financial
institutions have also recently announced a number of initiatives of their own to incorporate new technologies, including blockchain and
similar technologies, into their payments and settlement activities, which could compete with, or reduce the demand for, bitcoin. As a
result of any of the foregoing factors, the value of bitcoin could decrease, which could adversely affect an investment in the Trust.

 Prices of bitcoin may
be affected due to stablecoins, the activities of stablecoin issuers and their regulatory treatment.

 While the Trust does not invest
in stablecoins, it may nonetheless be exposed to these and other risks that stablecoins pose for the bitcoin market through its investment
in bitcoin. Stablecoins are digital assets designed to have a stable value over time as compared to typically volatile digital assets
and are typically marketed as being pegged to a fiat currency, such as the U.S. dollar. Although the prices of stablecoins are intended
to be stable, in many cases their prices fluctuate, sometimes significantly. This volatility has in the past apparently impacted the price
of bitcoin. Stablecoins are a relatively new phenomenon, and it is impossible to know all of the risks that they could pose to participants
in the bitcoin market. In addition, some have argued that some stablecoins, particularly Tether, are improperly issued without sufficient
backing in a way that could cause artificial rather than genuine demand for bitcoin, raising its price, and also argue that those associated
with certain stablecoins are involved in laundering money. On February 17, 2021, the New York Attorney General entered an agreement with
Tether's operators, requiring them to cease any further trading activity with New York persons and pay $18.5 million in penalties
for false and misleading statements made regarding the assets backing Tether. On October 15, 2021, the CFTC announced a settlement with
Tether's operators in which they agreed to pay $42.5 million in fines to settle charges that, among others, Tether's claims
that it maintained sufficient U.S. dollar reserves to back every Tether stablecoin in circulation with the "equivalent amount of
corresponding fiat currency" held by Tether were untrue.

 Stablecoins are reliant on
the U.S. banking system and U.S. treasuries, and the failure of either to function normally could impede the function of stablecoins,
and therefore could adversely affect the value of the Shares.

 Given the role that stablecoins
play in global digital asset markets, their fundamental liquidity can have a dramatic impact on the broader digital asset market, including
the market for bitcoin.

 Volatility in stablecoins,
operational issues with stablecoins (for example, technical issues that prevent settlement), concerns about the sufficiency of any reserves
that support stablecoins, or regulatory concerns about stablecoin issuers or intermediaries, such as bitcoin spot markets, that support
stablecoins, could impact individuals' willingness to trade on trading venues that rely on stablecoins and could impact the price
of bitcoin, and in turn, an investment in the Shares.

 Operational cost may
exceed the award for solving blocks or transaction fees. Increased transaction fees may adversely affect the usage of the Bitcoin network.

 Miners generate revenue from
both newly created bitcoin (known as the "block reward") and from fees taken upon verification of transactions. If the aggregate
revenue from transaction fees and the block reward is below a miner's cost, the miner may cease operations. Additionally, in the
event of a fork of the Bitcoin network, some miners may choose to mine the alternative new bitcoin resulting from the fork, thus reducing
processing power on the original blockchain.

 Furthermore, the incentives
for miners to contribute processing power to the Bitcoin network is set to decrease over time. As a result of the Bitcoin network's
"halving" mechanism, the block reward that miners receive for successfully mining a block are cut in half each time the Bitcoin
network mines 210,000 blocks. This type of "halving" event generally occurs once every four years and will continue until
the maximum possible 21 million bitcoin have been mined and released into circulation. Currently, there are approximately 19 million bitcoin
that have been mined and are in circulation.

 Once new bitcoin tokens are
no longer awarded for adding a new block, miners will only have transaction fees to incentivize them, and as a result, it is expected
that miners will need to be better compensated with higher transaction fees to ensure that there is adequate incentive for them to continue
mining.

 If transaction confirmation
fees become too high, the marketplace may be reluctant to use bitcoin. This may result in decreased usage and limit expansion of the Bitcoin
network in the retail, commercial and payments space, adversely impacting investment in the Trust. Conversely, if the reward for miners
or the value of the transaction fees is insufficient to motivate miners, they may cease expending processing power for any blockchain
to solve blocks and confirm transactions.

 Ultimately, if the awards
of new bitcoin for solving blocks declines and transaction fees for recording transactions are not sufficiently high to incentivize miners,
or if the costs of validating transactions grow disproportionately, miners may operate at a loss, transition to other networks, or cease
operations altogether. Each of these outcomes could, in turn, slow transaction validation and usage, which could have a negative impact
on the Bitcoin network and could adversely affect the value of the bitcoin held by the Trust.

 An acute cessation of mining
operations would reduce the collective processing power on the Bitcoin network, which would adversely affect the transaction verification
process by temporarily decreasing the speed at which blocks are added to the blockchain and make the blockchain more vulnerable to a malicious
actor obtaining control in excess of 50% of the processing power on the blockchain. Reductions in processing power could result in material,
though temporary, delays in transaction confirmation time. Any reduction in confidence in the transaction verification process or mining
processing power may adversely impact the value of Shares of the Trust or the ability of the Sponsor to operate.

 Electricity usage.

 Bitcoin uses a system called
proof-of-work to validate transaction information. It's called proof-of-work because solving the encrypted hash takes time and energy,
which acts as proof that work was done. Proof-of-stake cryptocurrencies allow people to pledge or lock up some of their holdings as a
way of vouching for the accuracy of newly added information. Meanwhile, proof-of-work cryptocurrencies require people to solve complex
cryptographic puzzles — which can incur significant energy costs — before they're allowed to propose a new block. Proof
of work requires users to mine or complete complex computational puzzles before submitting new transactions to the network. This expenditure
of time, computing power and energy is intended to make the cost of fraud higher than the potential rewards of a dishonest action.

 Anyone that owns the specific
proof-of-stake cryptocurrency can participate in staking, subject to certain minimum amounts as determined by the applicable proof-of-stake
cryptocurrency. Generally, the higher the amount staked by any actor, the higher the chances of being chosen by the applicable blockchain
to act as validator and reaping validator rewards; in other words, the higher the stake, the higher the chances of earning a staking reward.
This has led to the creation of staking pools, where third parties combine smaller stakes into large pools, which leads to higher returns
for owners of small stakes, in return for a fee collected by the third parties.

 Digital asset mining operations
can consume significant amounts of electricity, which may have a negative environmental impact and give rise to public opinion against
allowing, or government regulations restricting, the use of electricity for mining operations. Additionally, miners may be forced to cease
operations during an electricity shortage or power outage, or if electricity prices increase where the mining activities are performed.
This could adversely affect the price of bitcoin, or the operation of the Bitcoin network, and accordingly decrease the value of the Shares.

 Concerns have been raised
about the electricity required to secure and maintain digital asset networks. For example, as of December 31, 2023, approximately 558
million tera hashes are performed every second in connection with mining on the Bitcoin network. Although measuring the electricity consumed
by this process is difficult because these operations are performed by various machines with varying levels of efficiency, the process
consumes a significant amount of energy. The operations of the Bitcoin network and other digital asset networks may also consume significant
amounts of energy. Further, in addition to the direct energy costs of performing calculations on any given digital asset network, there
are indirect costs that impact a network's total energy consumption, including the costs of cooling the machines that perform these
calculations.

 Driven by concerns around
energy consumption and the impact on public utility companies, various states and cities have implemented, or are considering implementing,
moratoriums on mining activity in their jurisdictions. A significant reduction in mining activity as a result of such actions could adversely
affect the security of the Bitcoin network by making it easier for a malicious actor or botnet to manipulate the relevant blockchain.
If regulators or public utilities take action that restricts or otherwise impacts mining activities, such actions could result in decreased
security of a digital asset network, including the Bitcoin network, and consequently adversely impact the value of the Shares.

 Miners could act in
collusion to raise transaction fees, which may adversely affect the usage of the Bitcoin network.

 Bitcoin miners collect fees
for each transaction they confirm. Miners validate unconfirmed transactions by adding the previously unconfirmed transactions to new blocks
in the blockchain. Miners are not forced to confirm any specific transaction, but they are economically incentivized to confirm valid
transactions as a means of collecting fees. To the extent that any miners cease to record transactions in solved blocks, such transactions
will not be recorded on the Bitcoin network until a block is solved by a miner who does not require the payment of transaction fees. Miners
have historically accepted relatively low transaction confirmation fees, because miners have a very low marginal cost of validating unconfirmed
transactions. If miners collude in an anticompetitive manner to reject low transaction fees, then bitcoin users could be forced to pay
higher fees, thus reducing the attractiveness of the Bitcoin network, or to wait longer times for their transactions to be validated by
a miner who does not require the payment of a transaction fee. Bitcoin mining occurs globally, and it may be difficult for authorities
to apply antitrust regulations across multiple jurisdictions. Any collusion among miners may adversely impact an investment in the Trust
or the ability of the Trust to operate.

 As technology advances,
miners may be unable to acquire the digital asset mining hardware necessary to develop and launch their operations. A decline in the bitcoin
mining population could adversely affect the Bitcoin network and an investment in the Trust.

 Due to the increasing demand
for digital asset mining hardware, miners may be unable to acquire the proper mining equipment or suitable amounts of equipment necessary
to continue their operations or develop and launch their operations. In addition, because successful mining of a digital asset that uses
"proof of work" validation requires maintaining or exceeding a certain level of computing power relative to other validators,
miners will need to upgrade their mining hardware periodically to keep up with their competition. The development of supercomputers with
disproportionate computing power may threaten the integrity of the bitcoin market by concentrating mining power, which would make it unprofitable
for other miners to mine. The expense of purchasing or upgrading new equipment may be substantial and diminish returns to miners dramatically.
A decline in miners may result in a decrease in the value of bitcoin and the value of the Trust.

 If profit margins of
bitcoin mining operations are not high, miners may elect to immediately sell bitcoin earned by mining, resulting in a reduction in the
price of bitcoin that could adversely affect an investment in the Trust.

 Bitcoin network mining operations
have rapidly evolved over the past several years from individual users mining with computer processors, graphics processing units and
first-generation ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit) machines. New processing power is predominantly added to the Bitcoin network
currently by "professionalized" mining operations. Such operations may use proprietary hardware or sophisticated ASIC machines
acquired from ASIC manufacturers. Significant capital is necessary for mining operations to acquire this hardware, lease operating space
(often in data centers or warehousing facilities), afford electricity costs and employ technicians to operate the mining farms. As a result,
professionalized mining operations are of a greater scale than prior Bitcoin network validators and have more defined, regular expenses
and liabilities. In past years, individual miners are believed to have been more likely to hold newly mined bitcoin for extended periods.

 A professional mining operation
operating at a low profit margin may be more likely to sell a higher percentage of its newly mined bitcoin rapidly, and it may partially
or completely cease operations if its profit margin is negative. In a low profit margin environment, a higher percentage of the new bitcoin
mined each day will be sold into the bitcoin market more rapidly, thereby reducing bitcoin prices. The network effect of reduced profit
margins resulting in greater sales of newly mined bitcoin could result in a reduction in the price of bitcoin that could adversely affect
an investment in the Trust.

 Large-Scale Sales or
Distributions.

 Some entities hold large amounts
of bitcoin relative to other market participants, and to the extent such entities engage in large-scale hedging, sales or distributions
on non-market terms, or sales in the ordinary course, it could result in a reduction in the price of bitcoin and adversely affect the
value of the Shares. Additionally, political or economic crises may motivate large-scale acquisitions or sales of digital assets, including
bitcoin, either globally or locally. Such large-scale sales or distributions could result in selling pressure that may reduce the price
of bitcoin and adversely affect an investment in the Shares.

 As of the date of this report,
the largest 100 bitcoin wallets held a substantial amount of the outstanding supply of bitcoin, and it is possible that some of these
wallets are controlled by the same person or entity. Moreover, it is possible that other persons or entities control multiple wallets
that collectively hold a significant number of bitcoin, even if each wallet individually only holds a small amount. As a result of this
concentration of ownership, large sales by such holders could have an adverse effect on the market price of bitcoin.

 Congestion or delay
in the Bitcoin network may delay purchases or sales of bitcoin by the Trust.

 The size of each block on
the Bitcoin blockchain is currently limited and is significantly below the level that centralized systems can provide. Increased transaction
volume could result in delays in the recording of transactions due to congestion in the Bitcoin network. Moreover, unforeseen system failures,
disruptions in operations, or poor connectivity may also result in delays in the recording of transactions on the Bitcoin network. Any
delay in the Bitcoin network could affect the Authorized Participant's ability to buy or sell bitcoin at an advantageous price resulting
in decreased confidence in the Bitcoin network. Over the longer term, delays in confirming transactions could reduce the attractiveness
to merchants and other commercial parties as a means of payment. As a result, the Bitcoin network and the value of the Trust's Shares
would be adversely affected.

 Risks Associated with Investing in the Trust

 Investment Related Risks.

 Investing in bitcoin and,
consequently, the Trust, is speculative. The price of bitcoin is volatile, and market movements of bitcoin are difficult to predict. Supply
and demand changes rapidly and is affected by a variety of factors, including regulation and general economic trends, such as interest
rates, availability of credit, credit defaults, inflation rates and economic uncertainty. All investments made by the Trust will risk
the loss of capital. Therefore, an investment in the Trust involves a high degree of risk, including the risk that the entire amount invested
may be lost. No guarantee or representation is made that the Trust's investment program will be successful, that the Trust will
achieve its investment objective or that there will be any return of capital invested to investors in the Trust, and investment results
may vary.

 The NAV or the Principal Market
NAV may not always correspond to the market price of bitcoin.

 The NAV or the Principal Market
NAV of the Trust will change as fluctuations occur in the market price of the Trust's bitcoin holdings. Shareholders should be aware
that the public trading price per share may be different from the NAV for a number of reasons, including price volatility and the fact
that supply and demand forces at work in the secondary trading market for shares are related, but not identical, to the supply and demand
forces influencing the market price of bitcoin as reflected in the Index.

 An Authorized Participant
may be able to create or redeem a Basket at a discount or a premium to the public trading price per share, and the Trust will therefore
maintain its intended fractional exposure to a specific amount of bitcoin per share.

 Deviations between the
Trust's NAV and NAV per Share versus the Trust's Principal Market NAV and Principal Market NAV per Share may occur.

 The Trust uses the Index to
determine its NAV and NAV per Share. However, for financial statement purposes, the Trust's bitcoin is carried at fair value as
required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), which requires a determination based on the price of bitcoin
on principal market as identified by the Trust as set for in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards
Codification ("ASC") 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASC 820-10"). See "Net Asset Value
Determinations" below. The Trust expects the applicable NAV and NAV per Share and corresponding Principal Market NAV and Principal
Market NAV to accurately reflect the price of bitcoin. However, deviations can occur between the prices from the principal market chosen
by the GAAP fair value methodology and Index, which takes into consideration prices from all of the markets used to calculate the Index.

 Different from directly
owning bitcoin.

 Investors should be aware
that the market value of Shares of the Trust may not have a direct relationship with the prevailing price of bitcoin, and changes in the
prevailing price of bitcoin similarly will not necessarily result in a comparable change in the market value of Shares of the Trust. The
performance of the Trust will not reflect the specific return an investor would realize if the investor actually held or purchased bitcoin
directly. The differences in performance may be due to factors such as fees, transaction costs, operating hours of the Exchange and index
tracking risk. Investors will also forgo certain rights conferred by owning bitcoin directly, such as the right to claim airdrops. See
"Risk Factors — The inability to recognize the economic benefit of a "fork" or an "airdrop" could
adversely impact an investment in the Trust."

 Index tracking risk.

 Although the Trust will attempt
to structure its portfolio so that investments track the Index, the Trust may not achieve the desired degree of correlation between its
performance and that of the Index and thus may not achieve its investment objective. The difference in performance may be due to factors
such as fees, transaction costs, redemptions of, and subscriptions for, Shares, pricing differences or the cost to the Trust of complying
with various new or existing regulatory requirements.

 Liquidity risk

 The ability of the Trust or
a Bitcoin Counterparty to buy or sell bitcoin may be adversely affected by limited trading volume, lack of a market maker in the digital
asset markets, or legal restrictions. It is also possible that a bitcoin spot market or governmental authority may suspend or restrict
trading in bitcoin altogether. Therefore, it may not always be possible to execute a buy or sell order at the desired price or to liquidate
an open position due to market conditions on spot markets, regulatory issues affecting bitcoin or other issues affecting counterparties.
Bitcoin is a new asset with a very limited trading history. Therefore, the markets for bitcoin may be less liquid and more volatile than
other markets for more established products.

 Shares of the Trust are intended
to be listed and traded on the Exchange. There is no certainty that there will be liquidity available on the Exchange or that the market
price will be in line with the NAV or the Principal Market NAV at any given time. There is also no guarantee that once the Shares of the
Trust are listed or traded on the Exchange that they will remain so listed or traded.

 If demand for Shares of the
Trust exceeds the availability of bitcoin from exchanges and the Trust is not able to secure additional supply, Shares of the Trust may
trade at a premium to their underlying value. Investors who pay a premium risk losing such premium if demand for the Shares of the Trust
abates or the Sponsor is able to source more bitcoin. In such circumstances, Shares of the Trust could also trade at a discount.

 Prior to their issuance, there
was no public market for Shares of the Trust.

 Counterparty Risk

 The Sponsor, Trust, Bitcoin
Counterparty, and Authorized Participants are subject to counterparty risk. A Bitcoin Counterparty may fail to deliver to the Trust's
account at the Bitcoin Custodian the amount of bitcoin associated with a creation order, a Bitcoin Counterparty may fail to deliver to
the Trust's account at the Cash Custodian the amount of cash associated with a redemption order, or the Cash Custodian may fail
to deliver to the Authorized Participant at settlement the cash proceeds from the sale of bitcoin associated with a redemption order.

 The value of the Shares
may be influenced by a variety of factors unrelated to the value of bitcoin.

 The value of the Shares may
be influenced by a variety of factors unrelated to the price of bitcoin and the bitcoin exchanges included in the Index that may have
an adverse effect on the price of the Shares. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following factors:

 Unanticipated problems or issues with respect to the mechanics
of the Trust's operations and the trading of the Shares may arise, in particular due to the fact that the mechanisms and procedures
governing the creation and offering of the Shares and storage of bitcoin have been developed specifically for this product;

 The Trust could experience difficulties in operating and maintaining its technical infrastructure, including
in connection with expansions or updates to such infrastructure, which are likely to be complex and could lead to unanticipated delays,
unforeseen expenses and security vulnerabilities;

 The Trust could experience unforeseen issues relating to the performance and effectiveness of the security
procedures used to protect the Trust's account with the Bitcoin Custodian, or the security procedures may not protect against all
errors, software flaws or other vulnerabilities in the Trust's technical infrastructure, which could result in theft, loss or damage
of its assets; or

 Service providers may decide to terminate their relationships with the Trust due to concerns that the
introduction of privacy enhancing features to the Bitcoin network may increase the potential for bitcoin to be used to facilitate crime,
exposing such service providers to potential reputational harm.

 Any of these factors could
affect the value of the Shares, either directly or indirectly through their effect on the Trust's assets.

 The Administrator is
solely responsible for determining the value of the Trust's bitcoin, the Trust's NAV and the Trust's Principal Market
NAV. The value of the Shares may experience an adverse effect in the event of any errors, discontinuance or changes in such valuation
calculations.

 The Administrator will determine
the Trust's NAV and the Trust's Principal Market NAV. The Administrator's determination is made utilizing data from
the Bitcoin Custodian's operations and the Index (in the case of the NAV) and the principal market for bitcoin as determined by
the Trust (in the case of the Principal Market NAV). To the extent that the Trust's NAV or the Principal Market NAV are incorrectly
calculated, the Administrator may not be liable for any error and such misreporting of valuation data could adversely affect an investment
in the Shares.

 The Administrator determines
the NAV of the Trust as of 4:00 p.m. ET, on each Business Day, as soon as practicable after that time and determines the Principal Market
NAV as of 4:00 p.m. ET, on the valuation date. If the Index is not available, or if the Sponsor determines in good faith that the Index
does not reflect an accurate bitcoin price, then the Administrator will determine NAV by reference to the Trust's principal market.
There are no predefined criteria to make a good faith assessment as to which of the rules the Sponsor will apply, and the Sponsor may
make this determination in its sole discretion.

 The Trust is subject to the
risk that the Administrator may calculate the Index in a manner that ultimately inaccurately reflects the price of bitcoin. To the extent
that the NAV, Principal Market NAV, the Index, the Administrator's or the Sponsor's other valuation methodology are incorrectly
calculated, neither the Sponsor, the Administrator nor the Trustee will be liable for any error and such misreporting of valuation data
could adversely affect the value of the Shares and investors could suffer a substantial loss on their investment in the Trust. Moreover,
the terms of the Trust Agreement do not prohibit the Sponsor from changing the Index or other valuation method used to calculate the NAV
and Principal Market NAV of the Trust. Any such change in the Index or other valuation method could affect the value of the Shares and
investors could suffer a substantial loss on their investment in the Trust.

 Bitcoin Counterparties'
buying and selling activity associated with the creation and redemption of Baskets may adversely affect an investment in the Shares.

 The purchase of bitcoin in
connection with Basket creation orders may cause the price of bitcoin to increase, which will result in higher prices for the Shares.
Increases in the bitcoin prices may also occur as a result of bitcoin purchases by other market participants who attempt to benefit from
an increase in the market price of bitcoin when Baskets are created. The market price of bitcoin may therefore decline immediately after
Baskets are created.

 Selling activity associated
with sales of bitcoin in connection with redemption orders may decrease the bitcoin prices, which will result in lower prices for the
Shares. Decreases in bitcoin prices may also occur as a result of selling activity by other market participants.

 In addition to the effect
that purchases and sales of bitcoin as part of the creation and redemption process may have on the price of bitcoin, sales and purchases
of bitcoin by similar investment vehicles (if developed) could impact the price of bitcoin. If the price of bitcoin declines, the trading
price of the Shares will generally also decline.

 The inability of Bitcoin
Counterparties to hedge their bitcoin exposure may adversely affect the liquidity of Shares and the value of an investment in the Shares.

 Authorized Participants and
market makers will generally want to hedge their exposure in connection with Basket creation and redemption orders. To the extent Authorized
Participants and market makers are unable to hedge their exposure due to market conditions (e.g., insufficient bitcoin liquidity in the
market, inability to locate an appropriate hedge counterparty, etc.), such conditions may make it difficult for Authorized Participants
to create or redeem Baskets (or cause them to not create or redeem Baskets). In addition, the hedging mechanisms employed by Bitcoin Counterparties
to hedge their exposure to bitcoin may not function as intended, which may make it more difficult for them to enter into such transactions.
Such events could negatively impact the market price of Shares and the spread at which Shares trade on the open market. To the extent
Bitcoin Counterparties wish to use futures to hedge their exposure, note that while growing in recent years, the market for exchange-traded
bitcoin futures has a limited trading history and operational experience and may be less liquid, more volatile and more vulnerable to
economic, market and industry changes than more established futures markets. The liquidity of the market will depend on, among other things,
the adoption of bitcoin and the commercial and speculative interest in the market.

 Arbitrage transactions
intended to keep the price of Shares closely linked to the price of bitcoin may be problematic if the process for the creation and redemption
of Baskets encounters difficulties, which may adversely affect an investment in the Shares.

 If the processes of creation
and redemption of the Shares encounter any unanticipated difficulties, potential market participants who would otherwise be willing to
purchase or redeem Baskets to take advantage of any arbitrage opportunity arising from discrepancies between the price of the Shares and
the price of the underlying bitcoin may not take the risk that, as a result of those difficulties, they may not be able to realize the
profit they expect. If this is the case, the liquidity of Shares may decline, and the price of the Shares may fluctuate independently
of the price of bitcoin and may fall.

 Security threats and
cyber-attacks could result in the halting of Trust operations and a loss of Trust assets or damage to the reputation of the Trust, each
of which could result in a reduction in the price of the Shares.

 Security breaches, cyber-attacks,
computer malware and computer hacking attacks have been a prevalent concern in relation to digital assets. Multiple thefts of bitcoin
and other digital assets from other holders have occurred in the past. Because of the decentralized process for transferring bitcoin,
thefts can be difficult to trace, which may make bitcoin a particularly attractive target for theft. Cyber security failures or breaches
of one or more of the Trust's service providers (including but not limited to, the Index Provider, the Transfer Agent, the Administrator,
or the Bitcoin Custodian) have the ability to cause disruptions and impact business operations, potentially resulting in financial losses,
violations of applicable privacy and other laws, regulatory fines, penalties, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensation
costs, and/or additional compliance costs.

 The Trust and its service
providers' use of internet, technology and information systems (including mobile devices and cloud-based service offerings) may
expose the Trust to potential risks linked to cyber-security breaches of those technological or information systems. Security breaches,
computer malware, ransomware and computer hacking attacks have been a prevalent concern in relation to digital assets. The Sponsor believes
that the Trust's bitcoin held in the Trust's account with the Bitcoin Custodian will be an appealing target to hackers or
malware distributors seeking to destroy, damage or steal the Trust's bitcoin or private keys and will only become more appealing
as the Trust's assets grow. To the extent that the Trust, the Sponsor or the Bitcoin Custodian is unable to identify and mitigate
or stop new security threats or otherwise adapt to technological changes in the digital asset industry, the Trust's bitcoin may
be subject to theft, loss, destruction or other attack.

 The Sponsor has evaluated
the security procedures in place for safeguarding the Trust's bitcoin. Nevertheless, the security procedures cannot guarantee the
prevention of any loss due to a security breach, software defect or act of God that may be borne by the Trust. Access to the Trust's
bitcoin could be restricted by natural events (such as an earthquake or flood) or human actions (such as a terrorist attack).

 The security procedures and
operational infrastructure may be breached due to the actions of outside parties, error or malfeasance of an employee of the Sponsor,
the Sub-Adviser, the Bitcoin Custodian, or otherwise, and, as a result, an unauthorized party may obtain access to the Trust's account
with the Bitcoin Custodian, the private keys (and therefore bitcoin) or other data of the Trust. Additionally, outside parties may attempt
to fraudulently induce employees of the Sponsor, the Sub-Adviser, the Bitcoin Custodian, or the Trust's other service providers
to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to the Trust's infrastructure. As the techniques used to obtain unauthorized
access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently, or may be designed to remain dormant until a predetermined
event and often are not recognized until launched against a target, the Sponsor and the Bitcoin Custodian may be unable to anticipate
these techniques or implement adequate preventative measures.

 An actual or perceived breach
of the Trust's account with the Bitcoin Custodian could harm the Trust's operations, result in partial or total loss of the
Trust's assets, damage the Trust's reputation and negatively affect the market perception of the effectiveness of the Trust,
all of which could in turn reduce demand for the Shares, resulting in a reduction in the price of the Shares. The Trust may also cease
operations, the occurrence of which could similarly result in a reduction in the price of the Shares.

 While the Sponsor has established
business continuity plans and systems that it believes are reasonably designed to prevent cyber attacks, there are inherent limitations
in such plans and systems including the possibility that certain risks have not been, or cannot be, identified. Service providers may
have limited indemnification obligations to the Trust, which could be negatively impacted as a result.

 If the Trust's holdings
of bitcoin are lost, stolen or destroyed under circumstances rendering a party liable to the Trust, the responsible party may not have
the financial resources, including insurance coverage, sufficient to satisfy the Trust's claim. For example, as to a particular
event of loss, the only source of recovery for the Trust may be limited to the relevant custodian or, to the extent identifiable, other
responsible third parties (for example, a thief or terrorist), any of which may not have the financial resources (including liability
insurance coverage) to satisfy a valid claim of the Trust. Similarly, as noted below, the Trust's Bitcoin Custodian has extraordinarily
limited liability to the Trust, which will adversely affect the Trust's ability to seek recovery from them, even when they are at
fault.

 It may not be possible, either
because of a lack of available policies or because of prohibitive cost, for the Trust to obtain insurance that would cover losses of the
Trust's bitcoin. If an uninsured loss occurs or a loss exceeds policy limits, the Trust could lose all of its assets.

 The Trust's Bitcoin
Custodian could become insolvent.

 The Trust's assets will
be held in one or more accounts maintained for the Trust by the Bitcoin Custodian or at other custodian banks which may be located in
other jurisdictions. The Bitcoin Custodian is not a depository institution as it not insured by the FDIC. The insolvency of the Bitcoin
Custodian or of any broker, custodian bank or clearing corporation used by the Bitcoin Custodian, may result in the loss of all or a substantial
portion of the Trust's assets or in a significant delay in the Trust having access to those assets. Additionally, custody of digital
assets presents inherent and unique risks relating to access loss, theft and means of recourse in such scenarios. These risks are applicable
to the Trust's use of Coinbase Custody.

 The Trust may change the custodial
arrangements described in this report at any time without notice to Shareholders.

 The Trust is subject
to risks due to its concentration of investments in a single asset.

 Unlike other funds that may
invest in diversified assets, the Trust's investment strategy is concentrated in a single asset within a single asset class. This
concentration maximizes the degree of the Trust's exposure to a variety of market risks associated with bitcoin and digital assets.
By concentrating its investment strategy solely in bitcoin, any losses suffered as a result of a decrease in the value of bitcoin can
be expected to reduce the value of an interest in the Trust and will not be offset by other gains if the Trust were to invest in underlying
assets that were diversified.

 The lack of active trading
markets for the Shares may result in losses on Shareholders' investments at the time of disposition of Shares.

 Although Shares of the Trust
are expected to be publicly listed and traded on an exchange, there can be no guarantee that an active trading market for the Shares will
develop or be maintained. If Shareholders need to sell their Shares at a time when no active market for them exists, the price Shareholders
receive for their Shares, assuming that Shareholders are able to sell them, may be lower than the price that Shareholders would receive
if an active market did exist and, accordingly, a Shareholder may suffer losses.

 Several factors may
affect the Trust's ability to achieve its investment objective on a consistent basis.

 There can be no assurance
that the Trust will achieve its investment objective. Factors that may affect the Trust's ability to meet its investment objective
include: (1) The Trust's or a Bitcoin Counterparty's ability to purchase and sell bitcoin in an efficient manner to effectuate
creation and redemption orders; (2) transaction fees associated with the Bitcoin network; (3) the bitcoin market becoming illiquid or
disrupted; (4) the need to conform the Trust's portfolio holdings to comply with investment restrictions or policies or regulatory
or tax law requirements; (5) early or unanticipated closings of the markets on which bitcoin trades, resulting in the inability of Authorized
Participants to execute intended portfolio transactions; and (6) accounting standards.

 The amount of bitcoin
represented by the Shares will decline over time.

 The amount of bitcoin represented
by the Shares will continue to be reduced during the life of the Trust due to the transfer of the Trust's bitcoin to pay for the
Sponsor Fee and other liabilities.

 Each outstanding Share represents
a fractional, undivided interest in the bitcoin held by the Trust. The Trust does not generate any income and transfers bitcoin to pay
for the Sponsor Fee and other liabilities. Therefore, the amount of bitcoin represented by each Share will gradually decline over time.
This is also true with respect to Shares that are issued in exchange for additional bitcoin over time, as the amount of bitcoin required
to create Shares proportionally reflects the amount of bitcoin represented by the Shares outstanding at the time of such creation unit
being created. Assuming a constant bitcoin price, the trading price of the Shares is expected to gradually decline relative to the price
of bitcoin as the amount of bitcoin represented by the Shares gradually declines.

 Shareholders should be aware
that the gradual decline in the amount of bitcoin represented by the Shares will occur regardless of whether the trading price of the
Shares rises or falls in response to changes in the price of bitcoin.

 The development and
commercialization of the Trust is subject to competitive pressures.

 The Trust and the Sponsor
face competition with respect to the creation of competing products, such as exchange-traded products offering exposure to the spot bitcoin
market or other digital assets. If the SEC were to approve many or all of the currently pending applications for such exchange-traded
bitcoin products, many or all of such products, including the Trust, could fail to acquire substantial assets, initially or at all.

 The Sponsor's competitors
may have greater financial, technical and human resources than the Sponsor. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be effective
competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. The Trust's competitors may also
charge a substantially lower fee than the Sponsor Fee in order to achieve initial market acceptance and scale. Accordingly, the Sponsor's
competitors may commercialize a competing product more rapidly or effectively than the Sponsor is able to, which could adversely affect
the Sponsor's competitive position and the likelihood that the Trust will achieve initial market acceptance, and could have a detrimental
effect on the scale and sustainability of the Trust and the Sponsor's ability to generate meaningful revenues from the Trust.

 If the Trust fails to achieve
sufficient scale due to competition, the Sponsor may have difficulty raising sufficient revenue to cover the costs associated with launching
and maintaining the Trust, and such shortfalls could impact the Sponsor's ability to properly invest in robust ongoing operations
and controls of the Trust to minimize the risk of operating events, errors, or other forms of losses to the Shareholders. In addition,
the Trust may also fail to attract adequate liquidity in the secondary market due to such competition, resulting in a sub-standard number
of Authorized Participants willing to make a market in the Shares, which in turn could result in a significant premium or discount in
the Shares for extended periods and the Trust's failure to reflect the performance of the price of bitcoin.

 There can be no assurance
that the Trust will grow to or maintain an economically viable size. There is no guarantee that the Sponsor will maintain a commercial
advantage relative to competitors offering similar products. Whether or not the Trust and the Sponsor are successful in achieving the
intended scale for the Trust may be impacted by a range of factors, such as the Trust's timing in entering the market and its fee
structure relative to those of competitive products.

 A loss of confidence
or breach of the Bitcoin Custodian may adversely affect the Trust and the value of an investment in the Shares.

 Custody and security services
for the Trust's bitcoin are provided by Coinbase Custody, although the Trust may retain one or more additional custodians at a later
date. Bitcoin held by the Trust may be custodied or secured in different ways (for example, a portion of the Trust's bitcoin holdings
may be custodied by Coinbase Custody and another portion by another third-party custodian). Over time, the Trust may change the custody
or security arrangement for all or a portion of its holdings. The Sponsor will decide the appropriate custody and arrangements based on,
among other factors, the availability of experienced custodians and the Trust's ability to securely safeguard the bitcoin.

 The Trust expects Coinbase
Custody will custody most or all of its bitcoin holdings. A loss of confidence or breach of the Bitcoin Custodian may adversely affect
the Trust and the value of an investment in the Shares.

 The Sponsor may need
to find and appoint a replacement bitcoin custodian or prime broker quickly, which could pose a challenge to the safekeeping of the Trust's
bitcoin.

 The Sponsor could decide to
replace the Bitcoin Custodian as the Bitcoin Custodian of the Trust's bitcoin or the Prime Broker as the provider of prime brokerages
to the Trust. Transferring maintenance responsibilities of the Trust's accounts with the Bitcoin Custodian and the Prime Broker
to another party will likely be complex and could subject the Trust's bitcoin to the risk of loss during the transfer, which could
have a negative impact on the performance of the Shares or result in loss of the Trust's assets.

 The Sponsor may not be able
to find a party willing to serve as the Bitcoin Custodian under the same terms as the current Custodial Services Agreement, or as the
Prime Broker under the same terms as the current Prime Broker Agreement. To the extent that Sponsor is not able to find a suitable party
willing to serve as the Bitcoin Custodian or Prime Broker, as applicable, the Sponsor may be required to terminate the Trust and liquidate
the Trust's bitcoin. In addition, to the extent that the Sponsor finds a suitable party but must enter into a modified custodial
services agreement or prime broker agreement that costs more, the value of the Shares could be adversely affected.

 Lack of recourse.

 The Bitcoin Custodian has
limited liability, impairing the ability of the Trust to recover losses relating to its bitcoin and any recovery may be limited, even
in the event of fraud. In addition, the Bitcoin Custodian may not be liable for any delay in performance of any of its custodial obligations
by reason of any cause beyond its reasonable control, including force majeure events, war or terrorism, and may not be liable for any
system failure or third-party penetration of its systems. As a result, the recourse of the Trust to the Bitcoin Custodian may be limited.

 Under the Custodial Services
Agreement, the Bitcoin Custodian's liability is limited to the greater of (i) the market value of the Trust's bitcoin held
by the Bitcoin Custodian at the time the events giving rise to the liability occurred and (ii) the fair market value of the Trust's
bitcoin held by the Bitcoin Custodian at the time that the Bitcoin Custodian notifies the Sponsor or Trustee in writing, or the Sponsor
or the Trustee otherwise has actual knowledge of the events giving rise to the liability.

 Under the Trust Agreement,
the Trustee and the Sponsor will not be liable for any liability or expense incurred absent gross negligence or wilful misconduct on the
part of the Trustee or the Sponsor or breach by the Sponsor of the Trust Agreement, as they case may be. As a result, the recourse of
the Trust or the Shareholder to Trustee or the Sponsor may be limited.

 The Index Provider has limited
liability relating to the use of the Index, impairing the ability of the Trust to recover losses relating to its use of the Index. The
Index Provider does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or performance of the Index or the data included therein and shall have
no liability in connection with the Index or index calculation, errors, omissions or interruptions of the Index or any data included therein.
The Index could be calculated now or in the future in a way that adversely affects an investment in the Trust.

 The value of the Shares
will be adversely affected if the Trust is required to indemnify the Sponsor, the Sub-Adviser, the Trustee, the Administrator, the Transfer
Agent, the Bitcoin Custodian, or the Prime Broker.

 Each of the Sponsor, the Sub-Adviser,
the Trustee, the Administrator, the Transfer Agent, the Bitcoin Custodian, and the Prime Broker has a right to be indemnified by the Trust
for certain liabilities or expenses that it incurs without gross negligence, bad faith or wilful misconduct on its part. Therefore, the
Sponsor, the Sub-Adviser, the Trustee, the Administrator, the Transfer Agent, the Bitcoin Custodian, and the Prime Broker may require
that the assets of the Trust be sold in order to cover losses or liability suffered by it. Any sale of that kind would reduce the bitcoin
holdings of the Trust and the value of the Shares.

 Intellectual property
rights claims may adversely affect the Trust and the value of the Shares.

 The Sponsor is not aware of
any intellectual property rights claims that may prevent the Trust from operating and holding bitcoin. However, third parties may assert
intellectual property rights claims relating to the operation of the Trust and the mechanics instituted for the investment in, holding
of and transfer of bitcoin. Regardless of the merit of an intellectual property or other legal action, any legal expenses to defend or
payments to settle such claims would be extraordinary expenses that would be borne by the Trust through the sale or transfer of its bitcoin
and any threatened action that reduces confidence in long-term viability or the ability of end-users to hold and transfer bitcoin may
adversely affect the value of the Shares. Additionally, a meritorious intellectual property rights claim could prevent the Trust from
operating and force the Sponsor to terminate the Trust and liquidate its bitcoin. As a result, an intellectual property rights claim against
the Trust could adversely affect the value of the Shares.

 Unforeseeable risks.

 Bitcoin has gained commercial
acceptance only within recent years and, as a result, there is little data on its long-term investment potential. Additionally, due to
the rapidly evolving nature of the bitcoin market, including advancements in the underlying technology or advancements in competing technologies,
changes to bitcoin may expose investors in the Trust to additional risks which are impossible to predict.

 Risks Associated with the Index and Index
Pricing

 The Index has a limited
history.

 The Index was developed by
the Index Provider and has a limited performance history. Although the Index is based on materially the same methodology (except calculation
time) as the Index Provider's Bitcoin Reference Rate ("BRR"), which was first introduced in November 2016, the Index
itself has only been in operation since February 2022, and the Index has only featured its current roster of Constituent Exchanges since
May 2022. A longer history of actual performance through various economic and market conditions would provide greater and more reliable
information for an investor to assess the Index's performance. The Index Provider has substantial discretion at any time to change
the methodology used to calculate the Index, including the spot markets that contribute prices to the Trust's NAV. The Index Provider
does not have any obligation to take the needs of the Trust, the Trust's Shareholders, or anyone else into consideration in connection
with such changes. There is no guarantee that the methodology currently used in calculating the Index will appropriately track the price
of bitcoin in the future. The Index Provider has no obligation to take the needs of the Trust or the Shareholders into consideration in
determining, composing, or calculating the Index.

 Pricing sources used by the
Index are digital asset spot markets that facilitate the buying and selling of bitcoin and other digital assets. Although many pricing
sources refer to themselves as "exchanges," they are not registered with, or supervised by, the SEC or CFTC and do not meet
the regulatory standards of a national securities exchange or designated contract market. For these reasons, among others, purchases and
sales of bitcoin may be subject to temporary distortions or other disruptions due to various factors, including the lack of liquidity
in the markets and government regulation and intervention. These circumstances could affect the price of bitcoin used in Index calculations
and, therefore, could adversely affect the bitcoin price as reflected by the Index.

 The Index is based on various
inputs which include price data from various third-party bitcoin spot markets. The Index Provider does not guarantee the validity of any
of these inputs, which may be subject to technological error, manipulative activity, or fraudulent reporting from their initial source.

 Right to change index.

 The Sponsor, in its sole discretion, may cause the Trust to track (or price its portfolio based upon)
an index or standard other than the Index at any time, with prior notice to the Shareholders, if investment conditions change or the Sponsor
believes that another index or standard better aligns with the Trust's investment objective and strategy. The Sponsor may make this
decision for a number of reasons, including, but not limited to the following:

 Third parties may be able to purchase
and sell bitcoin on public or private markets not included among the Constituent Exchanges, and such transactions may take place at prices
materially higher or lower than the Index price.

 There may be variances in the
prices of bitcoin on the various Constituent Exchanges, including as a result of differences in fee structures or administrative procedures
on different Constituent Exchanges.

 The
 prices on each Constituent Exchange or pricing source may not be equal to the value of a
 bitcoin as represented by the Index.

 To the extent the Index price
differs materially from the actual prices available on a Constituent Exchange, or the global market price of bitcoin, the price of the
Shares may no longer track, whether temporarily or over time, the global market price of bitcoin, which could adversely affect an investment
in the Trust by reducing investors' confidence in the Shares' ability to track the market price of bitcoin.

 To
 the extent market prices differ materially from the Index price, investors may lose confidence
 in the Shares' ability to track the market price of bitcoin, which could adversely
 affect the value of the Shares.

 The Sponsor, however, is under
no obligation whatsoever to make such changes in any circumstance.

 Risks related to pricing.

 As set forth under "Net
Asset Value Determinations" below, the Trust's portfolio will be priced, including for purposes of determining the
NAV, based upon the Index. The price of bitcoin in U.S. Dollars or in other currencies available from other data sources may not be equal
to the prices used to calculate the NAV.

 The NAV or the Principal Market
NAV of the Trust will change as fluctuations occur in the market price of the Trust's bitcoin holdings as reflected in the Index.
Shareholders should be aware that the public trading price per Share may be different from the NAV and the Principal Market NAV for a
number of reasons, including price volatility, trading activity, the closing of bitcoin trading platforms due to fraud, failure, security
breaches or otherwise, and the fact that supply and demand forces at work in the secondary trading market for Shares are related, but
not identical, to the supply and demand forces influencing the market price of bitcoin.

 An Authorized Participant
may be able to create or redeem a Basket at a discount or a premium to the public trading price per Share and the Trust will therefore
maintain its intended fractional exposure to a specific amount of bitcoin per Share.

 Shareholders also should note
that the size of the Trust in terms of total bitcoin held may change substantially over time and as Baskets are created and redeemed.

 In the event that the value
of the Trust's bitcoin holdings or bitcoin holdings per Share is incorrectly calculated, neither the Sponsor nor the Administrator
will be liable for any error and such misreporting of valuation data could adversely affect the value of the Shares.

 Regulatory Risk

 There is a lack of consensus
regarding the regulation of digital assets, including bitcoin. Regulation of digital assets continues to evolve across different jurisdictions
worldwide, which may cause uncertainty and insecurity as to the legal and tax status of a given digital asset. As bitcoin and digital
assets have grown in both popularity and market size, the U.S. Congress and a number of U.S. federal and state agencies have been examining
the operations of digital asset networks, digital asset users and the digital asset spot market. Many of these state and federal agencies
have brought enforcement actions and issued advisories and rules relating to digital asset markets. Ongoing and future regulatory actions
with respect to digital assets generally or any single digital asset in particular may alter, perhaps to a materially adverse extent,
the nature of an investment in the Shares and/or the ability of the Trust to continue to operate.

 Recent events, including among
others the bankruptcy filings of FTX and its subsidiaries, Three Arrows Capital, Celsius Network, Voyager Digital, Genesis, BlockFi and
others, and other developments in the digital asset markets, have resulted in calls for heightened scrutiny and regulation of the digital
asset industry, with a specific focus on intermediaries such as digital asset exchanges, platforms, and custodians. Federal and state
legislatures and regulatory agencies may introduce and enact new laws and regulations to regulate crypto asset intermediaries, such as
digital asset exchanges and custodians. The March 2023 collapses of Silicon Valley Bank, Silvergate Bank, and Signature Bank, which in
some cases provided services to the digital assets industry, may amplify and/or accelerate these trends. On January 3, 2023, the federal
banking agencies issued a joint statement on crypto-asset risks to banking organizations following events which exposed vulnerabilities
in the crypto-asset sector, including the risk of fraud and scams, legal uncertainties, significant volatility, and contagion risk. Although
banking organizations are not prohibited from crypto-asset related activities, the agencies have expressed significant safety and soundness
concerns with business models that are concentrated in crypto-asset related activities or have concentrated exposures to the crypto-asset
sector.

 U.S. federal and state regulators,
as well as the White House, have issued reports and releases concerning crypto assets, including Bitcoin and crypto asset markets. Further,
in 2023 the House of Representatives formed two new subcommittees: the Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion Subcommittee
and the Commodity Markets, Digital Assets, and Rural Development Subcommittee, each of which were formed in part to analyse issues concerning
crypto assets and demonstrate a legislative intent to develop and consider the adoption of federal legislation designed to address the
perceived need for regulation of and concerns surrounding the crypto industry. However, the extent and content of any forthcoming laws
and regulations are not yet ascertainable with certainty, and it may not be ascertainable in the near future. A divided Congress makes
any prediction difficult. We cannot predict how these, and other related events, will affect us or the crypto asset business.

 In August 2021, the chair
of the SEC stated that he believed investors using digital asset trading platforms are not adequately protected, and that activities on
the platforms can implicate the securities laws, commodities laws and banking laws, raising a number of issues related to protecting investors
and consumers, guarding against illicit activity, and ensuring financial stability. The chair expressed a need for the SEC to have additional
authorities to prevent transactions, products, and platforms from "falling between regulatory cracks," as well as for more
resources to protect investors in "this growing and volatile sector." The chair called for federal legislation centering on
digital asset trading, lending, and decentralized finance ("DeFi") platforms, seeking "additional plenary authority"
to write rules for digital asset trading and lending. It is not possible to predict whether Congress will grant additional authorities
to the SEC or other regulators, what the nature of such additional authorities might be, how they might impact the ability of digital
asset markets to function or how any new regulations that may flow from such authorities might impact the value of digital assets generally
and bitcoin held by the Trust specifically. The consequences of increased federal regulation of digital assets and digital asset activities
could have a material adverse effect on the Trust and the Shares.

 The Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network ("FinCEN") requires any administrator or exchanger of convertible digital assets to register with FinCEN as a money
transmitter and comply with the anti-money laundering regulations applicable to money transmitters. In 2015, FinCEN assessed a $700,000
fine against a sponsor of a digital asset for violating several requirements of the BSA by acting as a money services business and selling
the digital asset without registering with FinCEN, and by failing to implement and maintain an adequate anti-money laundering program.
In 2017, FinCEN assessed a $110 million fine against BTC-e, a now defunct digital asset exchange, for similar violations. The requirement
that exchangers that do business in the U.S. register with FinCEN and comply with anti-money laundering regulations may increase the cost
of buying and selling bitcoin and therefore may adversely affect the price of bitcoin and an investment in the Shares. In a March 2018
letter from FinCEN's assistant secretary for legislative affairs to U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, the assistant secretary indicated that
under current law both the developers and the exchanges involved in the sale of tokens in an initial coin offering ("ICO")
may be required to register with FinCEN as money transmitters and comply with the anti-money laundering regulations applicable to money
transmitters.

 The Office of Foreign Assets
Control ("OFAC") of the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the "U.S. Treasury Department") has added digital currency
addresses to the list of Specially Designated Nationals whose assets are blocked, and with whom U.S. persons are generally prohibited
from dealing. Such actions by OFAC, or by similar organizations in other jurisdictions, may introduce uncertainty in the market as to
whether bitcoin that has been associated with such addresses in the past can be easily sold. This "tainted" bitcoin may trade
at a substantial discount to untainted bitcoin. Reduced fungibility in the bitcoin markets may reduce the liquidity of bitcoin and therefore
adversely affect their price.

 In February 2020, then-U.S.
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin stated that digital assets were a "crucial area" on which the U.S. Treasury Department has
spent significant time. Secretary Mnuchin announced that the U.S. Treasury Department is preparing significant new regulations governing
digital asset activities to address concerns regarding the potential use for facilitating money laundering and other illicit activities.
In December 2020, FinCEN, a bureau within the U.S. Treasury Department, proposed a rule that would require financial institutions to submit
reports, keep records, and verify the identity of customers for certain transactions to or from so-called "unhosted" wallets,
also commonly referred to as self-hosted wallets. In January 2021, U.S. Treasury Secretary nominee Janet Yellen stated her belief that
regulators should "look closely at how to encourage the use of digital assets for legitimate activities while curtailing their use
for malign and illegal activities."

 On February 15, 2022, Representative
Warren Davidson introduced the "Keep Your Coins Act," which is intended "[t]o prohibit Federal agencies from restricting
the use of convertible virtual currency by a person to purchase goods or services for the person's own use, and for other purposes."
That same day, Congressman Josh Gottheimer also announced a discussion draft of the "Stablecoin Innovation and Protection Act,"
which is intended to define "qualified stablecoins" to differentiate them from "more volatile cryptocurrencies."

 On March 17, 2022, Senators
Elizabeth Warren, Jack Reed, Mark Warner, and Jon Tester introduced the Digital Asset Sanctions Compliance Enhancement Act in an attempt
to ensure blacklisted Russian individuals and businesses do not use cryptocurrency to evade economic sanctions.

 On March 9, 2022, President
Biden signed an Executive Order on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets (the "Executive Order"), which outlined
a unified federal regulatory approach to addressing the risks and benefits of digital assets. The Executive Order articulated various
policy objectives related to digital assets, including investor protections, financial and national security risks, and responsible development
and use of digital assets. The Executive Order directed federal government departments and agencies to produce various reports, frameworks,
analyses, and regulatory and legislative recommendations to the Biden Administration. The policies and objectives of the Executive Order
are very broad, and, at this time, it is unclear what impact it may have on the regulation of bitcoin and other digital assets. The consequences
of increased federal regulation of digital assets and digital asset activities could have a material adverse effect on the Trust and the
Shares.

 On March 28, 2022, Representative
Stephen Lynch, along with co-sponsors Jes s G. Garc a, Rashida Tlaib, Ayanna Pressley, and Alma Adams, introduced H.R. 7231,
the Electronic Currency and Secure Hardware Act ("ECASH Act"), which would direct the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury Department
(not the Federal Reserve) to develop and issue a digital analogue to the U.S. dollar, or "e-cash," which is intended to "replicate
and preserve the privacy, anonymity-respecting, and minimal transactional data-generating properties of physical currency instruments
such as coins and notes to the greatest extent technically and practically possible," all without requiring a bank account. E-cash
would be legal tender, payable to the bearer and functionally identical to physical U.S. coins and notes, "capable of instantaneous,
final, direct, peer-to-peer, offline transactions using secured hardware devices that do not involve or require subsequent or final settlement
on or via a common or distributed ledger, or any other additional approval or validation by the United States Government or any other
third party payments processing intermediary," including fully anonymous transactions, and "interoperable with all existing
financial institutions and payment systems and generally accepted payments standards and network protocols, as well as other public payments
programs."

 On April 6, 2022, Senator
Pat Toomey released a draft of his Stablecoin Transparency of Reserves and Uniform Safe Transactions Act, or Stablecoin TRUST Act. The
draft bill contemplates a "payment stablecoin," which is convertible directly to fiat currency by the issuer. Only an insured
depositary institution, a money transmitting business (authorized by its respective state authority) or a new "national limited
payment stablecoin issuer" would be eligible to issue payment stablecoins. Additionally, payment stablecoins would be exempt from
the federal securities requirements, including the Securities Act of 1933 ("1933 Act"), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
("Exchange Act"), and the Investment Company Act of 1940 ("1940 Act").

 On June 7, 2022, Senators
Kirsten Gillibrand and Cynthia Lummis introduced the "Responsible Financial Innovation Act," which was drafted to "create
a complete regulatory framework for digital assets that encourages responsible financial innovation, flexibility, transparency and robust
consumer protections while integrating digital assets into existing law." Importantly, the legislation would assign regulatory authority
over digital asset spot markets to the CFTC and codify that digital assets that meet the definition of a commodity, such as bitcoin and
ether, would be regulated by the CFTC.

 In 2023, Congress continued
to consider several stand-alone digital asset bills, including a formal process to determine when digital assets will be treated as either
securities to be regulated by the SEC or commodities under the purview of the CFTC, what type of federal/state regulatory regime will
exist for payment stablecoins and the how the BSA will apply to cryptocurrency providers. The Financial Innovation and Technology for
the 21st Century Act ("FIT for the 21st Century Act") advanced through the United States House of Representatives in a vote
along bipartisan lines.

 The FIT for the 21st Century
Act would require the SEC and the CFTC to jointly issue rules or guidance that would outline their process in delisting a digital asset
that they deem inconsistent with the Commodity Exchange Act (the "CEA"), federal securities laws and the FIT for the 21st
Century Act. The bill, in part, would also provide a certification process for blockchains to be recognized as decentralized, which would
allow the SEC to challenge claims made by token issuers about meeting the outlined standards.

 Legislative efforts have also
focused on setting criteria for stablecoin issuers and what rules will govern redeemability and collateral. The Clarity for Payment Stablecoins
Act of 2023, as introduced by House Finance Committee Chair Patrick McHenry (the "McHenry bill"), would make it unlawful for
any entity other than a permitted payment stablecoin issuer to issue a payment stablecoin. The McHenry bill would establish bank-like
regulation and supervision for federal qualified nonbank payment stablecoin issuers. These requirements include capital, liquidity and
risk management requirements, application of the BSA and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act's customer privacy requirements, certain activities
limits, and broad supervision and enforcement authority. The McHenry bill would grant state regulators primary supervision, examination
and enforcement authority over state stablecoin issuers, leaving the Federal Reserve Board with secondary, backup enforcement authority
for "exigent" circumstances. The McHenry bill would also amend the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"),
the 1940 Act, the 1933 Act, the Exchange Act and the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 to specify that payment stablecoins are
not securities for purposes of those federal securities laws.

 Several other bills have advanced
through Congress to curb crypto as a payment gateway for illicit activity and money laundering. The "Blockchain Regulatory Clarity
Act" would provide clarity to the regulatory classification of digital assets, providing market certainty for innovators and clear
jurisdictional boundaries for regulators by affirming that blockchain developers and other related service providers that do not custody
customer funds are not money transmitters. The "Financial Technology Protection Act," another bipartisan measure, would set
up an independent Financial Technology Working Group to combat terrorism and illicit financing in cryptocurrency. The "Blockchain
Regulatory Certainty Act" aims to protect certain blockchain platforms from being designated as money-services businesses. Both
acts advanced through the House with bipartisan support.

 In a similar effort to prevent
money laundering and stop crypto-facilitated crime and sanctions violations, bipartisan legislation was introduced to require DeFi services
to meet the same anti-money laundering and economic sanctions compliance obligations as other financial companies. DeFi generally refers
to applications that facilitate peer-to-peer financial transactions that are recorded on blockchains. By design, DeFi provides anonymity,
which can allow malicious and criminal actors to evade traditional financial regulatory tools. Noting that transparency and sensible rules
are vital for protecting the financial system from crime, the "Crypto-Asset National Security Enhancement and Enforcement ('CANSEE')
Act" was introduced. The CANSEE Act would end special treatment for DeFi by applying the same national security laws that apply
to banks and securities brokers, casinos and pawn shops, and other cryptocurrency companies like centralized trading platforms. DeFi services
would be forced to meet basic obligations, most notably to maintain anti-money laundering programs, conduct due diligence on their customers,
and report suspicious transactions to FinCEN.

 Under regulations from the
New York State Department of Financial Services ("NYDFS"), businesses involved in digital asset business activity for third
parties in or involving New York, excluding merchants and consumers, must apply for a license, commonly known as a BitLicense, from the
NYDFS and must comply with anti-money laundering, cyber security, consumer protection, and financial and reporting requirements, among
others. As an alternative to a BitLicense, a firm can apply for a charter to become a limited purpose trust company under New York law
qualified to engage in digital asset business activity. Other states have considered or approved digital asset business activity statutes
or rules, passing, for example, regulations or guidance indicating that certain digital asset business activities constitute money transmission
requiring licensure.

 The inconsistency in applying
money transmitting licensure requirements to certain businesses may make it more difficult for these businesses to provide services, which
may affect consumer adoption of bitcoin and its price. In an attempt to address these issues, the Uniform Law Commission passed a model
law in July 2017, the Uniform Regulation of Virtual Currency Businesses Act, which has many similarities to the BitLicense and features
a multistate reciprocity licensure feature, wherein a business licensed in one state could apply for accelerated licensure procedures
in other states. It is still unclear, however, how many states, if any, will adopt some or all of the model legislation.

 The transparency of blockchains
has in the past facilitated investigations by law enforcement agencies. However, certain privacy-enhancing features have been or are expected
to be introduced to a number of digital asset networks, and these features may provide law enforcement agencies with less visibility into
transaction histories. Although no regulatory action has been taken to treat privacy-enhancing digital assets differently, this may change
in the future.

 Shareholders do not
have the protections associated with ownership of shares in an investment company registered under the 1940 Act or commodity pools under
the Commodity Exchange Act.

 The 1940 Act establishes a
comprehensive federal regulatory framework for investment companies. Regulation of investment companies under the 1940 Act is designed
to, among other things: prevent insiders from managing the companies to their benefit and to the detriment of public investors; prevent
the inequitable or discriminate issuance of investment company securities and prevent the use of unsound or misleading methods of computing
asset values. For example, registered investment companies subject to the 1940 Act must have a board of directors, a certain minimum percentage
of whom must be independent (generally, at least a majority). Further, after an initial two-year period, such registered investment companies'
advisory and sub-advisory contracts must be annually reapproved by a majority of (1) the entire board of directors and (2) the independent
directors. Additionally, such registered investment companies are subject to prohibitions and restrictions on transactions with their
affiliates and required to maintain fund assets with special types of custodians (generally, banks or broker-dealers). Moreover, such
registered investment companies are subject to significant limits on the use of leverage, as well as limits on the form of capital structure
and the types of securities a registered fund can issue.

 The Trust is not registered
as an investment company under the 1940 Act, and the Sponsor believes that the Trust is not permitted or required to register under such
act. Consequently, Shareholders do not have the regulatory protections provided to investors in investment companies.

 The Trust will not hold or
trade in commodity interests regulated by the CEA, as administered by the CFTC. Furthermore, the Sponsor believes that the Trust is not
a commodity pool for purposes of the CEA, and that neither the Sponsor nor the Trustee is subject to regulation by the CFTC as a commodity
pool operator or a commodity trading advisor in connection with the operation of the Trust. Consequently, Shareholders will not have the
regulatory protections provided to investors in CEA-regulated instruments or commodity pools.

 Future and current laws
and regulations by a United States or foreign government or quasi-governmental agencies could have an adverse effect on an investment
in the Trust.

 The regulation of bitcoin
and related products and services continues to evolve, may take many different forms and will, therefore, impact bitcoin and its usage
in a variety of manners. The inconsistent, unpredictable, and sometimes conflicting regulatory landscape may make it more difficult for
bitcoin businesses to provide services, which may impede the growth of the bitcoin economy and have an adverse effect on consumer adoption
of bitcoin. There is a possibility of future regulatory change altering, perhaps to a material extent, the nature of an investment in
the Trust or the ability of the Trust to continue to operate. Additionally, changes to current regulatory determinations of bitcoin's
status as not being a security, changes to regulations surrounding bitcoin futures or related products, or actions by a United States
or foreign government or quasi-governmental agencies exerting regulatory authority over bitcoin, the Bitcoin network, bitcoin trading,
or related activities impacting other parts of the digital asset market, may adversely impact bitcoin and therefore may have an adverse
effect on the value of your investment in the Trust.

 A number of jurisdictions
worldwide have adopted prohibitions or restrictions on bitcoin trading and other activity relating to virtual currencies and digital assets,
which could negatively affect bitcoin prices or demand. For instance, some observers believe that Chinese governmental regulatory actions
regarding bitcoin mining and trading activity were one factor that contributed to the drawdowns in global bitcoin prices in May 2021.

 Furthermore, legal claims
have been filed in the United Kingdom by an entity associated with an individual named Craig Wright. The entity alleges that the private
keys to bitcoin purportedly worth several billion dollars were rendered inaccessible to it in a hack, and advances a series of novel legal
theories in support of its request that the court compel certain core developers associated with the Bitcoin network to either somehow
transfer the bitcoin out of the bitcoin address to which the entity no longer can access the private keys to a new bitcoin address that
it currently does control, or alternatively amend the source code to the Bitcoin network itself to restore its access to the stranded
bitcoin. If a court decides to grant the relief requested, wide-ranging and fundamental changes to the source code, operations, and governance
of, and basic principles underlying, the Bitcoin network might be required, and a loss of public confidence in the Bitcoin network could
result, leading to a decrease in the value of bitcoin, which could negatively impact the value of the Shares.

 The legal status of bitcoin
and other digital assets varies substantially from country to country. In many countries, the legal status of bitcoin is still undefined
or changing. Some countries have deemed the usage of certain digital assets illegal. Other countries have banned digital assets or securities
or derivatives in respect to them (including for certain categories of investors), banned the local banks from working with digital assets
or have restricted digital assets in other ways. For example, bitcoin and other digital assets currently face an uncertain regulatory
landscape in many foreign jurisdictions, such as the European Union, China, the United Kingdom, Australia, Russia, Israel, Poland, India
and Canada. In some countries, such as the United States, different government agencies define digital assets differently, leading to
further regulatory conflict and uncertainty.

 In addition, cybersecurity
attacks by state actors, particularly for the purpose of evading international economic sanctions, are likely to attract additional regulatory
scrutiny to the acquisition, ownership, sale and use of digital assets, including bitcoin. The effect of any existing regulation or future
regulatory change on the Trust or bitcoin is impossible to predict, but such change could be substantial and adverse to the Trust and
the value of the Shares.

 Various foreign jurisdictions
have adopted, and may continue to adopt in the near future, laws, regulations or directives that affect bitcoin, particularly with respect
to bitcoin spot markets, trading venues and service providers that fall within such jurisdictions' regulatory scope. Countries may,
in the future, explicitly restrict, outlaw or curtail the acquisition, use, trade or redemption of bitcoin. Such laws, regulations or
directives may conflict with those of the United States and may negatively impact the acceptance of bitcoin by users, merchants and service
providers outside the United States and may therefore impede the growth or sustainability of the bitcoin economy in these jurisdictions
as well as in the United States and elsewhere, or otherwise negatively affect the value of bitcoin, and, in turn, the value of the Shares.

 Any change in regulation in
any particular jurisdiction may impact the supply and demand of that specific jurisdiction and other jurisdictions due to the global network
of exchanges for bitcoin, as well as composite prices used to calculate the underlying value of the Trust's bitcoin, as such data
sources span multiple jurisdictions.

 Future legal or regulatory
developments may negatively affect the value of bitcoin or require the Trust or the Sponsor to become registered with the SEC or CFTC,
which may cause the Trust to incur unforeseen expenses or liquidate.

 Current and future legislation,
SEC and CFTC rulemaking, and other regulatory developments may impact the manner in which bitcoin are treated for classification and clearing
purposes. In particular, although bitcoin is currently understood to be a commodity when transacted on a spot basis, bitcoin itself in
the future might be classified by the CFTC as a "commodity interest" under the CEA, subjecting all transactions in bitcoin
to full CFTC regulatory jurisdiction. Alternatively, in the future bitcoin might be classified by the SEC as a "security"
under U.S. federal securities laws. In the face of such developments, the required registrations and compliance steps may result in extraordinary,
nonrecurring expenses to the Trust. In particular, the Trust may be required to rapidly unwind its entire position in bitcoin at potentially
unfavorable prices and potentially terminate, in the event that bitcoin were determined to fall under the definition of a security under
U.S. securities laws. If the Sponsor decides to terminate the Trust in response to the changed regulatory circumstances, the Trust may
be dissolved or liquidated at a time that is disadvantageous to Shareholders. As of the date of this report, the Sponsor is not aware
of any rules that have been proposed to regulate bitcoin as a commodity interest or a security.

 To the extent that bitcoin
is determined to be a security, the Trust and the Sponsor may also be subject to additional regulatory requirements, including under the
1940 Act, and the Sponsor may be required to register as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act. If the Sponsor determines not to
comply with such additional regulatory and registration requirements, the Sponsor will terminate the Trust. Any such termination could
result in the liquidation of the Trust's bitcoin at a time that is disadvantageous to Shareholders. Alternatively, compliance with
these requirements could result in additional expenses to the Trust or significantly limit the ability of the Trust to pursue its investment
objective.

 To the extent that bitcoin
is deemed to fall within the definition of a "commodity interest" under the CEA, the Trust and the Sponsor may be subject
to additional regulation under the CEA and CFTC regulations. The Sponsor may be required to register as a commodity pool operator or commodity
trading advisor with the CFTC and become a member of the NFA and may be subject to additional regulatory requirements with respect to
the Trust, including disclosure and reporting requirements. These additional requirements may result in extraordinary, recurring and/or
nonrecurring expenses of the Trust, thereby materially and adversely impacting the Shares. If the Sponsor and/or the Trust determines
not to comply with such additional regulatory and registration requirements, the Sponsor may terminate the Trust. Any such termination
could result in the liquidation of the Trust's bitcoin at a time that is disadvantageous to Shareholders.

 The SEC has not asserted regulatory
authority over bitcoin or trading or ownership of bitcoin and has not expressed the view that bitcoin should be classified or treated
as a security for purposes of U.S. federal securities laws. In fact, senior members of the staff of the SEC have expressed the view that
bitcoin is not a security under the federal securities laws. However, the SEC has commented on bitcoin and bitcoin-related market developments
and has taken action against investment schemes involving bitcoin. For example, in a recent letter regarding the SEC's review of
proposed rule changes to list and trade shares of certain bitcoin-related investment vehicles on public markets, the SEC staff stated
that it has significant investor protection concerns regarding the markets for digital assets, including the potential for market manipulation
and fraud. In March 2018, it was reported that the SEC was examining as many as 100 investment funds with strategies focused on digital
assets. The reported focus of the examinations is on the accuracy of risk disclosures to investors in these funds, digital asset pricing
practices, and compliance with rules meant to prevent the theft of investor funds, as well as on information gathering so that the SEC
can better understand new technologies and investment products. It has further been reported that some of these funds have received subpoenas
from the SEC's Enforcement Division. The SEC also recently determined that certain digital assets are securities under the U.S.
securities laws. In these determinations, the SEC reasoned that the unregistered offer and sale of digital assets can, in certain circumstances,
including ICOs, be considered illegal public offering of securities. A significant amount of funding for digital asset startups has come
from ICOs, and if ICOs are halted or face obstacles, or companies that rely on them face legal action or investigation, it could have
a negative impact on the value of digital assets, including bitcoin. Finally, the SEC's Division of Examinations (then the Office
of Compliance Inspections and Examinations ("OCIE")) stated that digital assets were an examination priority for 2020. In
particular, OCIE intended to focus its examination on portfolio management of digital assets, safety of client funds and assets, pricing
and valuation of client portfolios, compliance and internal controls, and supervision of employee outside business activities.

 The SEC has recently proposed
rule changes amending and redesignating rule 206(4)-2 under the Advisers Act (the "Custody Rule"). The proposed "Safeguarding
Rule" would amend the definition of a "qualified custodian" under the Custody Rule and expand the scope of the Custody
Rule to cover all digital assets, including bitcoin, and related advisory activities. If enacted as proposed, these rule changes would
likely impose additional regulatory requirements with respect to the custody and storage of digital assets, including bitcoin. The Sponsor
is studying the impact that such amendments may have on the Trust and its arrangements with the Bitcoin Custodian. It is possible that
such amendments, if adopted, could prevent the Bitcoin Custodian from serving as service providers to the Trust, or require potentially
significant modifications to existing arrangements, which could cause the Trust to bear potentially significant increased costs. If the
Sponsor is unable to make such modifications or appoint successor service providers to fill the roles that the Bitcoin Custodian currently
plays, the Trust's operations (including in relation to creations and redemptions of Baskets and the holding of bitcoin) could be
negatively affected, the Trust could dissolve (including at a time that is potentially disadvantageous to Shareholders), and the value
of the Shares or an investment in the Trust could be affected. Further, the proposed amendments could have a severe negative impact on
the price of bitcoin and therefore the value of the Shares if enacted, by, among other things, making it more difficult for investors
to gain access to bitcoin, or causing certain holders of bitcoin to sell their holdings.

 If regulatory changes
or interpretations of an Authorized Participant's, the Trust's or the Sponsor's activities require the regulation of
an Authorized Participant, the Trust or the Sponsor as a money service business under the regulations promulgated by FinCEN under the
authority of the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act or as a money transmitter or digital asset business under state regimes for the licensing of such
businesses, an Authorized Participant, the Trust or the Sponsor may be required to register and comply with such regulations, which could
result in extraordinary, recurring and/or nonrecurring expenses to the Authorized Participant, Trust or Sponsor or increased commissions
for the Authorized Participant's clients, thereby reducing the liquidity of the Shares.

 To the extent that the activities
of any Authorized Participant, the Trust or the Sponsor cause it to be deemed a "money services business" under the regulations
promulgated by FinCEN under the authority of the BSA, such Authorized Participant, the Trust or the Sponsor may be required to comply
with FinCEN regulations, including those that would mandate the Authorized Participant to implement anti-money laundering programs, make
certain reports to FinCEN and maintain certain records. Similarly, the activities of an Authorized Participant, the Trust or the Sponsor
may require it to be licensed as a money transmitter or as a digital asset business, such as under NYDFS' BitLicense regulation.

 Such additional regulatory
obligations may cause the Authorized Participant, the Trust or the Sponsor to incur extraordinary expenses. If the Authorized Participant,
the Trust or the Sponsor decide to seek the required licenses, there is no guarantee that they will receive them in a timely manner. In
addition, to the extent an Authorized Participant, the Trust, or the Sponsor is found to have operated without appropriate state or federal
licenses, it may be subject to investigation, administrative or court proceedings, and civil or criminal monetary fines and penalties,
all of which could harm the reputation of the Authorized Participant, the Trust or the Sponsor and affect the value of the Shares. Furthermore,
an Authorized Participant, the Trust, or the Sponsor may not be able to acquire necessary state licenses or be capable of complying with
certain federal or state regulatory obligations applicable to money services businesses, money transmitters, and businesses engaged in
digital asset activity in a timely manner. The Authorized Participant may also instead decide to terminate its role as Authorized Participant
of the Trust, or the Sponsor may decide to terminate the Trust. Termination by the Authorized Participant may decrease the liquidity of
the Shares, which may adversely affect the value of the Shares, and any termination of the Trust in response to the changed regulatory
circumstances may be at a time that is disadvantageous to the Shareholders.

 Tax Risk

 The ongoing activities
of the Trust may generate tax liabilities for Shareholders.

 As described above under "TAXATION
OF THE TRUST," it is expected that each Shareholder will include in the computation of their taxable income their proportionate
share of the taxable income and expenses of the Trust, including gains and losses realized in connection with the use of bitcoin to pay
Trust expenses. The Trust does not anticipate making distributions to Shareholders, so any tax liability that a Shareholder incurs as
a result of holding Shares will need to be satisfied from some other source of funds. If a Shareholder sells Shares in order to raise
funds to satisfy such a tax liability, the sale itself may generate additional taxable gain or loss.

 The tax treatment of
bitcoin and transactions involving bitcoin for United States federal income tax purposes may change.

 Under current IRS guidance,
bitcoin is treated as property, not as currency, for U.S. federal income tax purposes and transactions involving payment in bitcoin in
return for goods and services are treated as barter exchanges. Such exchanges result in capital gain or loss measured by the difference
between the price at which bitcoin is exchanged and the taxpayer's basis in the bitcoin. However, because bitcoin is a new technological
innovation, because IRS guidance has taken the form of administrative pronouncements that may be modified without prior notice and comment,
and because there is as yet little case law on the subject, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of an investment in bitcoin or in transactions
relating to investments in bitcoin may change from that described in this report, possibly with retroactive effect. Any such change in
the U.S. federal income tax treatment of bitcoin may have a negative effect on prices of bitcoin and may adversely affect the value of
the Shares. In this regard, the IRS has indicated that it has made it a priority to issue additional guidance related to the taxation
of virtual currency transactions, such as transactions involving bitcoin. In addition, the IRS and U.S. Department of Treasury have proposed
regulations regarding the tax information reporting rules for crypto currency transactions. While it has started to issue such additional
guidance, whether any future guidance will adversely affect the U.S. federal income tax treatment of an investment in bitcoin or in transactions
relating to investments in bitcoin is unknown. Moreover, future developments that may arise with respect to digital currencies may increase
the uncertainty with respect to the treatment of digital currencies for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

 Investors should consult their
personal tax advisors before making any decision to purchase the Shares of the Trust. Additionally, the tax considerations contained herein
are in summary form and may not be used as the sole basis for the decision to invest in the Shares from a tax perspective, since the individual
situation of each investor must also be taken into account. Accordingly, the considerations regarding taxation contained herein any sort
of material information or tax advice nor are they in any way to be construed as a representation or warranty with respect to specific
tax consequences.

 The tax treatment of
bitcoin and transactions involving bitcoin for state and local tax purposes is not settled.

 Because bitcoin is a new technological
innovation, the tax treatment of bitcoin for state and local tax purposes, including without limitation state and local income and sales
and use taxes, is not settled. It is uncertain what guidance, if any, on the treatment of bitcoin for state and local tax purposes may
be issued in the future. A state or local government authority's treatment of bitcoin may have negative consequences, including
the imposition of a greater tax burden on investors in bitcoin or the imposition of a greater cost on the acquisition and disposition
of bitcoin generally. Moreover, it cannot be ruled out that the tax treatment by tax authorities and courts could be interpreted differently
or could be subject to changes in the future. Any such treatment may have a negative effect on prices of bitcoin and may adversely affect
the value of the Shares.

 The taxation of bitcoin and
associated companies can vary significantly by jurisdiction and is subject to risk of significant revision. Such revision, or the application
of new tax schemes or taxation in additional jurisdictions, may adversely impact the Trust's performance. Before making a decision
to invest in the Trust, investors should consult their local tax advisor on taxation.

 A hard "fork"
of the Bitcoin blockchain could result in Shareholders incurring a tax liability.

 The Trust intends to disclaim
any digital assets created by a fork of the Bitcoin blockchain. Although in certain circumstances the Sponsor may claim or receive new
digital assets created by such a fork and use good faith efforts to make those digital assets (or at the Sponsor's discretion, the
proceeds thereof) available to Shareholders as of the record date of the fork, there can be no assurance that the Sponsor will do so.
Therefore, if a fork of the Bitcoin network results in holders of bitcoin receiving a new digital asset of value, the Trust and the Shareholders
may not participate in that value.

 If a hard fork occurs in the
Bitcoin blockchain and the Trust claims the new forked asset, the Trust could hold both the original bitcoin and the new "forked"
asset. Under current IRS guidance, a hard fork resulting in the receipt of new units of cryptocurrency is a taxable event giving rise
to ordinary income equal to the value of the new cryptocurrency. The Trust Agreement will require that, if such a transaction occurs,
the Trust will as soon as possible direct the Bitcoin Custodian to distribute the new forked asset in-kind to the Sponsor, as
agent for the Shareholders, and the Sponsor will arrange to sell the new forked asset and for the proceeds to be distributed to the Shareholders.
Such a sale will give rise to gain or loss, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, if the amount realized on the sale differs from the
value of the new forked asset at the time it was received by the Trust. A hard fork may therefore give rise to additional tax liabilities
for Shareholders.

 Other Risks

 The Exchange on which
the Shares are listed may halt trading in the Trust's Shares, which would adversely impact a Shareholder's ability to sell
Shares.

 The Trust's Shares are
listed for trading on the Exchange under the market symbol, "ARKB." Trading in Shares may be halted due to market conditions
or, in light of the Exchange rules and procedures, for reasons that, in the view of the Exchange, make trading in Shares inadvisable.
In addition, trading is subject to trading halts or pauses caused by extraordinary market volatility pursuant to "circuit breaker"
rules and/or "limit up/limit down" rules that require trading to be halted or paused for a specified period based on a specified
market decline. Additionally, there can be no assurance that the requirements necessary to maintain the listing of the Trust's Shares
will continue to be met or will remain unchanged.

 The liquidity of the
Shares may also be affected by the withdrawal from participation of Authorized Participants, which could adversely affect the market price
of the Shares.

 In the event that one or more
Authorized Participants or market makers that have substantial interests in the Trust's Shares withdraw or "step away"
from participation in the purchase (creation) or sale (redemption) of the Trust's Shares, the liquidity of the Shares will likely
decrease, which could adversely affect the market price of the Shares and result in Shareholders incurring a loss on their investment.

 The market infrastructure
of the bitcoin spot market could result in the absence of active Authorized Participants able to support the trading activity of the Trust,
which would affect the liquidity of the Shares in the secondary market and make it difficult to dispose of Shares.

 Bitcoin is extremely volatile,
and concerns exist about the stability, reliability and robustness of many spot markets where bitcoin trade. In a highly volatile market,
or if one or more spot markets supporting the bitcoin market faces an issue, it could be extremely challenging for any Authorized Participants
to provide continuous liquidity in the Shares. There can be no guarantee that the Sponsor and Sub-Adviser will be able to find an Authorized
Participant to actively and continuously support the Trust.

 Shareholders that are
not Authorized Participants may only purchase or sell their Shares in secondary trading markets, and the conditions associated with trading
in secondary markets may adversely affect Shareholders' investment in the Shares.

 Only Authorized Participants
may create or redeem Baskets. All other Shareholders that desire to purchase or sell Shares must do so through the Exchange or in other
markets, if any, in which the Shares may be traded. Shares may trade at a premium or discount to the NAV per Share or the Principal Market
NAV per Share.

 The Sponsor and the
Sub-Adviser each rely heavily on key personnel. The departure of any such key personnel could negatively impact the Trust's operations
and adversely impact an investment in the Trust.

 The Sponsor and the Sub-Adviser
each rely heavily on key personnel to manage its activities. These key personnel intend to allocate their time managing the Trust in a
manner that they deem appropriate. If such key personnel were to leave or be unable to carry out their present responsibilities, it may
have an adverse effect on the management of the Sponsor or the Sub-Adviser, as applicable.

 Shareholders have no right
or power to take part in the management of the Trust. Accordingly, no investor should purchase Shares unless such investor is willing
to entrust all aspects of the management of the Trust to the Trustee, the Sponsor and the Sub-Adviser.

 In addition, certain personnel
performing services on behalf of the Sponsor or the Sub-Adviser will be shared with the respective affiliates of the Sponsor and the Sub-Adviser,
including with respect to execution, Trust operations and legal, regulatory and tax oversight. Such individuals will devote a small percentage
of their time to those activities.

 Additionally, there can be
no assurance that all of the personnel who provide services to the Trust will continue to be associated with the Trust for any length
of time. The loss of the services of one or more such individuals could have an adverse impact on the Trust's ability to realize
its investment objective.

 The Trust is new, and
if it is not profitable, the Trust may terminate and liquidate at a time that is disadvantageous to Shareholders.

 The Trust is new. If the Trust
does not attract sufficient assets to remain open (such as, for example, where the current and anticipated total assets of the Trust relative
to the current and anticipated total expenses of the Trust would make continued operation of the Trust impracticable), then the Trust
could be terminated and liquidated at the direction of the Sponsor (or required to do so because it is delisted by the Exchange). Termination
and liquidation of the Trust could occur at a time that is disadvantageous to Shareholders. When the Trust's assets are sold as
part of the Trust's liquidation, the resulting proceeds distributed to Shareholders may be less than those that may be realized
in a sale outside of a liquidation context.

 Shareholders do not
have the rights enjoyed by investors in certain other vehicles and may be adversely affected by a lack of statutory rights and by limited
voting and distribution rights.

 The Shares have limited voting
and distribution rights. For example, Shareholders do not have the right to elect directors, the Trust may enact splits or reverse splits
without Shareholder approval, and the Trust is not required to pay regular distributions, although the Trust may pay distributions at
the discretion of the Sponsor.

 Shareholders may be
adversely affected by creation or redemption orders that are subject to postponement, suspension or rejection under certain circumstances.

 The Trust may, in its discretion,
suspend the right of creation or redemption or may postpone the redemption or purchase settlement date, for (1) any period during
which an emergency exists as a result of which the fulfilment of a purchase order or the redemption distribution is not reasonably practicable
(for example, as a result of a significant technical failure, power outage, or network error) or (2) such other period as the Sponsor
determines to be necessary for the protection of the Shareholders of the Trust (for example, where acceptance of the total deposit required
to create each Basket ("Creation Basket Deposit") would have certain adverse tax consequences to the Trust or its Shareholders).
In addition, the Trust may reject a redemption order if the order is not in proper form as described in the Authorized Participant Agreement
or if the fulfilment of the order might be unlawful. Any such postponement, suspension or rejection could adversely affect a redeeming
Authorized Participant. Suspension of creation privileges may adversely impact how the Shares are traded and arbitraged on the secondary
market, which could cause them to trade at levels materially different (premiums and discounts) from the fair value of their underlying
holdings.

 Shareholders may be
adversely affected by an overstatement or understatement of the NAV or the Principal Market NAV calculation of the Trust due to the valuation
methodology employed on the date of the NAV or the Principal Market NAV calculation.

 The value established by using
the Index may be different from what would be produced through the use of another methodology. Bitcoin valued using techniques other than
those employed by the Index, including bitcoin investments that are "fair valued," may differ from the value established by
the Index.

 Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

 Not applicable.

 Item 1C. Cybersecurity

 Cybersecurity

 The Trust, through the Sponsor, has established
procedures to manage significant cybersecurity risks. The Trust's operations depend on the systems of the Sponsor and other third-party
providers. The Sponsor manages the Trust's day-to-day operations and has implemented a cybersecurity program that applies to the
Trust and its operations.

 Cybersecurity Program Overview

 The Sponsor has developed a cybersecurity program
to manage cyber risks relevant to the Trust. This program includes risk assessments, security measures, and continuous monitoring of systems
and networks. The Sponsor proactively identifies significant risks from new and evolving cybersecurity threats.

 The Trust relies on the Sponsor to engage external
experts, such as cybersecurity assessors, consultants, and compliance professionals, to review the cybersecurity measures and risk management
processes. These third parties are engaged on an as-needed basis, with some hired on an ongoing basis as managed service providers.

 The Trust relies on the Sponsor's risk management
program, which includes cyber risk assessments. These processes have been integrated into the Sponsor's overall risk management
system.

 The Trust engages various third parties to support
its operations. The Trust relies on the Sponsor's expertise in risk management, legal, information technology, and compliance when managing
risks from cybersecurity threats associated with these entities. Prior to engaging a key service provider, the Sponsor conducts a due
diligence process.

 The Sponsor has adopted a cybersecurity strategy
focused around a Zero Trust Network model throughout the entire operational environment, operating on the premise that no entity, system
or service provider within the Sponsor's IT security perimeter can be inherently trusted. The Sponsor actively monitors its cybersecurity
risks and has appointed an internal Cybersecurity Lead and partners with an outside service provider responsible for system monitoring
and alerting.

 In addition, the Sponsor enforces stringent security
requirements for storage devices and applications, including encryption at rest, full user activity tracking, and secure sharing of client
data. The Sponsor's email environment is further fortified with dual factor authentication and other security measures. The Sponsor
requires both two-factor and at rest encryption on all systems. The Sponsor requires through its compliance and cyber-security policy
that all system breaches detected by an employee are immediately escalated to the Chief Compliance Officer and Head of Legal.

 The Sponsor also has several archival systems
in place to monitor compliance. The Sponsor relies on a trusted firewall to manage and safeguard the Sponsor's network. Furthermore,
the Sponsor conducts regular reviews on third parties to ensure they have policies in place that are designed to prevent information security
lapses or breaches.

 Board Oversight of Cybersecurity Risks

 The Sponsor does not have a board of directors,
but rather, the board of directors (the "Board") of Amun Holdings Limited ("Parent Company") provides strategic
oversight on cybersecurity matters, including risks associated with cybersecurity threats. The Board relies upon the Parent Company's
Risk Committee for cybersecurity risk governance. The Parent Company's Risk Committee receives periodic updates regarding the overall
state of the Sponsor's cybersecurity program, information on the current threat landscape, and risks from cybersecurity threats
and cybersecurity incidents impacting the Trust.

 Management's Role in Assessing &
Managing Material Risks from Cybersecurity Threats

 The Sponsor's management, including the
Sponsor's CCO, is responsible for assessing and managing material risks from cybersecurity threats. The Sponsor's CCO approves
all changes to the cybersecurity policy. The Sponsor relies on its full-service compliance partner to stay updated on all SEC rules and
regulations and to recommend changes in the compliance policies when necessary. Management of the Sponsor is informed about and monitors
the prevention, detection, mitigation, and remediation of cybersecurity incidents impacting the Trust, including through the receipt of
notifications from service providers and reliance on communications with risk management, legal, information technology, and/or compliance
personnel of the Sponsor. The Head of Legal and CCO would receive notifications of a cybersecurity incident that impacts a service provider
of the Trust.

 The Trust has an Incident Response Plan and Business
Continuity/Disaster Recovery Plan, which it relies on the Sponsor's plans. The CCO of the Sponsor is responsible for determining
whether a cybersecurity incident is material to the Trust. Pursuant to the Sponsor's policies and procedures, an internal team at
the Sponsor is tasked with investigating all reported and suspected security breaches. The Sponsor is required to provide the required
notifications without unreasonable delay after the discovery of a breach.

 Assessment of Cybersecurity Risk

 The potential impact of risks from cybersecurity
threats on the Trust is assessed on an ongoing basis, and how such risks could materially affect the Trust's business strategy,
operational results, and financial condition are regularly evaluated. During the reporting period, the Trust has not identified any risks
from cybersecurity threats, including as a result of previous cybersecurity incidents, that the Trust believes have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Trust, including its business strategy, operational results, and financial condition.

 Item 2. Properties

 None.

 Item 3. Legal Proceedings

 From time to time, the Trust
may be a party to certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. As of December 31, 2023, the Trust was not subject to
any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, are any material legal proceeding threatened against the Trust.

 Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

 Not applicable.

 Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common
Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 Market Information

 ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF Shares
are listed on the Cboe BZX Exchange under the symbol "ARKB" and have been listed since January 11, 2024.

 Holders

 As of March 18, 2024, the
Trust had 1 holder of record, Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company.

 Sales of Unregistered
Securities and Use of Proceeds of Registered Securities

 On December 12, 2023, the
Sponsor, in its capacity as Seed Capital Investor, purchased Seed Creation Baskets comprising 2 Shares at a per-Share price of $50.00.
Total proceeds to the Trust from the sale of these Seed Creation Baskets were $100. These Seed Creation Baskets were redeemed for cash
on or about January 5, 2024.

 On January 9, 2024, the Seed
Capital Investor purchased the initial Seed Creation Baskets comprising 10,000 Shares at a per-share price of $46.88. Total proceeds to
the Trust from the sale of the Seed Creation Baskets were $468,806.44. On January 9, 2024, the Trust purchased 10 bitcoins with the proceeds
of the Seed Creation Baskets by transacting with a Bitcoin Counterparty to acquire bitcoin on behalf of the Trust in exchange for cash
provided by the Sponsor in its capacity as Seed Capital Investor. These Seed Creation Baskets were redeemed for cash on or about January
19, 2024.

 Item 6. [Reserved]

 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations

 This annual report on Form
10-K, including this "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," contains
"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. All statements
(other than statements of historical fact) included in this Form 10-K that address activities, events or developments that may occur in
the future, the Trust's operations, the Sponsor's plans and references to the Trust's future success and other similar
matters are forward-looking statements. Words such as "could," "would," "may," "expect,"
"intend," "estimate," "predict," and variations on such words or negatives thereof, and similar expressions
that reflect our current views with respect to future events and Trust performance, are intended to identify such forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are only predictions, subject to risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict and many of which
are outside of our control, and actual results could differ materially from those discussed. Forward-looking statements involve risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed therein. We express our estimates,
expectations, beliefs, and projections in good faith and believe them to have a reasonable basis. However, we make no assurances that
management's estimates, expectations, beliefs, or projections will be achieved or accomplished. These forward-looking statements
are based on assumptions about many important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking
statements. Such factors are discussed in: Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations of this Form 10-K; Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Form 10-K, and other parts of this Form 10-K. We do not intend
to update any forward-looking statements even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future, except as required
by the federal securities laws.

 Organization and Trust Overview

 The ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
(the "Trust") is a Delaware statutory trust, formed on June 22, 2021, pursuant to the Delaware Statutory Trust Act ("DSTA").
The Trust operates pursuant to an Amended and Restated Trust Agreement (the "Trust Agreement"). The Trust is not registered
as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act") and is not a
commodity pool for purposes of the Commodity Exchange Act ("CEA"). The Trust is managed and controlled by 21Shares US LLC
(the "Sponsor"). The Sponsor is a limited liability company formed in the state of Delaware on June 16, 2021, and is a wholly
owned subsidiary of Jura Pentium Inc., whose ultimate parent company is Amun Holdings Limited. The Sponsor is not subject to regulation
by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") as a commodity pool operator with respect to the Trust, or a commodity
trading advisor with respect to the Trust. The Trust is an exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that issues units of beneficial interest
(the "Shares") representing fractional undivided beneficial interests in its net assets that trade on the Cboe BZX Exchange,
Inc. (the "Exchange"). The Shares are listed for trading on the Exchange under a ticker symbol "ARKB".

 On December 12, 2023, the
Sponsor, in its capacity as Seed Capital Investor, subject to conditions, purchased Seed Creation Baskets comprising 2 Shares at a per-Share
price of $50.00, as described in "Seed Capital Investor." Total proceeds to the Trust from the sale of these Seed Creation
Baskets were $100. Delivery of the Seed Creation Baskets was made on December 12, 2023. These Seed Creation Baskets were redeemed for
cash on or about January 5, 2024.

 On January 9, 2024 (the "Seed
Capital Purchase Date"), the Seed Capital Investor purchased the initial Seed Creation Baskets comprising 10,000 Shares (the "Initial
Seed Creation Baskets") at a per-share price of $46.88. Total proceeds to the Trust from the sale of the Seed Creation Baskets were
$468,806.44. On January 9, 2024, the Trust purchased 10 bitcoins with the proceeds of the Seed Creation Baskets by transacting with a
Bitcoin Counterparty to acquire bitcoin on behalf of the Trust in exchange for cash provided by the Sponsor in its capacity as Seed Capital
Investor. These Seed Creation Baskets were redeemed for cash on or about January 19, 2024.

 The Trust's investment
objective is to seek to track the performance of bitcoin, as measured by the performance of the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate—New
York Variant (the "Index"), adjusted for the Trust's expenses and other liabilities. CF Benchmarks Ltd. is the administrator
for the Index (the "Index Provider"). The Index is designed to reflect the performance of bitcoin in U.S. dollars. In seeking
to achieve its investment objective, the Trust holds bitcoin at its Custodian and values its Shares daily based on the Index. The Trust
is a passive investment vehicle and is not a leveraged product. The Sponsor does not actively manage the bitcoin held by the Trust.

 The Trust issues Shares only
in Creation Units of 5,000 or multiples thereof. Creation Units are issued and redeemed in exchange for cash. Individual Shares will not
be redeemed by the Trust but are listed and traded on the Exchange under the ticker symbol "ARKB." The Trust issues Shares
in Creation Units on a continuous basis at the applicable NAV per Share on the creation order date.

 The Trust pays the unitary
Sponsor Fee of 0.21% of the Trust's bitcoin holdings. The Sponsor Fee is paid by the Trust to the Sponsor as compensation for services
performed under the Trust Agreement. The Sponsor is waiving the entire Sponsor Fee for (i) a six-month period which commenced on January
11, 2024 (the day the Trust's Shares were initially listed on the Exchange), or (ii) the first $1 billion of Trust assets, whichever
comes first.

 The Trust is an "emerging
growth company" as that term is used in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and, as such,
the Trust may elect to comply with certain reduced public company reporting requirements.

 The NAV of the Trust is used
by the Trust in its day-to-day operations to measure the net value of the Trust's assets. The NAV is calculated on each business
day and is equal to the aggregate value of the Trust's assets less its liabilities based on the Index price. In determining the
NAV of the Trust on any business day, the Administrator calculates the price of the bitcoin held by the Trust as of 4:00 p.m. ET on such
day. The Administrator also calculates the "NAV per Share" of the Trust, which equals the NAV of the Trust divided by the
number of outstanding Shares. For purposes of making these calculations, a business day means any day other than a day when the Exchange
is closed for regular trading.

 In addition to calculating
NAV and NAV per Share, for purposes of the Trust's financial statements, the Trust determines the Principal Market NAV and Principal
Market NAV per Share on each valuation date for such financial statements. The determination of the Principal Market NAV and Principal
Market NAV per Share is identical to the calculation of NAV and NAV per Share, respectively, except that the value of bitcoin is determined
using the fair value of bitcoin based on the price in the bitcoin market that the Trust considers its "principal market" as
of 4:00 p.m. ET on the valuation date, rather than using the Index.

 NAV and NAV per Share are
not measures calculated in accordance with GAAP and are not intended as substitute for Principal Market and Principal Market NAV per Share,
respectively.

 Critical Accounting Estimates

 The financial statements and
accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation
of these financial statements relies on estimates and assumptions that impact the Trust's financial position and results of operations.
These estimates and assumptions affect the Trust's application of accounting policies. Below is a summary of accounting policies
on cash and investment valuation. There were no material estimates involving a significant level of estimation uncertainty that had or
are reasonably likely to have had a material impact on the Trust's financial condition used in the preparation of the financial
statements. In addition, please refer to Note 2 to the Financial Statements included in this report for further discussion of the Trust's
accounting policies.

 Cash

 Cash includes non-interest
bearing, non-restricted cash maintained with one financial institution that does not exceed U.S. federally insured limits.

 Investment Valuation

 The Trust's policy is
to value investments held at fair value. The Trust follows the provisions of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements ("ASC 820").
ASC 820 provides guidance for determining fair value and requires increased disclosure regarding the inputs to valuation techniques used
to measure fair value. ASC 820 determines fair value to be the price that would be received for bitcoin in a current sale, which assumes
an exit price resulting from an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820-10 requires the assumption
that bitcoin is sold in its principal market to market participants (or in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market).

 Results of Operations

 The discussion below describes
our financial position as of December 31, 2023. Since the Trust commenced operations on January 11, 2024, there is no comparative period
for this discussion.

 As of December 31, 2023, the
Trust had not yet commenced operations. The Trust did not engage in any investment activity during the year ended December 31, 2023. In
its capacity as Seed Capital Investor, the Sponsor purchased $100 in Shares on December 12, 2023, and on December 12, 2023, took delivery
of 2 Shares at a per-Share price of $50.00. The Trust did not buy, sell, or hold any bitcoin during the period December 12, 2023 (initial
seed creation date) through December 31, 2023.

 Liquidity and Capital Resources

 The Trust is not aware of
any trends, demands, commitments, events, or uncertainties that are reasonably likely to result in material changes to its liquidity needs.
The Trust's only ordinary recurring expense is the fee paid to the Sponsor at an annual rate of 0.21% of the daily net asset value
of the Trust. The Sponsor is waiving the entire Sponsor Fee for (i) a six-month period which commenced on January 11, 2024 (the day the
Trust's Shares were initially listed on the Exchange), or (ii) the first $1 billion of Trust assets, whichever comes first. In exchange
for the Sponsor's fee, the Sponsor has agreed to assume the ordinary fees and expenses incurred by the Trust, including but not
limited to the following: fees charged by the Sub-Adviser, Administrator, the Custodians, Transfer Agent and the Trustee, the Marketing
Fee, Cboe BZX Exchange listing fees, typical maintenance and transaction fees of the DTC, SEC registration fees, printing and mailing
costs, website fees, tax reporting fees, audit fees, license fees and expenses, up to $100,000 per annum in ordinary legal fees and expenses.
The Sponsor bears expenses in connection with the Trust's organization and initial offering costs.

 The Sponsor is not required
to pay any extraordinary or non-routine expenses. Extraordinary expenses are fees and expenses which are unexpected or unusual in nature,
such as legal claims and liabilities and litigation costs or indemnification or other unanticipated expenses. Extraordinary fees and expenses
also include material expenses which are not currently anticipated obligations of the Trust. The Trust will be responsible for the payment
of such expenses to the extent any such expenses are incurred. Routine operational, administrative, and other ordinary expenses are not
deemed extraordinary expenses. The Trust will sell bitcoin on an as-needed basis to pay the Sponsor's fee.

 Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 The Trust does not have any
off-balance sheet arrangements.

 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
about Market Risk

 We are a smaller reporting
company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information otherwise required under this
item.

 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data

 See Index to Financial Statements
on page F-1 for a list of the financial statements being filed herein.

 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants
on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 There have been no changes
in accountants and no disagreements with accountants on any matter of accounting principles or practices or financial statement disclosures
during the period from December 12, 2023 (initial seed creation date) through December 31, 2023.

 Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

 Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 The duly authorized officers of the Sponsor performing
functions equivalent to those a principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Trust would perform if the Trust had
any officers, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Trust's disclosure controls and procedures, and have concluded that the disclosure
controls and procedures of the Trust were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to provide reasonable assurance
that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Trust files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that
it is accumulated and communicated to the duly authorized officers of the Sponsor performing functions equivalent to those a principal
executive officer and principal financial officer of the Trust would perform if the Trust had any officers, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.

 There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness
of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the
controls and procedures.

 Exemption from Management's Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 This annual report does not include a report of
management's assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting due to a transition period established by rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission for newly public companies.

 Item 9B. Other Information

 No officers or directors of the Sponsor have adopted,
modified, or terminated trading plans under either a Rule 10b5-1 or non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement (as such terms are defined in
Item 408 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act of 1933) during the period from December 12, 2023 (initial seed creation date) through
December 31, 2023.

 Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions
that Prevent Inspections

 Not applicable.

 Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and
Corporate Governance

 The Trust does not have any directors, officers,
or employees. The following persons, in their respective capacities as directors or executive officers of the Sponsor, a Delaware limited
liability company, perform certain functions with respect to the Trust that, if the Trust had directors or executive officers, would typically
be performed by them.

 Hany Rashwan is CEO of the Sponsor and Ophelia
Snyder is President and Chief Financial Officer of the Sponsor.

 Hany Rashwan, 33, co-founded the parent
organization of Sponsor and 21Shares AG in 2018 and has served as its CEO since inception. In addition to co-founding 21Shares AG, Mr.
Rashwan is a serial entrepreneur and Forbes 30 Under 30 alum. He previously founded social commerce company, Ribbon, and enterprise fintech
company, Payout. He was born and raised in Egypt and the United States and holds a bachelor's in history from Columbia University.

 Ophelia Snyder, 31, co-founded the parent
organization of Sponsor and 21Shares AG in 2018 and has served as its President since inception. In addition to co-founding 21Shares AG.
Ms. Snyder is an EY Entrepreneurial Winning Woman EMEIA, Forbes 30 Under 30 alum, and was named on Bilanz's Top 100 Bankers of Switzerland
list. She began her career working in venture capital and then investment banking. She was born and raised in the United States and Italy
and attended Stanford University and received her Master of Business Administration from the New York University Stern School of Business.

 The Trust does not have a code of ethics as it
does not have any directors, officers, or employees.

 The Sponsor has a code of ethics (the "Code
of Ethics") that applies to its executive officers, including its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, who
perform certain functions with respect to the Trust that, if the Trust had executive officers would typically be performed by them. The
Sponsor's Policies are in place and require that the Sponsor eliminate, mitigate, or otherwise disclose conflicts of interest. Additionally,
the Sponsor has adopted policies and procedures requiring that certain applicable personnel pre-clear personal trading activity in which
bitcoin is the referenced asset. The Sponsor has also implemented an Information Barrier Policy restricting certain applicable personnel
from obtaining sensitive information. The Sponsor believes that these controls are reasonably designed to mitigate the risk of conflicts
of interest and other impermissible activity. The Code of Ethics is available on request, free of charge, by writing the Sponsor at etf@21shares.com
or calling the Sponsor at (646) 370-6016.

 Item 11. Executive Compensation

 The Trust does not have directors or executive
officers. The only ordinary expense paid by the Trust is the Sponsor's fee. For the period from December 12, 2023 (initial seed
creation date) through December 31, 2023, the Trust did not incur any Sponsor's fee. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the
Trust did not incur Sponsor's fees.

 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

 There are no persons known by the Trust to own directly or indirectly
beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding Shares of the Trust as of March 26, 2024.

 Security Ownership of Management

 The Trust does not have directors or executive officers.

 Change in Control

 Neither the Sponsor nor the Trustee knows of any arrangements which
may subsequently result in a change in control of the Trust.

 Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity
Compensation Plans

 The Trust has no securities authorized for issuance
under equity compensation plans.

 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions

 See Item 11.

 Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

 Fees for services performed by Cohen & Company,
Ltd., as paid by the Sponsor from the Sponsor fee, for the period ended December 31, 2023, were:

 2023

 Audit fees

 $
 9,500

 Audit-related fees

 $
 -

 Tax fees

 $
 -

 All other fees

 $
 -

 Total

 $
 9,500

 In the table above, in accordance with the SEC's
definitions and rules, Audit Fees are fees paid to Cohen & Company, Ltd. for professional services for the audit of the Trust's
financial statements included in the Form 10-K and review of financial statements included in the Forms 10-Q, and for services that are
normally provided by the accountants in connection with regulatory filings or engagements. Audit Related Fees are fees for assurance and
related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Trust's financial statements.

 Approval of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm Services and Fees

 The Sponsor approved all of the services provided
by Cohen & Company, Ltd. described above. The Sponsor pre-approved all audit services of the independent registered public accounting
firm, including all engagement fees and terms.

 Item 15.
 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 (a)(1) Financial Statements

 See Index to Financial Statements on page F-1.

 (a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules

 No financial statement schedules are filed
herewith because (i) such schedules are not required or (ii) the information required has been presented in the aforementioned
financial statements.

 (a)(3) Exhibits

 The following documents are filed herewith
or incorporated herein and made a part of this Annual Report:

 No.

 Exhibit Description

 3.1

 Trust Agreement of ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (1)

 3.2

 Form of Amended and Restated Trust Agreement (2)

 3.3

 Certificate of Trust (1)

 4.1

 Description of Securities Registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (5)

 10.1

 Form of Sponsor Agreement (4)

 10.2

 Form of Authorized Participant Agreement (2)

 10.3

 Form of Support Services Agreement (1)

 10.4

 Form of Prime Broker Agreement (2)

 10.5

 Form of Custodial Services Agreement (included as Exhibit A to Form of Prime Broker Agreement) (1)

 10.6

 Form of Fund Administration and Accounting Agreement (1)

 10.7

 Form of Transfer Agency and Services Agreement (1)

 10.8

 Form of Index Licensing Agreement (1)

 10.9

 Form of Marketing Agent Agreement (1)

 10.10

 Form of Cash Custody Agreement (1)

 10.11

 Subscription Agreement (1)

 10.12

 Initial Seed Capital Subscription Agreement (4)

 31.1

 Certification by Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (5)

 31.2

 Certification by Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (5)

 32.1

 Certification by Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (5)

 32.2

 Certification by Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (5)

 97.1

 Executive Officer Incentive-Based Compensation Clawback Policy (5)

 101.INS

 101.SCH

 101.CAL

 101.DEF

 101.LAB

 101.PRE

 (1)
 Incorporated by reference to
Pre-Effective Amendment No. 4 filed by the Registrant on December 18, 2023.

 (2)
 Incorporated by reference to
Pre-Effective Amendment No. 5 filed by the Registrant on December 28, 2023.

 (3)
 Incorporated by reference to
Pre-Effective Amendment No. 6 filed by the Registrant on January 8, 2024.

 (4)

 Incorporated by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 8 filed by the Registrant on January 9, 2024.

 (5)

 Filed herewith.

 Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

 None.

 GLOSSARY OF DEFINED
TERMS

 "Advisers Act": The Investment
Advisers Act of 1940.

 "1933 Act": The Securities Act
of 1933.

 "1940 Act": Investment Company
Act of 1940.

 "Administrator": The Bank of New
York Mellon.

 "Authorized Participant": One
that purchases or redeems Baskets from or to the Trust.

 "Basket": A block of 5,000 Shares
used by the Trust to issue or redeem Shares.

 "Basket Deposit": The total deposit
required to create each Basket.

 "Bitcoin": Is a system for decentralized
digital value exchange that is designed to enable units of bitcoin to be transferred across borders without the need for currency conversion.
Bitcoin is not legal tender. The supply of bitcoin is not determined by a central government, but rather by an open-source software program
that limits both the total amount of bitcoin that will be produced and the rate at which it is released into the network. The responsibility
for maintaining the official ledger of who owns what bitcoin and for validating new bitcoin transactions is not entrusted to any single
central entity. Instead, it is distributed among the network's participants.

 "Bitcoin Counterparty": Designated
third party, who is not an Authorized Participant but who may be an affiliate of an Authorized Participant, or the Prime Broker or Lender,
as applicable, with whom the Sponsor has entered into an agreement on behalf of the Trust, that will, acting as a counterparty, deliver,
receive or convert to U.S. dollars the bitcoin related to the Authorized Participant's creation or redemption order.

 "Bitcoin Custodian": Coinbase
Custody Trust Company, LLC.

 "Blockchain (or Bitcoin blockchain)":
the public transaction ledger of the Bitcoin network on which miners or mining pools solve algorithmic equations allowing them to add
records of recent transactions (called "blocks") to the chain of transactions in exchange for an award of bitcoin from the
Bitcoin network and the payment of transaction fees, if any, from users whose transactions are recorded in the block being added.

 "Business Day": Any day other
than a day when the Exchange or the New York Stock Exchange is closed for regular trading.

 "CEA": Commodity Exchange Act
of 1936.

 "CFTC": Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, an independent agency with the mandate to regulate commodity futures and options in the United States.

 "Code": Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended.

 "DTC": The Depository Trust Company.
DTC will act as the securities depository for the Shares.

 "DTC Participant": An entity that
has an account with DTC.

 "Exchange": Cboe BZX Exchange,
Inc.

 "Exchange Act": The Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 "FINRA": Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, formerly the National Association of Securities Dealers.

 "GAAP": U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.

 "Indirect Participants": Banks,
brokers, dealers and trust companies that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a DTC Participant, either directly or
indirectly.

 "Incidental Rights": Rights to
acquire, or otherwise establish dominion and control over, any virtual currency or other asset or right, which rights are incident to
the Trust's ownership of bitcoin and arise without any action of the Trust, or of the Sponsor or Sub-Adviser on behalf of the Trust.

 "IRS": U.S. Internal Revenue Service.

 "IR Virtual Currency": Virtual
currency tokens, or other assets or rights, acquired by the Trust through the exercise (subject to the applicable provisions of the Trust
Agreement) of any Incidental Right.

 "Lender": Coinbase Credit, Inc.

 "Marketing Agent": Foreside Global
Services, LLC.

 "NAV": Net asset value of the
Trust.

 "NAV per Share": Net asset value
of the Trust per Share.

 "NFA": National Futures Association.

 "Prime Broker": Coinbase, Inc.

 "Principal Market NAV": Net asset
value of the Trust determined on a GAAP basis.

 "Principal Market NAV per Share":
Net asset value of the Trust per Share determined on a GAAP basis.

 "Redemption Order Date": The date
a redemption order is received in satisfactory form by the Marketing Agent.

 "Register": The record of all
shareholders and holders of the Shares in certificated form kept by the Administrator.

 "SEC": The U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission.

 "Seed Capital Investor": 21Shares
US LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

 "Seed Creation Baskets": Shares
of the Trust purchased by the Seed Capital Investor.

 "Shares": Common shares representing
fractional undivided beneficial interests in the Trust.

 "Shareholders": Holders of Shares.

 "Sponsor": 21Shares US LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company.

 "Sub-Adviser": ARK Investment
Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

 "Transfer Agent": The Bank of
New York Mellon.

 "Trust": ARK 21Shares Bitcoin
ETF.

 "Trust Agreement": Amended and
Restated Trust Agreement of ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF.

 "Trustee": Delaware Trust Company,
a Delaware trust company.

 "You": The owner or holder of
Shares.

 SIGNATURES

 Pursuant to the requirements
of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 ARK
21Shares Bitcoin ETF (Registrant)

 By: 21Shares US LLC, its Sponsor

 Signature

 Title (Capacity)

 Date

 /s/ Hany Rashwan

 Chief Executive Officer

 Hany Rashwan

 (Principal Executive Officer)

 /s/ Ophelia Snyder

 Principal Financial Officer and

 Ophelia Snyder

 Principal Accounting Officer

 Pursuant to the requirements
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in
the capacities* and on the dates indicated.

 Signature

 Title (Capacity)

 Date

 /s/ Hany Rashwan

 Chief Executive Officer

 Hany Rashwan

 (Principal Executive Officer)

 /s/ Ophelia Snyder

 Principal Financial Officer and

 Ophelia Snyder

 Principal Accounting Officer

 Ark 21shares
Bitcoin ETF

 index to
financial statements

 Page

 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 925)

 Statement of Assets and Liabilities

 Statement of Changes in Net Assets

 Statement of Cash Flows

 Notes to Financial Statements

 F- 1

 Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 To the Sponsor and Shareholder of

 ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF

 Opinion on the Financial Statements

 We have audited the accompanying statement of assets
and liabilities of ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (the "Trust") as of December 31, 2023, and the related statements of changes in
net assets and cash flows, and the related notes, for the period December 12, 2023 (initial seed creation date) through

December 31, 2023 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Trust as of December 31, 2023, and the results of its changes in its net
assets and its cash flows for the period December 12, 2023 (initial seed creation date) through December 31, 2023, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 Basis for Opinion

 These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Trust's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Trust's financial statements based on our audit.
We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and
are required to be independent with respect to the Trust in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards
of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Trust is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an
audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control
over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trust's internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

 Our audit includes performing procedures to assess
the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond
to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
Our procedures included confirmation of cash owned as of December 31, 2023, by correspondence with the custodian. Our audit also included
evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation
of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 We have served as the Trust's auditor since
2023.

 /s/ Cohen & Company,
Ltd.

 Cohen & Company, Ltd.

 Hunt Valley, Maryland

 We have served as the auditor
of the Trust since its commencement of operations.

 F- 2

 ark
21shares Bitcoin ETF

 STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

 At December 31, 2023

 December
31, 2023

 Assets:

 Cash

 $

 Total assets

 Liabilities:

 Total liabilities

 -

 Net Assets

 $

 Shares issued and outstanding, no par value, unlimited amount authorized

 Net asset value per Share

 $
 50.00

 The accompanying notes are an integral part
of the Financial Statements.

 F- 3

 ark
21shares Bitcoin ETF

 STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

 For the period December 12, 2023 (initial seed
creation date) through December 31, 2023

 Net Assets, beginning of period

 For the period

 December 12,

 2023 (initial seed creation date) through December 31, 2023

 Increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations:

 $
 –

 Net investment loss

 –

 Net realized gain (loss) on investment in bitcoin

 –

 Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

 –

 Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations

 –

 Increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from capital share transactions:

 Contributions for Shares issued

 ^

 Distributions for Shares redeemed

 –

 Net increase in net assets resulting from capital share transactions

 Increase (decrease) in net assets

 Net Assets, end of period

 $

 Shares issued and redeemed

 Shares issued

 ^

 Shares redeemed

 –

 Net increase (decrease) in Shares issued and outstanding

 ^
 The amount represents the initial seed on December 12, 2023.

 The accompanying notes are an integral part
of the Financial Statements.

 F- 4

 ark
21shares Bitcoin ETF

 STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

 For the period December 12, 2023 (initial seed
creation date) through December 31, 2023

 For the period

 December 12,

 2023 (initial seed creation date) through December 31, 2023

 Cash Provided (used in) by Operating Activities:

 Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations

 $
 –

 Adjustments to reconcile net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 Cost of bitcoin purchased

 –

 Proceeds from bitcoin sold

 –

 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 –

 Cash flow Provided by Financing Activities:

 Shares issued

 ^

 Shares redeemed

 –

 Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 Cash

 Net increase (decrease) in cash

 Cash, beginning of period

 –

 Cash, end of period

 $

 ^
 The
amount represents the initial seed on December 12, 2023.

 The accompanying notes are an integral part
of the Financial Statements.

 F- 5

 ARK 21Shares
Bitcoin ETF

 Notes to
Financial Statements

 1.
 Organization

 The ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
(the "Trust") is a Delaware statutory trust, formed on June 22, 2021, pursuant to the Delaware Statutory Trust Act ("DSTA").
The Trust operates pursuant to an Amended and Restated Trust Agreement (the "Trust Agreement"). Delaware Trust Company, a
Delaware trust company, is the trustee of the Trust (the "Trustee"). The Trust is managed and controlled by 21 Shares US LLC
(the "Sponsor"). The Sponsor is a limited liability company formed in the state of Delaware on June 16, 2021, and is a wholly
owned subsidiary of Jura Pentium Inc., whose ultimate parent company is Amun Holdings Limited. Coinbase Custody Trust Company, LLC ("Coinbase
Custody") (the "Custodian") is the custodian for the Trust and will hold all of the Trust's bitcoin on the Trust's
behalf. The transfer agent (the "Transfer Agent") and the administrator for the Trust (the "Administrator") is
Bank of New York Mellon.

 The Trust is an exchange-traded
fund ("ETF") that issues units of beneficial interest (the "Shares") representing fractional undivided beneficial
interests in its net assets that trade on the Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the "Exchange"). The Shares were listed for trading
on the Exchange on January 10, 2024, under the ticker symbol "ARKB".

 The Trust's investment
objective is to seek to track the performance of bitcoin, as measured by the performance of the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate—New
York Variant (the "Index"), adjusted for the Trust's expenses and other liabilities. CF Benchmarks Ltd. is the administrator
for the Index (the "Index Provider"). The Index is designed to reflect the performance of bitcoin in U.S. dollars. In seeking
to achieve its investment objective, the Trust holds bitcoin at its Custodian and values its Shares daily based on the Index.

 ARK Investment Management
LLC (the "Sub-Adviser") is the sub-adviser of the Trust and provides assistance in the marketing of the Shares. The Trust's
Shares are neither interests in nor obligations of the Sponsor, the Sub-Adviser, or the Trustee.

 The Trust is an "emerging
growth company" as that term is used in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and, as such,
the Trust may elect to comply with certain reduced public company reporting requirements.

 On December 12, 2023, the
Sponsor, in its capacity as Seed Capital Investor, subject to conditions, purchased Seed Creation Baskets comprising 2 Shares at a per-Share
price of $ 50.00, as described in "Seed Capital Investor." Total proceeds to the Trust from the sale of these Seed Creation
Baskets were $ 100. Delivery of the Seed Creation Baskets was made on December 12, 2023. These Seed Creation Baskets were redeemed for
cash on or about January 5, 2024.

 On January 9, 2024 (the "Seed
Capital Purchase Date"), the Seed Capital Investor purchased the initial Seed Creation Baskets comprising 10,000 Shares (the "Initial
Seed Creation Baskets") at a per-share price of $ 46.88. Total proceeds to the Trust from the sale of the Seed Creation Baskets were
$ 468,806.44. On January 9, 2024, the Trust purchased 10 bitcoins with the proceeds of the Seed Creation Baskets by transacting with a
Bitcoin Counterparty to acquire bitcoin on behalf of the Trust in exchange for cash provided by the Sponsor in its capacity as Seed Capital
Investor. These Seed Creation Baskets were redeemed for cash on or about January 19, 2024.

 2.
 Significant Accounting Policies

 Basis of Accounting

 The Financial Statement has
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("US GAAP" or "GAAP").

 The Trust qualifies as an
investment company solely for accounting purposes and not for any other purpose and follows the accounting and reporting guidance under
the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 946, Financial Services
- Investment Companies, but is not registered, and is not required to be registered, as an investment company under the Investment Company
Act of 1940, as amended. The Trust uses fair value as its method of accounting for bitcoin in accordance with its classification as an
investment company for accounting purposes.

 The preparation of the financial
statement in conformity with US GAAP requires the Trust to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statement and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results may differ materially from such estimates as additional information becomes available or actual amounts may become determinable.
Should actual results differ from those previously recognized, the recorded estimates will be revised accordingly with the impact reflected
in the operating results of the Trust in the reporting period in which they become known.

 F- 6

 Cash

 Cash includes non-interest
bearing, non-restricted cash maintained with one financial institution that does not exceed U.S. federally insured limits.

 Investment Valuation

 US GAAP defines fair value
as the price the Trust would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date. The Trust's policy is to value investments held at fair value.

 The Trust identifies and determines
the bitcoin principal market (or in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market) for GAAP purposes consistent with
the application of the fair value measurement framework in FASB ASC 820. A principal market is the market with the greatest volume and
activity level for the asset or liability. The determination of the principal market will be based on the market with the greatest volume
and level of activity that can be accessed. The Trust obtains relevant volume and level of activity information and based on initial analysis
will select an exchange market as the Trust's principal market. The NAV and NAV per Share will be calculated using the fair value
of bitcoin based on the price provided by this exchange market, as of 4:00 p.m. ET on the measurement date for GAAP purposes. The Trust
will update its principal market analysis periodically and as needed to the extent that events have occurred, or activities have changed
in a manner that could change the Trust's determination of the principal market.

 Various inputs are used in
determining the fair value of assets and liabilities. Inputs may be based on independent market data ("observable inputs")
or they may be internally developed ("unobservable inputs"). These inputs are categorized into a disclosure hierarchy consisting
of three broad levels for financial reporting purposes. The level of a value determined for an asset or liability within the fair value
hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The three levels
of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

 Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

 Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices
included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar
assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not considered
to be active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived principally
from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means; and

 Level 3: Unobservable inputs, including
the Trust's assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments, where there is little or no market activity for the asset or
liability at the measurement date.

 The cost basis of the investment
in bitcoin recorded by the Trust for financial reporting purposes is the fair value of bitcoin at the time of transfer. The cost basis
recorded by the Trust may differ from proceeds collected by the Authorized Participant from the sale of the corresponding Shares to investors.

 Investment Transactions

 The Trust considers investment transactions to
be the receipt of bitcoin for Share creations and the delivery of bitcoin for Share redemptions or for payment of expenses in bitcoin.
The Trust records its investments transactions on a trade date basis and changes in fair value are reflected as net change in unrealized
appreciation or depreciation on investments. Realized gains and losses are calculated using the specific identification method. Realized
gains and losses are recognized in connection with transactions including settling obligations for the Sponsor's Fee in bitcoin.

 Calculation of Net Asset Value (NAV) and NAV
per Share

 On each business day, as soon
as practicable after 4:00 p.m. (Eastern Time), the net asset value of the Trust is obtained by subtracting all accrued fees, expenses
and other liabilities of the Trust from the fair value of the bitcoin and other assets held by the Trust. The Trustee computes the net
asset value per Share by dividing the net asset value of the Trust by the number of Shares outstanding on the date the computation is
made.

 F- 7

 Federal Income Taxes

 The Sponsor and the Trustee
will treat the Trust as a "grantor trust" for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Although not free from doubt due to the lack
of directly governing authority, if the Trust operates as expected, the Trust should be classified as a "grantor trust" for
U.S. federal income tax purposes and the Trust itself should not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. Each beneficial owner of Shares
will be treated as directly owning its pro rata Share of the Trust's assets and a pro rata portion of the Trust's income, gain, losses
and deductions will "flow through" to each beneficial owner of Shares. If the Trust sells bitcoin (for example, to pay fees
or expenses), such a sale is a taxable event to Shareholders. Upon a Shareholder's sale of its Shares, the Shareholder will be treated
as having sold the pro rata share of the bitcoin held in the Trust at the time of the sale and may recognize gain or loss on such sale.
The Sponsor has reviewed the tax positions as of December 31, 2023, and has determined that no provision for income tax is required in
the Trust's financial statements.

 3.
 Trust Expenses

 The Trust pays the unitary
Sponsor Fee of 0.21 % of the Trust's bitcoin holdings. The Sponsor Fee is paid by the Trust to the Sponsor as compensation for services
performed under the Trust Agreement. The Sponsor is waiving the entire Sponsor Fee for (i) a six-month period which commenced on January
11, 2024 (the day the Trust's Shares were initially listed on the Exchange), or (ii) the first $ 1 billion of Trust assets, whichever
comes first.

 The Sponsor has agreed to
pay all operating expenses (except for litigation expenses and other extraordinary expenses) out of the Sponsor Fee. Operating expenses
assumed by the Sponsor include (i) fees to the Sub-Adviser; (ii) the Marketing Fee, (iii) fees to the administrator, if any, (iv) fees
to the bitcoin Custodian, (v) fees to the Transfer Agent, (vi) fees to the Trustee, (vii) the fees and expenses related to any future
listing, trading or quotation of the Shares on any listing exchange or quotation system (including legal, marketing and audit fees and
expenses), (viii) ordinary course legal fees and expenses but not litigation-related expenses, (ix) audit fees, (x) regulatory fees, including,
if applicable, any fees relating to the registration of the Shares under the 1933 Act or Exchange Act, (xi) printing and mailing costs;
(xii) costs of maintaining the Trust's website and (xiii) applicable license fees (each, a "Sponsor-paid Expense," and
together, the "Sponsor-paid Expenses"), provided that any expense that qualifies as an Additional Trust Expense (as defined
below) will be deemed to be an Additional Trust Expense and not a Sponsor-paid Expense.

 The Sponsor will not, however,
assume certain extraordinary, non-recurring expenses that are not Sponsor-paid Expenses, including, but not limited to, taxes and governmental
charges, expenses and costs of any extraordinary services performed by the Sponsor (or any other service provider) on behalf of the Trust
to protect the Trust or the interests of Shareholders, any indemnification of the bitcoin Custodian, Administrator or other agents, service
providers or counter-parties of the Trust, the fees and expenses related to the listing, and extraordinary legal fees and expenses, including
any legal fees and expenses incurred in connection with litigation, regulatory enforcement or investigation matters (collectively, "Additional
Trust Expenses"). Of the Sponsor-paid Expenses, ordinary course legal fees and expenses shall be subject to a cap of $ 100,000 per
annum. In the Sponsor's sole discretion, all or any portion of a Sponsor-paid Expense may be re-designated as an Additional Trust
Expense.

 To the extent that the Sponsor
does not voluntarily assume expenses, they will be the responsibility of the Trust. The Sponsor also pays the costs of the Trust's
organization and offering. The Trust is not obligated to repay any such costs related to the Trust's organization and offering paid
by the Sponsor.

 4.
 Creation and Redemption of Shares

 The Trust creates and redeems
Shares on a continuous basis but only in Creation Units consisting of 5,000 Shares or multiples thereof. Only Authorized Participants,
which are registered broker-dealers who have entered into written agreements with the Sponsor and the Administrator, can place orders.
The Trust engages in bitcoin transactions for converting cash into bitcoin (in association with purchase orders) and bitcoin into cash
(in association with redemption orders). The Trust conducts its bitcoin purchase and sale transactions by, in its sole discretion, choosing
to trade directly with third parties (each, a "bitcoin Trading Counterparty"), who are not registered broker-dealers pursuant
to written agreements between such bitcoin Trading Counterparties and the Trust, or choosing to trade through the Prime Broker acting
in an agency capacity with third parties through its Coinbase Prime service pursuant to the Prime Broker Agreement. A bitcoin Trading
Counterparty may be an affiliate of an Authorized Participant.

 The Authorized Participants
deliver only cash to create Shares and receive only cash when redeeming Shares. Further, Authorized Participants will not directly or
indirectly purchase, hold, deliver, or receive bitcoin as part of the creation or redemption process or otherwise direct the Trust or
a third-party with respect to purchasing, holding, delivering, or receiving bitcoin as part of the creation or redemption process.

 F- 8

 The Trust creates Shares by
receiving bitcoin from a third-party that is not the Authorized Participant and the Trust—not the Authorized Participant—is
responsible for selecting the third-party to deliver the bitcoin. Further, the third-party will not be acting as an agent of the Authorized
Participant with respect to the delivery of the bitcoin to the Trust or acting at the direction of the Authorized Participant with respect
to the delivery of the bitcoin to the Trust. The Trust redeems shares by delivering bitcoin to a third-party that is not the Authorized
Participant and the Trust—not the Authorized Participant—is responsible for selecting the third-party to receive the bitcoin.
Further, the third-party will not be acting as an agent of the Authorized Participant with respect to the receipt of the bitcoin from
the Trust or acting at the direction of the Authorized Participant with respect to the receipt of the bitcoin from the Trust. The third-party
is unaffiliated with the Trust and the Sponsor.

 5.
 Related Parties

 The Sponsor is a related party
to the Trust. The Trust's operations are supported by its Sponsor, who is in turn supported by its parent company and affiliated
companies and external service providers.

 As of December 31, 2023, the
Sponsor owned 2 Shares of the Trust.

 The Sponsor arranged for the
creation of the Trust and is responsible for the ongoing registration of the Shares for their public offering in the United States and
the listing of Shares on the Exchange.

 6.
 Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

 In the normal course of business,
the Trust may enter into contracts that contain a variety of general indemnification clauses. The Trust's maximum exposure under these
arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Trust which have not yet occurred and cannot
be predicted with any certainty. However, the Sponsor believes the risk of loss under these arrangements to be remote.

 7.
 Indemnification

 The Sponsor will not be liable
to the Trust, the Trustee or any Shareholder for any action taken or for refraining from taking any action in good faith, or for errors
in judgment or for depreciation or loss incurred by reason of the sale of any bitcoin or other assets of the Trust. However, the preceding
liability exclusion will not protect the Sponsor against any liability resulting from its own gross negligence, bad faith, or willful
misconduct.

 The Sponsor and each of its
shareholders, members, directors, officers, employees, affiliates, and subsidiaries will be indemnified by the Trust and held harmless
against any losses, liabilities or expenses incurred in the performance of its duties under the Declaration of Trust without gross negligence,
bad faith, or willful misconduct. The Sponsor may rely in good faith on any paper, order, notice, list, affidavit, receipt, evaluation,
opinion, endorsement, assignment, draft, or any other document of any kind prima facie properly executed and submitted to it by the Trustee,
the Trustee's counsel or by any other person for any matters arising under the Declaration of Trust. The Sponsor shall in no event
be deemed to have assumed or incurred any liability, duty, or obligation to any Shareholder or to the Trustee other than as expressly
provided for in the Declaration of Trust. Such indemnity includes payment from the Trust of the costs and expenses incurred in defending
against any indemnified claim or liability under the Declaration of Trust.

 The Trustee will not be liable
or accountable to the Trust or any other person or under any agreement to which the Trust or any series of the Trust is a party, except
for the Trustee's breach of its obligations pursuant to the Declaration of Trust or its own willful misconduct, bad faith or gross
negligence. The Trustee and each of the Trustee's officers, affiliates, directors, employees, and agents will be indemnified by
the Trust from and against any losses, claims, taxes, damages, reasonable expenses, and liabilities incurred with respect to the creation,
operation or termination of the Trust, the execution, delivery or performance of the Declaration of Trust or the transactions contemplated
thereby; provided that the indemnified party acted without willful misconduct, bad faith or gross negligence.

 8.
 Subsequent Events

 The Trust has evaluated subsequent
events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure through the date the financial statements were issued and has determined
that there are no material events that would require disclosure in the financial statements, other than noted below.

 The Trust began
operations and its shares started trading on the Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. on January 11, 2024. Refer to Note one for the transactions
that occured subsequent to the period December 12, 2023 (initial seed creation date)
through December 31, 2023.

 F- 9

 Unlimited

 false FY 0001869699 0

 2023-12-12
 2023-12-31

 2024-03-18

 2023-06-30

 2023-12-31

 2023-12-11

 2021-06-22
 2021-06-22

 2023-12-12

 2023-12-12
 2023-12-12

 2024-01-09

 2024-01-09
 2024-01-09